245:
Administrators are a bunch of useless do-nothings who won't allow for organic growth. Go ahead and delete this if you want to. If you do, I'm leaving. Congratulations. You've made
Knowledge not-fun enough to crush the spirit of a free culture enthusiast. Not to violate WP:NPA, but I do not like you and think you should seriously reconsider your attitude towards this place. I think you're the problem.
281:
Considering the wording of a reaction I understand all too well, it is perhaps understandable that "I'm still writing this page" is included as part of an argument that the rude words have a bearing on the chance of completion. You'll perhaps agree, however, that is somewhat ironic. I do not agree
244:
I'm still writing the article, FFS. Go away you deletionist busybody. What happened to good faith? People like you are ruining
Knowledge. Seriously. I started this article 15 minutes ago and you're already trying to delete it. And Knowledge wonders why they're losing editors! It's because the
435:
I'm aware of that page's advice but disagree with it (it's not a policy or guideline): deficiencies in our articles should be addressed whenever one becomes aware of them, and unprofessional reactions on the part of authors are a problem only these persons are responsible for. Per
421:
It's very poor form to try to delete people's work while they're still working on it. Also, per the wording of the nomination, I'm unconvinced that the nominator actually performed source searching to qualify the nomination to remove this article from the encyclopedia.
415:
on their talk page if a first effort needs deleting;..." and ..."Articles should not be tagged for speedy deletion as having no context (CSD A1) or no content (CSD A3) moments after creation, as not all users will have added full content in their first
396:
Also, quite importantly, the nominator should consider refraining from nominating brand new pages for immediate deletion. The article was created on 19:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC), and was sent to AfD at 20:03, 15 May 2012 (UTC). See also
163:
282:
that tagging hours-old articles, much less nominating them for deletion, is valuable or sound practice, nor do I believe that an indignant reaction to that practice is an actionable indication of the future of an article.
405:, and even if it wasn't, the advice there is stated as, ..."Don't bite the newcomers: cleanup tagging within minutes of creation can discourage new users. Consider using Twinkle to welcome newcomers, and placing
259:
As I said on the article talk page, you are free to start developing articles in your user space, but as soon as they enter main space, they must comply with our inclusion rules. You can still copy your work to
391:- Per the sources provided by User:Anarchangel above. They're in German (which I'm not fluent in), but appear to cover the topic with sufficient detail to qualify as significant coverage.
157:
264:, continue working on it there, and move it back to mainspace as soon as you are certain that you understand our inclusion rules and the article complies with them.
364:
118:
91:
86:
95:
123:
78:
346:
gives it a more brief treatment, although with screenshots, and the authors saw fit to discuss it before any of the other similar items in their list.
204:, "bugger off I'm still writing this page you f**king pond scum robot", I am not entirely confident that improvements will be immediately forthcoming.
493:
Note – It appears that this nomination for deletion has been withdrawn, per the revision in which the nominator changed their opinion to weak keep.
178:
145:
440:, it is up to those who want to keep the article to look for sources beyond a basic Google web and news search, which I performed.
82:
261:
17:
139:
551:
537:
501:
481:
452:
430:
380:
355:
329:
291:
276:
254:
236:
216:
60:
339:
135:
194:
There is no indication of this software receiving third-party coverage by reliable sources, which means that it fails
74:
66:
522:
185:
572:
470:
40:
409:
151:
568:
496:
476:
425:
351:
287:
36:
466:
473:. Anyway, I noticed you revised the nomination as weak keep, so I'm adding the following comment...
398:
171:
250:
368:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
567:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
458:
437:
402:
347:
283:
525:). If that user withdraws and no one else comes forth with a delete !vote then this can be
531:
323:
54:
52:; both the nomination and the only delete !vote have been withdrawn. Non-admin closure. —
340:
https://www.legato.net/download/attachments/2555944/2011_FOSSGIS_Tagungsband.pdf#page=41
547:
516:
443:
316:
267:
227:
224:
per
Anarchangel's sources; coverage is minimal but probably sufficient for notability.
