367:
source and not a wiki-esque databse). Source 3 list the film and its cast but provides no commentary or context, website appears to be a sketchier version of iMDB. Source 4 is a one sentence reference to the film. Source 5 is a one sentence reference and source 6 just names the film in a list of Bashar's films. I cannot find evidence of reliable, non-trivial sources existing through a google search. Happy to change my vote if someone can point to such sources existing, but, as far as I can see, they don't.
772:
winner isn't necessary, but for film festival awards being tagged by IMDb as a "nominee" is not a notability criterion in and of itself, and the final winners (or honorable mentions) are the only films that get to claim "notable because award" out of it. As always, of course, films that don't win awards at film festivals can still claim notability on other bases — they just don't get to claim that they're notable
706:
cited in the web page of some production company. Yet, you are certain the reviews "certainly exist" when they could be anything from a multi-page feature to a one-liner in the week's cinema listings. I'm sorry but, though the effort is admirable, we cannot establish notability like this, neither for
501:
Care to point out when and where was the film nominated for an award? Getting the film on a festival program is not the same as being nominated for an award. As to the French
Knowledge entry, it is equally bereft of sources indicating notability. The proffered sources are almost all typical listings
366:
All sources pointed to by
Encyclopædius are trivial except for source 1 which appears to be a one paragraph summary of the film. Source 2 merely lists that the film exists and then gives Bashar Shbib over a dozen producing credits for his work on the film (also no indication that CFO is a reliable
771:
can get tagged as a "nominee" for the People's Choice Award, completely without regard to whether it ever actually had a prayer of winning that.) So film festival awards don't work like Oscars or
Canadian Screen Awards: for the industry awards, being shortlisted is enough and actually being the
341:
416:
or bumped upon online are scarce & trivial mentions in film listings, unworthy of consideration. Geeeting nominated for some award is nothing like winning it. But even so, there's nothing out there dedicated to this film specifically. And I speak French fluently.
766:
automatically tagged as a "nominee" for that stream's final award, regardless of whether it was ever actually under any serious consideration by the award jury or not. (For instance, any feature film that screens at the
344:
390:
about the film says that the film in competition at the Montréal World Film
Festival in 1991. It was considered, at the time, an A-list festival. I guess most of the sources and critiques of the film are in french.
338:
330:
218:
757:
This film has definitely never been an "award nominee" in the sense that's relevant to our notability criteria for films. To be fair, the confusion results from IMDb's structure; the way they do things,
306:
596:
Again: A film participating in a film festival does not mean that the film is nominated for an award, as the Keep suggestions have claimed. Neither does such a participation
212:
171:
286:
466:. I added a translation of the French version. The film was entered in an important festival, and was reviewed in depth by various magazines. Notable enough.
266:
118:
103:
807:, most probably operated by the same person, who are trying for a non-admin close of Keep. A cursory look at the History of this page will confirm it. -
178:
63:
768:
684:
and you will find them. These reviews from almost 30 years ago are not online, but they certainly exist. Once notable always notable.
144:
139:
68:
148:
98:
91:
17:
672:
632:
570:
233:
200:
131:
539:
112:
108:
825:
608:
did not review the film, which was simply mentioned as an entry to a film festival. Nowhere do we have reviews by
435:
863:
40:
194:
708:
58:
488:
190:
396:
859:
846:
816:
789:
748:
724:
693:
649:
583:
523:
492:
475:
456:
426:
400:
376:
372:
356:
318:
298:
278:
258:
73:
36:
413:
347:
240:
712:
780:, because simply being eligible for consideration isn't the same thing as actually being a nominee.
812:
744:
720:
645:
519:
422:
314:
294:
274:
254:
226:
53:
336:
689:
660:
610:
579:
558:
484:
471:
408:. I looked for something substantial but there is nothing out there that could possibly satisfy
135:
785:
529:
392:
87:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
858:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
368:
206:
666:
616:
601:
564:
409:
837:
808:
804:
740:
716:
707:
the time it got released, nor for now. It may be a fine filmic work for all I know but
641:
515:
447:
418:
310:
290:
270:
250:
685:
575:
467:
127:
79:
781:
622:
552:
165:
677:
627:
511:
333:
503:
506:, peppered with irrelevancies (e.g.: Fourlanty, Eric, "Au bout du film",
702:
In other words, all we have of the alleged "reviews" are one-sentence
703:
762:
film that screens in a competitive stream at a film festival is
854:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
828:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
438:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
307:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
680:, an indie production company. Scroll down to the entry on
387:
249:
Non notable film, with no independent 3rd party reviews.
803:: This page has been the target of numerous attacks by
574:. It was notable in 1991. Once notable always notable.
412:. All the sources proffered in the article or above by
161:
157:
153:
225:
640:). It was not notable then; it is not notable now. -
834:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
709:
Knowledge is not a collection of random information
534:
444:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
514:). We have a film hat has sunk without a trace. -
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
866:). No further edits should be made to this page.
305:Note: This discussion has been included in the
285:Note: This discussion has been included in the
265:Note: This discussion has been included in the
483:. Enough sources and award nominations exist.
678:this archive of Oneira Pictures International
239:
8:
119:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
287:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
304:
284:
264:
267:list of Film-related deletion discussions
739:Any news on those "award nominations"? -
636:takes us to an entirely different film (
538:, the film was an official entry at the
604:. The free monthly alternative weekly
7:
769:Toronto International Film Festival
24:
104:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
540:Montreal World Film Festival
94:(AfD)? Read these primers!
