203:
seems to claim that there is no difference between modern, fairly rationally-grounded legal processes and shamans’ contacting various spirits in drug-altered mental states. Perhaps my personal opinion on a theory matters little to what treatment it gets on
Knowledge, but IMHO, the quality of Tomas’s
255:
claims is that the judicial processes of shamans and of modern court judges are not appreciably different. The rôle of impartial arbiter is ancient, but that does not mean that it has not changed radically in its form in all that time.
133:
52:, no merger. Side note: I'm a jurist and frankly, the whole idea sounds like drug-induced nonsense to me – perhaps unsurprisingly so, given this theory's origins in
100:
95:
104:
270:
Actually, you're right: despite the supposed references (which I can't be bothered to verify) there is no evidence this concept is notable.
87:
152:. I conclude that this topic is not notable as it is the pet theory of Stanislovas Tomas. Therefore, this article ought to be deleted.
234:
article that one of a shaman's roles was, er, judge. So modern judicial processes are based on ancient shamanic processes anyway.
199:
is about judges’ “usurping” extrajudicial power by ignoring precedent, ruling against laws as unconstitutional, and such; whereas
17:
145:
327:
184:
36:
283:
265:
246:
225:
188:
161:
69:
326:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
91:
261:
221:
157:
208:; this would probably explain why he is the only one using the term. I still believe the article should be
279:
242:
83:
75:
308:
257:
217:
180:
153:
65:
300:
275:
238:
195:
172:
141:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
149:
304:
204:
argumentation is spurious at best, seeming to rely entirely on an extremely simplistic
140:
The only uses of this term that I can find in academic works are by
Stanislovas Tomas (
61:
205:
175:
as a special case. "Judicial shamanism" seems to be an almost vacuous term which is
53:
121:
212:, but maybe it can fit in as a suggestion in some related article (though
231:
320:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
57:
148:). Note that searching for “judicial shamanism” yields
128:
117:
113:
109:
236:
I'm against deletion, but in favour of a severe trim.
167:After reading the article, it seems like it should
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
330:). No further edits should be made to this page.
179:widely used and doesn't need its own article.
8:
251:I don’t think that is contested. What
7:
24:
230:As an aside, I found through the
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
284:18:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
266:13:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
247:17:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
226:13:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
189:07:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
162:11:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
146:in this Google Scholar search
70:22:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
193:Hmm… I’m not sure I agree.
347:
150:no Google Book Search hits
323:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
216:seems inappropriate).
258:Raifʻhār Doremítzwr
218:Raifʻhār Doremítzwr
154:Raifʻhār Doremítzwr
253:judicial shamanism
201:judicial shamanism
84:Judicial shamanism
76:Judicial shamanism
301:judicial activism
214:judicial activism
196:Judicial activism
173:Judicial activism
50:Judicial activism
338:
325:
299:and redirect to
131:
125:
107:
34:
346:
345:
341:
340:
339:
337:
336:
335:
334:
328:deletion review
321:
181:The Bearded One
127:
98:
82:
79:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
344:
342:
333:
332:
315:
313:
312:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
138:
137:
78:
73:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
343:
331:
329:
324:
318:
317:
316:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
268:
267:
263:
259:
254:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
237:
233:
229:
228:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
206:false analogy
202:
198:
197:
192:
191:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
164:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
135:
130:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
54:postmodernism
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
322:
319:
314:
305:Qit el-Remel
296:
276:JustIgnoreMe
271:
252:
239:JustIgnoreMe
235:
213:
209:
200:
194:
176:
168:
139:
45:
43:
31:
28:
62:Sandstein
169:Redirect
134:View log
46:redirect
303:page. —
210:deleted
101:protect
96:history
56:and in
272:Delete
232:Shaman
129:delete
105:delete
297:Merge
132:) – (
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
309:talk
280:talk
262:talk
243:talk
222:talk
185:talk
158:talk
144:and
142:here
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
66:talk
58:1968
177:not
171:to
48:to
282:)
274:.
264:)
245:)
224:)
187:)
160:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
68:)
60:.
311:)
307:(
278:(
260:(
241:(
220:(
183:(
156:(
136:)
126:(
124:)
86:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.