430:
in the non-technical sense, and makes no claim to technical or historical importance, or any other credible claim to public note. We either need stricter standards of a sort that would exclude behind the scenes businesses like this, or else abandon any pretense to excluding spam and throw open the
431:
gates to articles written by marketing consultants. This sort of thing just does not belong. But if PC World and the New York Times have published stories about it, it probably meets the consensus for current standards. -
160:
290:
235:
115:
154:
398:
386:
464:
business startups in software space, coverage in adequate sources may be a bit of a crap-shoot, or at least a function of your marketing people's connections. -
261:
456:-y either. It is, instead, a symptom of the sort of thing we're always going to face by allowing articles about businesses that are "notable" under
120:
223:
88:
83:
92:
17:
75:
175:
426:. It does not appear to produce well known products under its own brand, or market them to the general public. It isn't
142:
460:
but not really. "My competitor has an article; why shouldn't the business that interests me?" When you're dealing with
342:
517:
191:
this article is terrible, has practically no references, and has been tagged for months without being cleaned up
36:
516:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
136:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
312:- plenty of sources out there, gets covered in the regional paper The Oregonian all the time, ditto with the
360:
502:
473:
440:
413:
372:
350:
325:
304:
276:
251:
215:
200:
132:
57:
340:
321:
196:
227:
182:
345:
338:
168:
486:
302:
79:
313:
368:
210:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
498:
469:
436:
409:
317:
272:
247:
192:
53:
148:
453:
286:
231:
457:
294:
71:
63:
364:
109:
494:
465:
432:
405:
268:
243:
49:
209:- nomination itemises reasons for improving the article, not deleting it. --
427:
461:
510:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
228:
deletion should not be used for articles simply needing cleanup
424:
software company in the enterprise social-networking business
240:
gave the nominator some advice about deletion of this article
291:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Blogtronix (2nd nomination)
239:
105:
101:
97:
489:, as pointed out above. The. New. York. Times. Yes,
167:
452:. I don't think the current nomination is really
344:), among other sources, and is obviously notable.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
520:). No further edits should be made to this page.
422:, but very, very weakly. This calls itself a
399:list of Business-related deletion discussions
387:list of Software-related deletion discussions
181:
8:
359:This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing
262:list of Oregon-related deletion discussions
393:
381:
256:
397:: This debate has been included in the
385:: This debate has been included in the
260:: This debate has been included in the
7:
333:Has received extensive coverage in
316:. Needs clean-up, not a deletion.
24:
224:reliable sources are easily found
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
503:16:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
474:15:26, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
441:15:13, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
414:15:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
373:14:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
351:08:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
326:04:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
305:00:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
277:23:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
252:23:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
230:. Further, this is likely a
216:23:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
201:23:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
58:17:36, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
537:
314:Portland Business Journal
513:Please do not modify it.
234:deletion in response to
32:Please do not modify it.
363:). It is listed now.
487:The New York Times
335:The New York Times
44:The result was
493:New York Times.
416:
402:
390:
285:Nomination seems
279:
265:
528:
515:
403:
348:
300:
297:
266:
213:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
50:Kevin Rutherford
34:
536:
535:
531:
530:
529:
527:
526:
525:
524:
518:deletion review
511:
466:Smerdis of Tlön
433:Smerdis of Tlön
406:Smerdis of Tlön
346:
298:
295:
211:
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
534:
532:
523:
522:
506:
505:
479:
478:
477:
476:
444:
443:
417:
391:
378:
377:
376:
375:
354:
353:
347:Steven Walling
328:
307:
280:
254:
218:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
533:
521:
519:
514:
508:
507:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
481:
480:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
448:
447:
446:
445:
442:
438:
434:
429:
425:
421:
418:
415:
411:
407:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:
356:
355:
352:
349:
343:
341:
339:
336:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
292:
288:
284:
281:
278:
274:
270:
263:
259:
255:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
219:
217:
214:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:Jive Software
69:
68:
65:
64:Jive Software
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
512:
509:
490:
482:
449:
423:
419:
394:
382:
334:
330:
309:
282:
257:
220:
212:Escape Orbit
206:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
318:Aboutmovies
193:Elimccargar
155:free images
485:- It made
242:recently.
289:based on
454:WP:POINT
116:View log
462:May-fly
450:Comment
428:notable
365:DumbBOT
283:Comment
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
495:Samboy
458:WP:GNG
361:step 3
337:(see:
287:pointy
269:tedder
244:tedder
232:pointy
226:, and
133:Google
93:delete
299:16888
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
499:talk
491:that
483:Keep
470:talk
437:talk
420:Keep
410:talk
395:Note
383:Note
369:talk
331:Keep
322:talk
310:Keep
273:talk
258:Note
248:talk
238:. I
236:this
221:Keep
207:Keep
197:talk
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:keep
296:Jac
267:--
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
501:)
472:)
439:)
412:)
404:-
401:.
389:.
371:)
324:)
293:--
275:)
264:.
250:)
199:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
497:(
468:(
435:(
408:(
367:(
320:(
271:(
246:(
195:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.