883:
847:10:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
817:14:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
790:14:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
749:17:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
725:17:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
694:20:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
650:19:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
584:21:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
524:20:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
493:20:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
476:13:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
457:12:34, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
427:07:56, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
74:22:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
856:Please do not modify it.
401:17:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
377:16:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
357:11:44, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
319:16:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
299:16:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
279:16:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
259:16:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
776:of an award nomination
542:. It was reviewed in
92:Articles for deletion
713:depository of record
388:french wiki article
329:Potential sources
849:
845:
459:
455:
321:
301:
281:
109:Guide to deletion
99:How to contribute
874:
844:
842:
835:
833:
831:
829:
658:The quotes from
454:
452:
445:
443:
441:
439:
354:
244:
243:
229:
181:
169:
151:
89:
34:
882:
881:
877:
876:
875:
873:
872:
871:
870:
864:deletion review
850:
838:
836:
824:
822:
711:and it's not a
676:are taken from
460:
448:
446:
434:
432:
348:
186:
177:
142:
126:
123:
86:
83:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
880:
878:
869:
868:
832:
821:
820:
819:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
752:
751:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
697:
696:
653:
652:
630:attributed to
589:
588:
587:
586:
532:in the weekly
530:Éric Fourlanty
496:
495:
478:
442:
431:
430:
429:
403:
380:
379:
360:
359:
323:
322:
302:
282:
247:
246:
183:
122:
121:
116:
106:
101:
84:
82:
77:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
879:
867:
865:
861:
857:
852:
851:
848:
843:
841:
830:
827:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
799:
798:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
770:
765:
761:
756:
755:
754:
753:
750:
746:
742:
738:
737:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
705:
701:
700:
699:
698:
695:
691:
687:
683:
682:Love $ Greed
679:
675:
674:
669:
668:
663:
662:
657:
656:
655:
654:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
634:
629:
625:
624:
619:
618:
613:
612:
607:
603:
599:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
585:
581:
577:
573:
572:
567:
566:
561:
560:
555:
554:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
531:
528:According to
527:
526:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
500:
499:
498:
497:
494:
490:
486:
485:Expertwikiguy
482:
479:
477:
473:
469:
465:
462:
461:
458:
453:
451:
440:
437:
428:
424:
420:
415:
414:Encyclopædius
411:
407:
404:
402:
398:
394:
389:
385:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
365:
362:
361:
358:
355:
353:
352:
351:Encyclopædius
345:
342:
339:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
303:
300:
296:
292:
288:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
242:
238:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
192:
189:
188:Find sources:
184:
180:
176:
173:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
146:
141:
137:
133:
129:
128:Love $ Greed
125:
124:
120:
117:
114:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
96:
95:
93:
88:
81:
80:Love $ Greed
78:
76:
75:
72:
71:
67:
66:
62:
61:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
855:
853:
839:
823:
800:
777:
773:
763:
759:
681:
671:
665:
659:
637:
631:
621:
615:
609:
605:
597:
569:
563:
557:
551:
547:
543:
533:
507:
480:
463:
449:
433:
405:
393:Eshko Timiou
383:
363:
350:
349:
326:
248:
236:
230:
222:
215:
209:
203:
197:
187:
174:
85:
69:
64:
59:
54:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
805:sockpuppets
667:L'actualité
617:L'actualité
565:L'actualité
510:, 1991; or
369:Samsmachado
213:free images
840:Sandstein
626:. And the
602:notability
450:Sandstein
860:talk page
809:The Gnome
741:The Gnome
717:The Gnome
673:La Presse
642:The Gnome
633:La Presse
623:Séquences
571:La Presse
553:Séquences
548:24 images
516:The Gnome
419:The Gnome
311:Donaldd23
291:Donaldd23
271:Donaldd23
251:Donaldd23
55:King of ♥
37:talk page
862:or in a
826:Relisted
686:Aymatth2
576:Aymatth2
502:such as
468:Aymatth2
436:Relisted
410:WP:NFILM
172:View log
113:glossary
39:or in a
801:Comment
782:Bearcat
774:because
661:Variety
638:Trilogy
611:Variety
600:confer
559:Variety
219:WP refs
207:scholar
145:protect
140:history
90:New to
778:per se
764:always
704:blurbs
620:, or
598:per se
406:Delete
364:Delete
191:Google
149:delete
760:every
234:JSTOR
195:books
179:Stats
166:views
158:watch
154:links
16:<
813:talk
786:talk
745:talk
721:talk
690:talk
670:and
646:talk
628:link
606:Voir
580:talk
568:and
544:Voir
535:Voir
520:talk
512:this
508:Voir
504:this
489:talk
481:Keep
472:talk
464:Keep
423:talk
397:talk
386:The
384:Keep
373:talk
327:Keep
315:talk
295:talk
275:talk
255:talk
227:FENS
201:news
162:logs
136:talk
132:edit
715:. -
241:TWL
170:– (
815:)
788:)
747:)
723:)
692:)
664:,
648:)
614:,
582:)
562:,
556:,
550:,
546:,
522:)
491:)
474:)
425:)
399:)
375:)
346:†
343:,
340:,
335:,
332:,
317:)
309:.
297:)
289:.
277:)
269:.
257:)
221:)
164:|
160:|
156:|
152:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
52:.
811:(
784:(
743:(
719:(
688:(
644:(
578:(
518:(
487:(
470:(
421:(
417:-
395:(
371:(
313:(
293:(
273:(
253:(
245:)
237:·
231:·
223:·
216:·
210:·
204:·
198:·
193:(
185:(
182:)
175:·
168:)
130:(
115:)
111:(
70:♠
65:♣
60:♦
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.