Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Ozon.ru - Knowledge

Source 📝

391:
Most of the references are to primary, otherwise un-reliable sources, or trivial. If this was really the Russian version of Amazon, there would be enough in-depth reliable secondary sources to establish it's notability and pass
251:, with almost all the sources being unacceptable primary source dependant coverage such as press releases. Even if it is considered notable enough, most of the content is fundamentally flawed, failing any semblance of 324:, nomination is without merit. The nom failed miserably in due diligence. One does not have to work hard to find independent sources, sufficient to open ruwiki article. Ozon is Russia's local equivalent of 212: 328:. And the suggestion to merge to rakuten is totally brainless. Press releases , while insufficient for establishing notability, are sources of facts. Wp:promo is matter of cleanup, not deletion. - 271: 165: 206: 112: 97: 344:
The company is quite notable, but it needs to use prose in its history section. I need to take a break from this sort of POV pushing.
172: 92: 85: 17: 56:
argument is quite persuasive. There is consensus here that if this article is to exist, it needs to be rewritten entirely.
287:
Delete: You beat me to it (though I was procrastinating quite a lot)! What notable content there is should be moved to
227: 138: 133: 106: 102: 194: 451: 142: 535: 40: 125: 188: 531: 513: 491: 378: 359: 312: 62: 36: 482:
I tried to clean up, however my edits were reversed. this article needs cleaned of all PR, POV etc --
184: 438: 332: 294: 220: 518: 496: 472: 442: 405: 383: 361: 336: 314: 278: 263: 67: 422: 401: 429:. If the subject is indeed worthy of having an article here, someone better start working up a 234: 275: 260: 259:. A complete reqrite would be required to bring the article in line with Knowledge standards. 256: 248: 81: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
530:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
505: 483: 370: 345: 298: 58: 396:, but there doesn't seem to be. Rewriting the article isn't going to change that either. -- 430: 414: 393: 244: 463: 434: 329: 426: 397: 252: 200: 53: 129: 159: 418: 325: 288: 121: 73: 504:
or draft, this article needs rewritten with reliable sources. --
526:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
454:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
367:
Keep: improve, could be useful, currently it reads like PR
155: 151: 147: 219: 460:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 297:a message as I'm sure he/she has somthing to say. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 538:). No further edits should be made to this page. 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 272:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 233: 8: 425:that any effort to mend & cure would be 413:. The text is such a horrid mess of blatant 113:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 269: 7: 24: 52:. With an article this poor, the 98:Introduction to deletion process 423:grandiose citings without merit 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 88:(AfD)? Read these primers! 555: 68:14:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC) 519:10:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 497:10:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 473:19:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 443:09:15, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 411:Blow it up and start over 406:20:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC) 384:10:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC) 362:14:00, 19 July 2020 (UTC) 337:22:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 315:18:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 279:17:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 264:17:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 528:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 86:Articles for deletion 419:arbitrary assertions 247:. It is also fails 475: 471: 281: 103:Guide to deletion 93:How to contribute 546: 516: 494: 470: 468: 461: 459: 457: 455: 381: 357: 350: 342:Keep and rewrite 310: 303: 238: 237: 223: 175: 163: 145: 83: 66: 34: 554: 553: 549: 548: 547: 545: 544: 543: 542: 536:deletion review 514: 492: 476: 464: 462: 450: 448: 379: 351: 346: 304: 299: 180: 171: 136: 120: 117: 80: 77: 57: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 552: 550: 541: 540: 522: 521: 499: 458: 447: 446: 445: 408: 386: 364: 339: 318: 317: 283: 282: 243:Article fails 241: 240: 177: 116: 115: 110: 100: 95: 78: 76: 71: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 551: 539: 537: 533: 529: 524: 523: 520: 517: 512: 511: 508: 503: 500: 498: 495: 490: 489: 486: 481: 478: 477: 474: 469: 467: 456: 453: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 409: 407: 403: 399: 395: 390: 387: 385: 382: 377: 376: 373: 368: 365: 363: 360: 358: 356: 355: 349: 343: 340: 338: 335: 331: 327: 323: 320: 319: 316: 313: 311: 309: 308: 302: 296: 292: 290: 285: 284: 280: 277: 273: 268: 267: 266: 265: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 236: 232: 229: 226: 222: 218: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 186: 183: 182:Find sources: 178: 174: 170: 167: 161: 157: 153: 149: 144: 140: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 118: 114: 111: 108: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 90: 89: 87: 82: 75: 72: 70: 69: 64: 60: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 527: 525: 509: 506: 501: 487: 484: 479: 465: 449: 410: 388: 374: 371: 366: 353: 352: 347: 341: 321: 306: 305: 300: 286: 242: 230: 224: 216: 209: 203: 197: 191: 181: 168: 79: 49: 47: 31: 28: 322:strong keep 207:free images 466:Sandstein 326:Amazon.com 257:WP:PEACOCK 255:and using 249:WP:COMPANY 532:talk page 435:The Gnome 427:fruitless 415:promotion 330:Altenmann 59:Vanamonde 37:talk page 534:or in a 452:Relisted 398:Adamant1 394:WP:NCORP 295:Melnakxc 245:WP:PROMO 166:View log 107:glossary 39:or in a 480:Comment 293:I sent 289:Rakuten 276:Melmann 261:Melmann 213:WP refs 201:scholar 139:protect 134:history 122:Ozon.ru 84:New to 74:Ozon.ru 507:Devoke 502:Delete 485:Devoke 421:, and 389:Delete 372:Devoke 354:Flappy 348:Darth 307:Flappy 301:Darth 253:WP:MOS 185:Google 143:delete 54:WP:TNT 50:delete 510:water 488:water 431:draft 375:water 333:: --> 228:JSTOR 189:books 173:Stats 160:views 152:watch 148:links 16:< 439:talk 402:talk 334:talk 221:FENS 195:news 156:logs 130:talk 126:edit 63:Talk 433:. - 235:TWL 164:– ( 441:) 417:, 404:) 369:-- 274:. 215:) 158:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 515:@ 493:@ 437:( 400:( 380:@ 291:. 239:) 231:· 225:· 217:· 210:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 187:( 179:( 176:) 169:· 162:) 124:( 109:) 105:( 65:) 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
WP:TNT
Vanamonde
Talk
14:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Ozon.ru

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Ozon.ru
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.