Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Jagannath Dixit - Knowledge

Source 📝

629:, ohhh I was just waiting for you, as you have been stalking my contributions, you would come and comment here too. I want to remind you that, you have been suggested to not stalk and follow my contributions, please stop making false alligations and personal attacks on me. here talk about content, provide refs and be civil if you could. 607:
not new, the Whole Marathi Knowledge is full by similar Vandalism and the user has been even blocked in the past for similar vandalism there. I advise the current stub article to be kept as per comments of User:Oakshade and must be properly improved in a neutral way and we hope to find new sources in near future. Thanking you. --
606:
I don't find this Deletion request valid. The person is notable and I don't see any self-advertisment as commented by DGG as Jagannath and the article creator/editor Abhijeet Safai are two different one. Secondly this request looks as a rivalry request by the Nominator as this is something which is
242:
Though there are mentions of the subject in several news articles. All the sources mentioned are about lectures/workshops delivered by the subject. Nothing about why the subject is notable? No secondary reference is given. I fear such third party source exists on the subject. So it does not pass
415:
Interesting. Lets consider each point which WBG has mentioned. Lets leave the word lunatic because we cannot expect better language from him, but I am curious to know how he terms Dr. Dixit as right wing. Also was the charlatan word was for WBG himself? I agree with that then. Thank you. Happy
461:
The claims of Dr. Dixit that amount of insulin released in response to meals has no relation with the quality and quantity of meals is factually incorrect, and is in stark contrast to the physiological facts established via numerous published studies.....Dr. Dixit’s viral claim is not only
452:
Experts from Indian Medical Association (IMA) pointed out that Dr Dixit is neither a dietician nor a diabetologist and hence his claims need to be put to scientific test before they can be accepted......Dr Dixit is not a diabetologist neither he is a dietician. Hence he cannot promote this
393:
Seems to be another right wing lunatic charlatan who chooses to undertake scientific research by the means of media-coverage rather than by publications in credible scientific journals. NOTNEWS and all that; there is hardly any in-depth coverage.
566::-) I still believe that it's in NOTNEWS territory, every-time somebody claims such bunkum stuff, the media flocks but on retrospection, the benefit of having the article to aware readers of the dubiousness exceeds the downsides. 303:
I cannot stop laughing when I read something like no secondary references are given! Surely the person making such claims should understand what WP means by secondary sources. I wish them good luck for study! -- Dr.
211: 511:
just by going from the English language sources in the article. Probably a lot more in the Indian languages sources. Even if a person is a quack/charlatan/fraud, that doesn't mean they can't be notable.
439:
Dr Dixit has also been appointed as BJP’s brand ambassador for anti-obesity and diabetes reversal....the Dixit diet plan was originally conceived by the late Dr Shrikant Jichkar, who was also a politician.
281: 345: 205: 164: 434: 262: 111: 96: 171: 321:- The discussion regarding possibility of conflict of interest / paid editing of the account which has proposed this deletion is going on 137: 132: 141: 577: 485: 405: 124: 91: 84: 17: 226: 456: 383: 193: 567: 475: 447: 395: 105: 101: 656: 187: 40: 421: 330: 309: 637: 621: 598: 579: 554: 529: 487: 425: 407: 357: 353: 334: 313: 292: 273: 254: 183: 66: 652: 630: 550: 542: 500: 247: 36: 233: 371: 128: 504: 471: 417: 375: 326: 305: 244: 219: 62: 525: 379: 349: 285: 266: 80: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
651:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
199: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
546: 517: 513: 462:
misinformed but is potentially harmful for the pre-diabetic and type-2 diabetes patients....
120: 72: 587:
as self-advertisement. That's a sufficient reason for deletion regardless of notability.
626: 608: 58: 54: 594: 538: 521: 508: 467: 158: 322: 589: 563: 453:
diet.....There has to be a proper study that backs his claim.....
446:
from Jimbo's famous reply, the context of which may be read over
647:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
282:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
466:
Describing me to be a charlatan is very close to violating
562:-- On re-thoughts, this will be a nice re-rendition of 346:
list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions
154: 150: 146: 218: 368:
Notable, however the article needs to be developed.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 659:). No further edits should be made to this page. 344:Note: This discussion has been included in the 280:Note: This discussion has been included in the 261:Note: This discussion has been included in the 232: 8: 112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 369: 343: 279: 263:list of India-related deletion discussions 260: 470:and I advice you to be cautious enough. 450:. Also, the above-linked source states 507:aside, this topic does appear to pass 460: 451: 438: 7: 545:isn't a reason to delete a page. -- 24: 97:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 87:(AfD)? Read these primers! 676: 638:07:44, 30 March 2019 (UTC) 622:07:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC) 599:18:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC) 580:14:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC) 555:09:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC) 530:01:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC) 488:07:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC) 426:06:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC) 408:06:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC) 358:07:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC) 335:07:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC) 314:18:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC) 293:20:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC) 274:20:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC) 255:18:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC) 67:01:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC) 649:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 541:and as Oakshade said, 85:Articles for deletion 55:(non-admin closure) 468:one of our pillars 444:Lunatic charlatan 387: 374:comment added by 360: 295: 276: 102:Guide to deletion 92:How to contribute 57: 667: 634: 633:QueerEcofeminist 619: 615: 612: 575: 570: 483: 478: 403: 398: 290: 271: 251: 250:QueerEcofeminist 237: 236: 222: 174: 162: 144: 82: 53: 34: 675: 674: 670: 669: 668: 666: 665: 664: 663: 657:deletion review 632: 617: 613: 610: 571: 568: 537:Article passes 479: 476: 437:which mentions 399: 396: 286: 267: 249: 179: 170: 135: 121:Jagannath Dixit 119: 116: 79: 76: 73:Jagannath Dixit 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 673: 671: 662: 661: 643: 642: 641: 640: 601: 582: 557: 543:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 532: 501:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 464: 457:Another source 441: 418:Abhijeet Safai 388: 362: 361: 340: 339: 338: 337: 327:Abhijeet Safai 306:Abhijeet Safai 297: 296: 277: 240: 239: 176: 115: 114: 109: 99: 94: 77: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 672: 660: 658: 654: 650: 645: 644: 639: 636: 635: 628: 625: 624: 623: 620: 616: 605: 602: 600: 596: 592: 591: 586: 583: 581: 578: 576: 574: 565: 561: 558: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 533: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 510: 506: 502: 498: 495: 489: 486: 484: 482: 473: 469: 465: 463: 458: 454: 449: 445: 442: 440: 436: 432: 429: 428: 427: 423: 419: 414: 411: 410: 409: 406: 404: 402: 392: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 367: 364: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350:Coolabahapple 347: 342: 341: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 317: 316: 315: 311: 307: 302: 299: 298: 294: 291: 289: 283: 278: 275: 272: 270: 264: 259: 258: 257: 256: 253: 252: 246: 235: 231: 228: 225: 221: 217: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 185: 182: 181:Find sources: 177: 173: 169: 166: 160: 156: 152: 148: 143: 139: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 117: 113: 110: 107: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 89: 88: 86: 81: 74: 71: 69: 68: 64: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 648: 646: 631: 609: 603: 588: 584: 572: 559: 534: 505:WP:JIMBOSAID 496: 480: 443: 430: 416:editing. -- 412: 400: 390: 370:— Preceding 365: 318: 300: 288:CAPTAIN RAJU 287: 269:CAPTAIN RAJU 268: 248: 245:WP:NACADEMIC 241: 229: 223: 215: 208: 202: 196: 190: 180: 167: 78: 49: 47: 31: 28: 547:Rsrikanth05 435:this source 301:Strong Keep 206:free images 431:Right wing 653:talk page 627:Tiven2240 59:DannyS712 37:talk page 655:or in a 522:Oakshade 384:contribs 376:Lubbad85 372:unsigned 165:View log 106:glossary 39:or in a 459:states 413:Comment 319:Comment 212:WP refs 200:scholar 138:protect 133:history 83:New to 585:Delete 564:BGR-34 539:WP:GNG 509:WP:GNG 391:Delete 184:Google 142:delete 595:talk 518:Cough 514:Cough 433:from 325:. -- 227:JSTOR 188:books 172:Stats 159:views 151:watch 147:links 16:< 618:२२४० 604:Keep 560:Keep 551:talk 535:Keep 526:talk 520:.) 503:and 497:Keep 472:Best 448:here 422:talk 380:talk 366:Keep 354:talk 331:talk 323:here 310:talk 220:FENS 194:news 155:logs 129:talk 125:edit 63:talk 50:keep 611:✝iѵ 590:DGG 573:WBG 481:WBG 401:WBG 234:TWL 163:– ( 614:ɛɳ 597:) 553:) 528:) 516:. 499:- 474:, 455:. 424:) 386:) 382:• 356:) 348:. 333:) 312:) 284:. 265:. 214:) 157:| 153:| 149:| 145:| 140:| 136:| 131:| 127:| 65:) 52:. 593:( 569:∯ 549:( 524:( 512:( 477:∯ 420:( 397:∯ 378:( 352:( 329:( 308:( 238:) 230:· 224:· 216:· 209:· 203:· 197:· 191:· 186:( 178:( 175:) 168:· 161:) 123:( 108:) 104:( 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
DannyS712
talk
01:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Jagannath Dixit

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Jagannath Dixit
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.