Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/OneTick - Knowledge

Source 📝

563:
As I read the papers, they make use of this along with other products, but they are not about this product. The market research paper is limited circulation and very difficult for anyone not in the industry to access. I cannot tell from the Oxford press release whether this is principal software or
462:
as both non-notable and entirely promotional; this is exactly the sort of writing we need to discourage; The sources added in the rewriting are not acceptable: the Belianina paper is by the firms sales engineer, thus not independent evidence for anything; HFTR is not a true product review, but a
519:) Keep. Refined the description of product, company and key features removing any promotional aspect. Notability references are from university researchers (Dr. Creamer at Stevens Institute) his (downloadable) paper references the use of OneTick product in independently conducted analysis, 523:
conference paper (Maria Belianina) has strict guidelines on content for participation - not promotional, OxFord University's use of OneTick in their DataLab is independent and mentioned reference and independent analyst reports (Aite Group) are (pay-for) downloadable reports.
266:
Recent revisions were to provide updated information regarding company (last update was from 2009). No more spammy than similar companies in same category/business (also with Wiki pages) Sybase, KX Systems, Streambase, Vhayu.
166: 587:
Reading that this software has been launched by somebody that has worked for the most evil bank of the world makes me have some mixed feelings... but the software is indeed "notable." --
564:
just one of the many products in their laboratory. If the article should be kept, I will at least remove the promotionalist style and clarify what the references actually show.
219: 121: 160: 57: 303:
The spaminess of the article can be fixed and isn't necessarily grounds for deletion. However, my concern is that the product in question isn't
53: 126: 608: 463:
straight press release; the other sources do not mention the product, but just the general approach. And the awards are minor.
548: 390: 350: 291: 326:
I understand better what is being sought. Yes, I can provide sources that cover the product. I will include in the page itself.
427: 17: 181: 94: 89: 148: 98: 636: 40: 81: 311:
that cover this product significantly (not trivially or in passing), thereby demonstrating its notability?
612: 244:- It certainly is a bit spammy. That aside, I can't find significant sources that suggest this product is 142: 632: 36: 525: 367: 327: 268: 604: 544: 540: 536: 386: 382: 378: 346: 342: 338: 287: 283: 279: 588: 138: 592: 422: 174: 616: 596: 575: 530: 506: 474: 454: 433: 372: 332: 317: 273: 258: 233: 210: 85: 63: 206: 188: 229: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
631:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
359: 77: 69: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
484: 450: 405: 497: 417: 571: 470: 304: 245: 202: 154: 308: 225: 115: 446: 366:
definition. I have also revised content pertaining to spaminess. Please advise.
312: 253: 363: 487:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
408:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
566: 465: 362:
page to include referenced sources that cover the product per Wiki's
201:
Company spam. Non notable company/product using WP for promotion.
625:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
520: 111: 107: 103: 173: 415:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →
494:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 639:). No further edits should be made to this page. 601:Delete. Non-notable, reads like advertisement. 445:. New sources clearly demonstrate notability. 248:. Whereas the company that makes the product 220:list of Software-related deletion discussions 187: 8: 218:Note: This debate has been included in the 252:be notable, this product by itself is not. 217: 7: 322:Having now read the definition of 24: 54:The Blade of the Northern Lights 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 656: 617:23:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 597:10:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 576:03:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 64:02:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 628:Please do not modify it. 531:11:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 507:06:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC) 475:04:52, 3 June 2012 (UTC) 455:18:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC) 434:03:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC) 373:22:10, 24 May 2012 (UTC) 333:13:25, 23 May 2012 (UTC) 318:15:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC) 274:10:45, 23 May 2012 (UTC) 259:18:25, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 234:03:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 211:21:24, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 517:duplicate keep opinion 358:I have revised the 528: 370: 330: 315: 307:. Can you provide 271: 256: 48:The result was 607:comment added by 553: 539:comment added by 526: 509: 505: 436: 395: 381:comment added by 368: 355: 341:comment added by 328: 313: 296: 282:comment added by 269: 254: 236: 223: 647: 630: 619: 552: 533: 504: 502: 495: 493: 489: 432: 430: 425: 420: 414: 410: 394: 375: 354: 335: 309:reliable sources 295: 276: 224: 192: 191: 177: 129: 119: 101: 60: 34: 655: 654: 650: 649: 648: 646: 645: 644: 643: 637:deletion review 626: 602: 534: 498: 496: 482: 428: 423: 418: 416: 403: 376: 336: 277: 134: 125: 92: 76: 73: 58: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 653: 651: 642: 641: 621: 620: 599: 581: 580: 579: 578: 555: 554: 512: 511: 510: 491: 490: 479: 478: 477: 457: 439: 438: 437: 412: 411: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 356: 320: 298: 297: 261: 238: 237: 214: 213: 195: 194: 131: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 652: 640: 638: 634: 629: 623: 622: 618: 614: 610: 606: 600: 598: 594: 590: 586: 583: 582: 577: 573: 569: 568: 562: 559: 558: 557: 556: 550: 546: 542: 538: 532: 529: 522: 518: 514: 513: 508: 503: 501: 492: 488: 486: 481: 480: 476: 472: 468: 467: 461: 458: 456: 452: 448: 444: 441: 440: 435: 431: 426: 421: 413: 409: 407: 402: 401: 392: 388: 384: 380: 374: 371: 365: 361: 357: 352: 348: 344: 340: 334: 331: 325: 321: 319: 316: 310: 306: 302: 301: 300: 299: 293: 289: 285: 281: 275: 272: 265: 262: 260: 257: 251: 247: 243: 240: 239: 235: 231: 227: 221: 216: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 196: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 123: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 627: 624: 609:38.99.14.218 603:— Preceding 584: 565: 560: 535:— Preceding 516: 499: 483: 464: 459: 442: 404: 377:— Preceding 337:— Preceding 323: 278:— Preceding 263: 249: 241: 198: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 49: 47: 31: 28: 161:free images 541:LouisLovas 527:LouisLovas 500:Sandstein 383:LouisLovas 369:LouisLovas 364:Notability 343:LouisLovas 329:LouisLovas 314:P. D. Cook 284:LouisLovas 270:LouisLovas 255:P. D. Cook 633:talk page 589:Hiddenray 521:R/Finance 226:• Gene93k 37:talk page 635:or in a 605:unsigned 549:contribs 537:unsigned 485:Relisted 406:Relisted 391:contribs 379:unsigned 351:contribs 339:unsigned 292:contribs 280:unsigned 203:HighKing 122:View log 39:or in a 561:comment 360:OneTick 324:Notable 305:notable 246:notable 167:WP refs 155:scholar 95:protect 90:history 78:OneTick 70:OneTick 460:Delete 447:JulesH 242:Delete 199:Delete 139:Google 99:delete 59:話して下さい 50:delete 572:talk 471:talk 424:music 250:might 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 116:views 108:watch 104:links 16:< 613:talk 593:talk 585:keep 545:talk 451:talk 443:Keep 387:talk 347:talk 288:talk 264:Keep 230:talk 207:talk 175:FENS 149:news 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 567:DGG 466:DGG 429:ian 189:TWL 124:• 120:– ( 615:) 595:) 574:) 551:) 547:• 473:) 453:) 393:) 389:• 353:) 349:• 294:) 290:• 232:) 222:. 209:) 169:) 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 62:) 52:. 611:( 591:( 570:( 543:( 515:( 469:( 449:( 419:B 385:( 345:( 286:( 228:( 205:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 118:) 80:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
The Blade of the Northern Lights
話して下さい
02:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
OneTick
OneTick
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
HighKing
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.