207:
246:
195:
526:
112:
343:
308:
465:
within articles, and not the deletion of articles from the encyclopedia. See
543:
512:
312:
561:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
511:
True, but there is still an outstanding delete !vote from
201:
108:
104:
100:
200:
Considering that the creator reacted to a PROD tag by
170:
321:
Note: This delete !vote has been withdrawn below. —
401:. It's likely that this new article was found at
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
575:). No further edits should be made to this page.
469:regarding reasons for deletion per Knowledge's
344:http://andreas-hubel.de/ba/ba_V2.0.pdf#page=17
338:No hits in News or Books, but two in Scholar:
365:list of Software-related deletion discussions
184:
8:
363:Note: This debate has been included in the
362:
262:User:Miserlou/Open Source Routing Machine
342:discusses the subject at length, and
7:
24:
457:Not to be overly-technical, but
542:I change my vote to weak keep.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
307:: No sign of notability per
319:) 20:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
75:Open Source Routing Machine
67:Open Source Routing Machine
592:
564:Please do not modify it.
552:15:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
538:14:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
502:12:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
482:12:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
453:12:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
431:11:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
381:07:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
356:00:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
330:15:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
292:00:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
277:20:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
255:20:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
237:12:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
217:20:03, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
61:15:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
220:Changed opinion to
48:The result was
500:
480:
451:
429:
383:
332:
275:
235:
215:
583:
566:
536:
499:
497:Northamerica1000
494:
479:
477:Northamerica1000
474:
450:
448:
441:
428:
426:Northamerica1000
423:
414:
408:
403:Special:NewPages
377:
374:
371:
328:
320:
274:
272:
265:
234:
232:
225:
214:
212:
205:
189:
188:
174:
126:
116:
98:
59:
34:
591:
590:
586:
585:
584:
582:
581:
580:
579:
573:deletion review
562:
530:
495:
475:
471:Deletion policy
444:
442:
424:
412:
406:
375:
372:
369:
322:
268:
266:
228:
226:
208:
206:
131:
122:
89:
73:
70:
53:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
589:
587:
578:
577:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
506:
505:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
418:
417:
393:
392:
385:
384:
359:
358:
333:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
192:
191:
128:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
588:
576:
574:
570:
565:
559:
553:
549:
545:
541:
540:
539:
535:
534:
528:
524:
521:
518:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
504:
503:
498:
491:
490:
483:
478:
472:
468:
467:WP:DEL-REASON
464:
460:
456:
455:
454:
449:
447:
439:
434:
433:
432:
427:
420:
419:
416:revision;"...
411:
410:uw-draftfirst
404:
400:
395:
394:
390:
387:
386:
382:
378:
366:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
331:
327:
326:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
302:
293:
289:
285:
280:
279:
278:
273:
271:
263:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
233:
231:
223:
218:
213:
211:
203:
199:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
58:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
563:
560:
532:
519:
492:
462:
445:
399:WP:IMPERFECT
389:Leaning Keep
388:
335:
324:
304:
269:
229:
221:
219:
209:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
527:speedy kept
463:information
348:Anarchangel
284:Anarchangel
158:free images
50:speedy keep
533:KuyaBriBri
461:refers to
446:Sandstein
325:KuyaBriBri
270:Sandstein
230:Sandstein
210:Sandstein
56:KuyaBriBri
569:talk page
459:WP:BURDEN
438:WP:BURDEN
336:Weak keep
222:weak keep
37:talk page
571:or in a
523:contribs
247:Miserlou
119:View log
39:or in a
202:stating
164:WP refs
152:scholar
92:protect
87:history
376:JAMMMY
305:Delete
196:WP:GNG
136:Google
96:delete
367:. ★☆
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
548:talk
544:SL93
517:talk
513:SL93
370:DUCK
352:talk
317:talk
313:SL93
309:WP:N
288:talk
251:talk
172:FENS
146:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
529:. —
379:☆★
186:TWL
121:•
117:– (
550:)
413:}}
407:{{
373:IS
354:)
311:.
290:)
253:)
166:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
546:(
520:·
515:(
350:(
315:(
286:(
249:(
198:.
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.