Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 371 - Knowledge

Source 📝

404:, because if I did, very few of the bus routes would survive AFD. I concede that I was treating this as a case where there is apparently either a guideline or an unpublished guideline that normally applies to London bus routes. I also noted that there is a redirect category for London bus routes, which seems to imply that someone thinks that London bus routes are worth keeping track of, and they can't be kept tracked of unless they are in the encyclopedia. 438:- I know that it is very much the Knowledge way to select a group of volunteers to whom one does not belong and dump on them for not doing enough or for making mistakes. It is very popular for non-AFC volunteers to dump on AFC. We get dumped on for not accepting things that could be fixed in article space. We get dumped on for accepting things. So sometimes a reviewer has to be 379:. Approximately 10% of them are notable because they have a long history that dates back almost a century. A route created in the 1990's and with barely any coverage other than tenders and one single incident doesn't make the cut. The route that it was carved out of (71) is also non notable. 590:- As Ajf773 points out, London bus routes are only notable a small proportion of the time. There's no such thing as inherent or automatic notability. This topic needs specific and substantial coverage, but it just hasn't got it. 206: 400:- I compared this to other London bus routes, all listed, that have articles and that do not have articles. This seemed comparable to other London bus routes that have articles. I concede that I wasn't following 237:
Somehow this slipped through the AfC process however there is notable about this route. Routine coverage about tender results and self published sources from bus fansites are are not independent secondary sources.
564:. As the nominator indicates, there isn't actual coverage on which to build an article; it's all routine. While some routes may be notable, nothing in the sources suggests this particular one is. -- 341:
London bus routes are usually notable as there is an extensive literature about them. This one is no exception as there are already plenty of sources and there's plenty more to be found including
421:- As to overriding what was previously there, what was previously there was a redirect to the list of London bus routes, which is what is there for all London bus routes that don't have articles. 255: 200: 159: 275: 106: 132: 127: 91: 459:- "This seems to be comparable to other articles on London bus routes. It should probably be accepted." I answered your question before you asked it. 136: 166: 119: 551: 221: 188: 86: 79: 17: 497:
So you support a source without demonstrating that the works provide any significant notability for this individual route?
182: 603: 580: 556: 535: 506: 488: 468: 451: 430: 413: 388: 366: 333: 314: 310: 287: 267: 247: 123: 100: 96: 61: 573: 517: 178: 620: 464: 447: 426: 409: 362: 40: 228: 484: 306: 115: 67: 616: 531: 376: 36: 477: 460: 443: 422: 405: 358: 300: 194: 328: 214: 57: 480: 546: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
615:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
527: 502: 384: 283: 263: 243: 322:
as not notable. Not sure how this was created, did this override what was previously here?
597: 439: 323: 53: 401: 153: 498: 380: 279: 259: 239: 591: 566: 611:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
520:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
355:
The London LS: The Leyland National Bus In London Service
149: 145: 141: 213: 526:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 256:
list of Transportation-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 623:). No further edits should be made to this page. 274:Note: This discussion has been included in the 254:Note: This discussion has been included in the 442:and decide that an article might survive AFD. 227: 8: 276:list of England-related deletion discussions 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 343:London's Buses: The Colourful Era 1985-2005 273: 253: 305:What were your reasons for accepting? 7: 347:London Buses in the 1970s, 1970–1974 24: 351:London Bus Liveries: A Miscellany 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 402:general notability guidelines 604:10:52, 11 August 2020 (UTC) 581:01:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC) 476:I support the comment from 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 62:02:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC) 640: 557:20:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC) 536:00:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC) 507:09:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC) 489:09:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC) 469:19:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 452:19:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 431:19:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 414:19:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 389:20:26, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 367:09:47, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 334:09:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 315:08:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 288:21:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 268:21:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 248:21:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 613:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 116:London Buses route 371 68:London Buses route 371 545:per nom's arguments. 80:Articles for deletion 375:No they aren't, see 569: 567: 538: 307:Curb Safe Charmer 290: 270: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 631: 579: 554: 525: 523: 521: 304: 232: 231: 217: 169: 157: 139: 77: 34: 639: 638: 634: 633: 632: 630: 629: 628: 627: 621:deletion review 602: 578: 565: 552: 539: 516: 514: 461:Robert McClenon 444:Robert McClenon 423:Robert McClenon 406:Robert McClenon 301:Robert McClenon 298: 174: 165: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 637: 635: 626: 625: 607: 606: 596: 584: 583: 572: 559: 524: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 492: 491: 471: 454: 433: 416: 394: 393: 392: 391: 377:WP:BUSOUTCOMES 370: 369: 336: 317: 292: 291: 271: 235: 234: 171: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 636: 624: 622: 618: 614: 609: 608: 605: 601: 600: 595: 594: 589: 586: 585: 582: 577: 576: 570: 563: 560: 558: 555: 550: 549: 544: 541: 540: 537: 533: 529: 522: 519: 508: 504: 500: 496: 495: 494: 493: 490: 486: 482: 481:Olaf Kosinsky 479: 475: 472: 470: 466: 462: 458: 455: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 434: 432: 428: 424: 420: 417: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 396: 395: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 372: 371: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 337: 335: 332: 331: 327: 326: 321: 318: 316: 312: 308: 302: 297: 294: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 272: 269: 265: 261: 257: 252: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 230: 226: 223: 220: 216: 212: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 180: 177: 176:Find sources: 172: 168: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 612: 610: 598: 592: 587: 574: 561: 548:YorkshireLad 547: 542: 515: 473: 456: 435: 418: 397: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 329: 324: 319: 295: 236: 224: 218: 210: 203: 197: 191: 185: 175: 162: 73: 49: 47: 31: 28: 528:Ad Orientem 201:free images 357:; &c. 617:talk page 54:Barkeep49 37:talk page 619:or in a 518:Relisted 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 457:Comment 440:be bold 436:Comment 419:Comment 398:Comment 296:Comment 207:WP refs 195:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 588:Delete 562:Delete 543:Delete 499:Ajf773 478:Andrew 381:Ajf773 359:Andrew 320:Delete 280:Ajf773 260:Ajf773 240:Ajf773 179:Google 137:delete 50:delete 325:Night 222:JSTOR 183:books 167:Stats 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 593:Reyk 568:Kinu 532:talk 503:talk 485:talk 474:Keep 465:talk 448:talk 427:talk 410:talk 385:talk 363:talk 339:Keep 330:fury 311:talk 284:talk 264:talk 244:talk 215:FENS 189:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 599:YO! 361:🐉( 229:TWL 158:– ( 553:✿ 534:) 505:) 487:) 467:) 450:) 429:) 412:) 387:) 365:) 353:; 349:; 345:; 313:) 286:) 278:. 266:) 258:. 246:) 209:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 575:c 571:/ 530:( 501:( 483:( 463:( 446:( 425:( 408:( 383:( 309:( 303:: 299:@ 282:( 262:( 242:( 233:) 225:· 219:· 211:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 181:( 173:( 170:) 163:· 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Barkeep49
talk
02:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
London Buses route 371

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
London Buses route 371
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.