752:
criteria precisely to avoid all of that. The question is: "has this person been the subject of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources?" Someone can run for this or that, but if sources aren't there it doesn't matter. Likewise someone can fail at everything he/she does but if there are plenty of sources, it doesn't matter. --—
751:
or based on how many people know about something. Knowledge doesn't care about state politics or what someone means to people of a certain state. It doesn't care what state anybody is in, editor or subject. The question of whether something is notable is a technical term that provides quasi-objective
732:
Put it this way if Joseph
Avellone is not known to everyone in Massachusetts just some on Knowledge and when he ran for Governor probably. Now he's not noticeable unless he runs for something else later. Even if he might pass something here he still doesn't need an article now because what good will
558:
As a spokesman for various companies he was quoted numerous times. However, none of these passing mentions demonstrate previous notability. Also, although the subject need not be the main topic of the source material for it to be considered significant coverage, it is interesting to note that in the
427:
notable, but generally suggestive that significant sources exist (i.e. why high schools are typically kept -- not because they have special properties, but because we can assume sources will exist). I'd be a hypocrite if I stuck to that line of argument when called into question, though. So here are
364:
press from that one big event, it just requires some evidence that the person has received coverage for other stuff, too, even if not as substantial). Make all the arguments you want about individual items in the following list not making him notable, the fact of the matter is there appear to be one
636:
Hm. Well. A few of the above are minor mentions -- the ones I grabbed early in my search in response to your claim that the only articles that mention his various jobs are from election coverage. But anybody can click them or do their own research to see you're not fairly/accurately characterizing
621:
I'm not sure where you see "significant coverage about other things". The non-election sources do not provide any in-depth coverage. Most of them just give his name and his position with the company he worked for at the time, which is far from significant coverage. The only significant coverage he
582:
say that when a lot of someone's notoriety comes from one event, all of those sources about that event don't count and the person must start from scratch showing sources about other things. No, if it can be shown the person has also received significant coverage about other things, then ONEEVENT
682:
Face it? Ok, I've faced it. (I don't live in MA, btw). But
Knowledge doesn't actually care about job titles or elections or who runs for what. There are specific notability criteria that give us a shortcut to notability (e.g. win an Academy Award means lots of coverage, so you only need to know
577:
Let's break it down: There's no question he's notable for the recent election, right? And there have been many pieces written specifically about him for that, right? ONEEVENT, however, tells us that in such cases you have to consider if it's the event that should be covered instead (and, with
408:
gubernatorial candidate that mentions
Avellone only in passing. The source for his work at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts is an article about HMOs that only contains two small quotes from Avellone. There is no source in the article his work at Boston Heart Diagnostics nor is it even
403:
While
Avellone has done all of those things he has not received significant coverage for any of them. The only sources that mention his tenure as a Selectmen are articles about the gubernatorial election. The source for his time at PAREXEL and Veritas Medicine is the PAREXEL's website, a
667:
or Mark Fisher (who actually could make the ballot). I say delete the article and "IF" Joseph
Avellone runs in 2018, then maybe wikipedia can reconsider. Not all selectman in Massachusetts can have their own Knowledge article even if they helped a U.S. Senator run for President.
56:, but there is some merit to the claim that his business career has generated enough courage to make Mr Avellone notable otherwise. When both sides present reasonable arguments, and the community is divided as it is here, the result must be that no consensus can be declared.
606:
Rewording: The question is, looking at all of the coverage about this person for all purposes (but excluding brief mentions and primary sources), is the coverage significant? Span time? Independent? The answer is yes. Next question: is it all for one event? No. --—
717:
It occurs to me you basically just reiterated your delete vote rationale and I responded by reiterating a bunch of stuff I've already said, too. Here's hoping we get some new blood in the discussion as it's presently heading for no consensus. --—
892:. The sources provided above by Avellone show that the subject is not just known for the election. I am not convinced that that pre-campaign sources provide "significant coverage about other things," but combined with his candidacy, he passes
834:. The sources provided above show Avellone passes the general notability guideline. Sure, they probably need to be put in the article, but that is an editorial concern that doesn't affect whether or not he is notable.
