163:
280:. Could you explain how that could be applied? (basically for an article to exist on wikipedia it must be the subject of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources). --—
116:
157:
235:
215:
123:
89:
84:
93:
267:
76:
17:
178:
145:
263:
362:
40:
139:
343:
314:
289:
271:
247:
227:
207:
135:
58:
80:
358:
36:
185:
310:
306:
56:
72:
64:
282:
240:
220:
200:
171:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
357:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
322:: Have to agree here. Some .onion sites are notable but this one comes nowhere near meeting
151:
53:
323:
302:
277:
195:
329:
110:
258:
but rename to OnionMail. The current title is the project's website (
351:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
301:: Sadly no evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails
198:(et al.). I can't find any reliable sources about it at all. —
259:
106:
102:
98:
170:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
365:). No further edits should be made to this page.
236:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
216:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
184:
8:
234:Note: This debate has been included in the
214:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:
213:
7:
276:The basis for the nomination is at
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
344:18:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
315:13:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
290:16:53, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
272:16:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
248:16:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
228:16:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
208:16:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
59:02:59, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
382:
260:http://en.onionmail.info/
354:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
264:Tiptoethrutheminefield
48:The result was
250:
230:
373:
356:
339:
337:
336:
287:
285:
245:
243:
225:
223:
205:
203:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
381:
380:
376:
375:
374:
372:
371:
370:
369:
363:deletion review
352:
334:
332:
330:
283:
281:
241:
239:
221:
219:
201:
199:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
379:
377:
368:
367:
347:
346:
317:
295:
294:
293:
292:
284:Rhododendrites
252:
251:
242:Rhododendrites
231:
222:Rhododendrites
202:Rhododendrites
192:
191:
128:
73:OnionMail.info
67:
65:OnionMail.info
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
378:
366:
364:
360:
355:
349:
348:
345:
342:
341:
340:
325:
321:
318:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
296:
291:
286:
279:
275:
274:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
253:
249:
244:
237:
232:
229:
224:
217:
212:
211:
210:
209:
204:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
353:
350:
328:
327:
319:
298:
255:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
158:free images
307:Wikicology
54:j⚛e decker
359:talk page
37:talk page
361:or in a
117:View log
39:or in a
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
324:WP:GNG
320:Delete
303:WP:GNG
299:Delete
278:WP:GNG
196:WP:GNG
194:Fails
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
331:♦Ian
311:talk
268:talk
256:Keep
238:. —
218:. —
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
326:.--
288:\\
262:).
246:\\
226:\\
206:\\
186:TWL
115:– (
338:M♦
333:Ma
313:)
305:.
270:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
335:c
309:(
266:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.