75:
I think he's notable, but the article was created by someone who works for his company and so once I removed all the spamverstizing there wasn't any content left. No content so delete.
17:
106:
52:
145:
36:
98:. I'd be happy to do it myself, but I think it's better if you can do it and withdraw the AFD at the same time,
144:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
115:
61:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
126:
79:
95:
123:
99:
76:
128:
117:
81:
63:
111:
103:
57:
49:
69:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
88:
138:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
148:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
122:All right, sounds good. Redirecting. --
7:
107:
53:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
44:The result of the debate was
165:
129:06:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
118:04:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
82:04:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
64:07:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
141:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
46:merged and redirected
96:Real Social Dynamics
92:merge and redirect
87:Suggest that you
156:
143:
109:
55:
34:
164:
163:
159:
158:
157:
155:
154:
153:
152:
146:deletion review
139:
73:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
162:
160:
151:
150:
134:
133:
132:
131:
72:
67:
48:by nominator.
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
161:
149:
147:
142:
136:
135:
130:
127:
125:
121:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
105:
101:
97:
93:
90:
86:
85:
84:
83:
80:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
140:
137:
124:Ryan Delaney
104:GeorgeStepan
91:
77:Ryan Delaney
74:
50:GeorgeStepan
45:
43:
31:
28:
70:Owen Cook
89:boldly
16:<
100:Ryan
94:to
102:.
114:\
112:k
108:e
60:\
58:k
54:e
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.