187:
252:
who wins the democratic nomination in
September, they are well known. If Joseph Avellone made the ballot and was well known like Grossman and Coakley it would be more appropriate to keep but he was unable to.
365:
or more sources about him for each of these -- at least as far as I can tell. These, in combination with the recent election, makes him an easy keep: (1) Selectman (and
Chairman of the Board of Selectmen) in
355:
as far as I see. A lot of the coverage about him comes from the last 18 months while running for governor, sure, but he's got an impressive resume that removes ONEEVENT as a factor. Being notable for only
86:
800:
Indeed. Sort of what I had redacted from my own comments before (arguing in an opposite way at the mark fisher afd). But I think you mean
Plyjacks, not Ponyo (they are not the same afaik, anyway). --—
428:
the sources. PS: Not one of these is connected to the recent election (I only pulled articles pre-2013). All seem reliable (most from the Boston Globe). Many are negligible indeed. Many are not. --—
913:
Everything I can see is passing mention. Maybe he has a lot of passing mentions and minor accomplishments, but I really don't see that ONE magic thing that makes it obvious that he passes WP:GNG.
423:
As a general rule, I don't like citing common outcomes and other such shortcuts in deletion discussions, but that's admittedly what I was trying to do: point to a series of job titles as not
52:. The notability or lack thereof is not immediately clear but there are reasonable arguments on both sides. Certainly, being a losing candidate in a primary election is insufficient to pass
304:
226:, as he has not received significant coverage outside of this context (the only references in the article are a paragraph in Time Magazine and a quote in an article about HMOs).
284:
971:
and a bunch of passing mentions of the "Company spokesperson X said . . ." do not give him notability since the significant coverage is of the company, not the spokesperson.
1067:
324:
218:
The previous deletion discussion was closed an no consensus, in part because there was a desire not to rush to deletion as
Avellone was part of a breaking news event (the
181:
360:
isn't the same as receiving some coverage for a number of different things before getting a whole lot of coverage for one thing in particular (invoking ONEEVENT doesn't
222:). As Avellone failed to make the primary ballot, this is no longer an issue. The references provided do not show that the subject of the article is notable beyond this
140:
81:
683:
someone won an
Academy Award). He didn't win, so indeed he does not receive one of those shortcuts/free passes. No argument there, to be sure. So it falls back to
147:
703:. I find it hard to imagine an actor, musician, or baseball player with the same level of sourcing being deleted, so I fail to see why this person would be. --—
1038:
850:
This should have been delete the first time, and nothing has changed except he didn't make the primary. I'm still not seeing significant coverage in RS.
219:
382:
1097:
1029:
924:
597:"If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability."
474:
Boston Globe mentions his promotion in 1994, says he'll be the "company's number two executive with responsibility for the core business"
404:
non-independent source that does nothing to show notability. The source that covers his work for the Kerry campaign is an article about
113:
108:
1063:
554:
1992 Washington Post article talks about him in connection to Tsongas, says he "helped shape Tsongas's comprehensive health care plan"
117:
1085:
1121:
1020:
1003:
984:
955:
929:
905:
884:
859:
842:
822:
809:
795:
761:
742:
727:
712:
677:
646:
631:
616:
572:
437:
418:
394:
336:
316:
296:
273:
235:
65:
100:
17:
202:
269:
169:
1109:
1033:
691:
just like most other people's Knowledge pages. The question is whether there are sufficient sources talking about him in
1070:(titled "2 candidates, Juliette Kayyem and Joseph Avellone, miss cut for governor at Democratic convention") from the
381:
during 2004 Presidential run; (4) Profiled in Time Magazine in 1979 as one of "50 Faces for the Future"; (5) COO for
244:- If he actually made the ballot it would be appropriate to keep the article, but he didn't. It's either going to be
1105:
603:
subject) of many of the articles cited above. That he is not the sole subject of any of them isn't a deal-breaker.
1141:
1048:
1016:
627:
568:
414:
231:
163:
40:
366:
159:
920:
531:
negligible indeed, but at least secondary source verified in this financial report via US Fed News Service
896:. (i.e. neither his candidacy or his earlier work would make him notable alone, but together they do). --
1137:
1036:(titled "Democrat Joe Avellone's campaign for governor endorsed by five Norfolk County officials") from
36:
1058:
209:
655:
Face it: He didn't make the ballot for 2014 and the Governor's race will mostly be focusing on either
1101:
1012:
968:
953:
855:
623:
564:
410:
257:
227:
104:
53:
977:
802:
784:
Plyjacks voted to deleted at the previous AFD purely because a pet article of his was also deleted
754:
720:
705:
639:
609:
430:
387:
195:
60:
550:
1991 Globe article spends several paragraphs talking about him, also mentioning him as a selectman
1113:
999:
738:
673:
357:
265:
223:
1043:
914:
901:
880:
352:
332:
312:
292:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1136:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
695:
capacity (combined; having established it's for multiple reasons already) sufficient to pass
175:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1117:
1090:
1075:
1071:
1056:(titled "Joseph Avellone, a Democratic candidate for governor, has Central Mass. tie") from
1053:
939:
871:
even without losing the nomination, but much of what's available online, as noted above, is
748:
1080:
950:
851:
535:
also this 2010 Health and Beauty Close-Up magazine article that quotes him for the company
96:
71:
972:
868:
660:
656:
385:; (6) CEO of Veritas Medicine; (7) Board of Directors at Boston Heart Diagnostics. --—
249:
245:
57:
462:
talking to the Boston Globe in 1992 about how much they pay for smoking-related claims
995:
893:
872:
734:
700:
696:
688:
684:
669:
664:
348:
261:
452:
speaking at somewhat more length to the Globe as selectman about David Locke in 1992
897:
876:
836:
816:
789:
374:
328:
308:
288:
530:
134:
622:
ever received comes from the 2014 election and therefore ONEEVENT does apply. --
542:
538:
534:
519:
523:
505:
469:
549:
515:
509:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
465:
461:
457:
451:
447:
443:
1066:(titled "Mass. Governor Hopeful Avellone Banking On Business Experience") and
553:
378:
942:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
466:
commenting about Boston City Hospital for Blue Cross in the Boston Globe 1992
1078:(titled "Gov. candidate Joseph Avellone lays out 3-point jobs plan") from
559:
two decades worth of articles provided, Avellone is not the main topic of
637:
them (i.e. that "most of them just give his name and his position"). --—
458:
speaking for the company in 1996 about drug benefits in the Boston Globe
470:
1996 Knight Ridden Tribute article about seniors protesting a rate hike
370:
599:
He is the primary source for or a prominent subject (even if not the
1088:(titled "Avellone: Lowell a model for helping at-risk youths") from
482:
1994 Boston Globe article about Blue Cross buying doctors' practices
1130:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1046:(titled "Democrat Joseph Avellone 'not your average Joe'") from
539:
Wireless News article from 2010 quotes him speaking for Parexel
1011:
He does not pass notability. Low level doctor and politician.
583:
simply doesn't apply and we're back to the GNG or BASIC.
377:
during 1992 Presidential run; (3) health care advisor to
785:
478:
another from the Boston Globe in 1996 about Medex hikes
130:
126:
122:
498:
primary source in 1994 Globe article about some report
194:
87:
Articles for deletion/Joseph Avellone (2nd nomination)
949:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
747:Knowledge doesn't keep or delete articles based on
490:
Bay State Banner article mentions him as VP in 1994
305:
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions
285:list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions
1102:Knowledge:Notability#General notability guideline
524:2002 Drug Week article quotes him speaking as CEO
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1144:). No further edits should be made to this page.
325:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
578:elections, that's usually the case). It does
347:- Surprised by the nomination. Easy pass for
208:
8:
1100:to allow Port Place Shopping Centre to pass
323:Note: This debate has been included in the
303:Note: This debate has been included in the
283:Note: This debate has been included in the
1104:, which requires "significant coverage in
444:Globe reports he's chosen as vice chairman
322:
302:
282:
1028:per the significant coverage in multiple
220:2014 Massachusetts gubernatorial election
383:Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts
79:
780:This is a good time to point out that
486:another Globe story on medex from 1996
82:Articles for deletion/Joseph Avellone
7:
448:1991 Globe article on Selectman win
78:
24:
1096:There is sufficient coverage in
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
510:and again in 1996, but longer
494:1991 Globe article quotes him
373:; (3) health care advisor to
409:mentioned in the article. --
1161:
1021:21:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
1004:22:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
985:04:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
956:01:29, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
930:00:40, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
906:16:52, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
885:16:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
860:04:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
843:07:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
823:13:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
810:07:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
796:22:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
762:00:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
743:23:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
728:18:59, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
713:18:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
678:18:19, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
647:22:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
632:16:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
617:15:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
573:15:04, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
543:China Weekly News in 2012
438:05:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
419:03:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
395:03:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
337:02:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
317:02:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
297:02:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
274:01:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
236:22:35, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
1133:Please do not modify it.
1122:06:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
735:Kegejoeco (aka Plyjacks)
670:Kegejoeco (aka Plyjacks)
367:Wellesley, Massachusetts
66:14:02, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
1059:Telegram & Gazette
873:not exactly flattering
446:(negligible mention),
369:; (2) Executive VP at
77:AfDs for this article:
994:as Rhododendrites.
548:Advisor to Tsongas:
502:and again in 1996...
48:The result was
1112:of the subject".
1013:John Pack Lambert
958:
927:
749:what good it does
587:sources that are
520:2006 Boston Globe
516:2000 Boston Globe
506:and again in 1996
339:
319:
299:
277:
260:comment added by
63:
1152:
1135:
1106:reliable sources
1098:reliable sources
1072:Associated Press
1030:reliable sources
982:
980:Let's discuss it
948:
944:
925:
839:
819:
807:
805:
792:
759:
757:
725:
723:
710:
708:
644:
642:
614:
612:
595:necessary. See:
435:
433:
392:
390:
276:
254:
213:
212:
198:
150:
138:
120:
61:
34:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1142:deletion review
1131:
1081:The Herald News
978:
937:
837:
817:
814:Fixed. Thanks.
803:
801:
790:
755:
753:
721:
719:
706:
704:
640:
638:
624:Hirolovesswords
610:
608:
565:Hirolovesswords
431:
429:
411:Hirolovesswords
388:
386:
255:
228:Hirolovesswords
155:
146:
111:
97:Joseph Avellone
95:
92:
75:
72:Joseph Avellone
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1158:
1156:
1147:
1146:
1126:
1125:
1049:The Enterprise
1039:The Republican
1023:
1006:
988:
987:
961:
960:
959:
946:
945:
934:
933:
932:
908:
887:
869:barely notable
867:- he would be
862:
845:
828:
827:
826:
825:
804:Rhododendrites
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
756:Rhododendrites
730:
722:Rhododendrites
707:Rhododendrites
661:Martha Coakley
657:Steve Grossman
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
641:Rhododendrites
611:Rhododendrites
604:
591:about him are
546:
527:
512:
454:
440:
432:Rhododendrites
398:
397:
389:Rhododendrites
341:
340:
320:
300:
279:
278:
250:Martha Coakley
246:Steve Grossman
216:
215:
152:
91:
90:
89:
84:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1157:
1145:
1143:
1139:
1134:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1093:
1092:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1045:
1041:
1040:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
990:
989:
986:
983:
981:
976:
975:
970:
969:WP:POLITICIAN
966:
963:
962:
957:
954:
952:
947:
943:
941:
936:
935:
931:
928:
922:
918:
917:
912:
909:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
888:
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
863:
861:
857:
853:
849:
846:
844:
841:
840:
833:
830:
829:
824:
821:
820:
813:
812:
811:
806:
799:
798:
797:
794:
793:
786:
783:
763:
758:
750:
746:
745:
744:
740:
736:
731:
729:
724:
716:
715:
714:
709:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
681:
680:
679:
675:
671:
666:
665:Charlie Baker
662:
658:
654:
648:
643:
635:
634:
633:
629:
625:
620:
619:
618:
613:
605:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
581:
576:
575:
574:
570:
566:
562:
557:
556:
555:
551:
547:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
525:
521:
517:
513:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:Blue Cross -
455:
453:
449:
445:
441:
439:
434:
426:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
407:
402:
401:
400:
399:
396:
391:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
359:
354:
350:
346:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
280:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
251:
247:
243:
240:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
211:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:Find sources:
153:
149:
145:
142:
136:
132:
128:
124:
119:
115:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
88:
85:
83:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
59:
55:
54:WP:POLITICIAN
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1132:
1129:
1095:
1089:
1086:this article
1079:
1076:this article
1068:this article
1064:this article
1057:
1054:this article
1047:
1044:this article
1037:
1034:this article
1025:
1008:
991:
979:
973:
964:
938:
916:Dennis Brown
915:
910:
889:
864:
847:
835:
831:
815:
788:
781:
692:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
579:
560:
424:
405:
375:Paul Tsongas
361:
344:
256:— Preceding
241:
217:
205:
199:
191:
184:
178:
172:
166:
156:
143:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
1110:independent
911:Weak delete
563:of them. --
442:Selectman:
358:WP:ONEEVENT
182:free images
951:j⚛e decker
852:GoldenRing
585:Additional
425:inherently
379:John Kerry
353:WP:NPEOPLE
1138:talk page
1108:that are
967:He fails
890:Weak Keep
865:Weak keep
529:Parexel:
514:Veritas:
329:• Gene93k
309:• Gene93k
289:• Gene93k
224:one event
58:Sjakkalle
37:talk page
1140:or in a
996:Gregkaye
940:Relisted
270:contribs
262:Plyjacks
258:unsigned
141:View log
62:(Check!)
39:or in a
1091:The Sun
898:Enos733
877:Bearian
838:Calidum
818:Calidum
791:Calidum
733:it do.
406:another
371:PAREXEL
188:WP refs
176:scholar
114:protect
109:history
1114:Cunard
1084:, and
1052:, and
1032:. See
1009:Delete
974:Cullen
965:Delete
894:WP:GNG
848:Delete
701:WP:BIO
697:WP:GNG
689:WP:BIO
685:WP:GNG
362:negate
349:WP:GNG
242:Delete
160:Google
118:delete
782:Ponyo
203:JSTOR
164:books
148:Stats
135:views
127:watch
123:links
16:<
1118:talk
1026:Keep
1017:talk
1000:talk
992:Keep
902:talk
881:talk
856:talk
832:Keep
739:talk
674:talk
628:talk
601:main
589:only
569:talk
415:talk
345:Keep
333:talk
313:talk
293:talk
266:talk
232:talk
196:FENS
170:news
131:logs
105:talk
101:edit
926:WER
808:|
760:|
726:|
711:|
693:any
645:|
615:|
593:not
580:not
561:any
436:|
393:|
351:or
248:or
210:TWL
139:– (
1120:)
1074:,
1062:,
1042:,
1019:)
1002:)
923:|
921:2¢
919:|
904:)
883:)
875:.
858:)
787:.
741:)
676:)
663:,
659:,
630:)
571:)
552:,
541:,
537:,
533:,
522:,
518:,
508:,
504:,
500:,
496:,
492:,
488:,
484:,
480:,
476:,
472:,
468:,
464:,
460:,
450:,
417:)
335:)
327:.
315:)
307:.
295:)
287:.
272:)
268:•
234:)
190:)
133:|
129:|
125:|
121:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
1116:(
1094:.
1015:(
998:(
900:(
879:(
854:(
737:(
699:/
687:/
672:(
626:(
567:(
545:,
526:,
413:(
331:(
311:(
291:(
264:(
230:(
214:)
206:·
200:·
192:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
162:(
154:(
151:)
144:·
137:)
99:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.