838:
Although, I'd guess you'd be fine citing it when someone is saying something about another keep voter. Anyway, your assertion that it's significantly harder to keep articles is obvious bullshit. One, because there's millions of articles in
Knowledge that never go to AfD in the first place. Also though, the requirement of two in-depth sources is an extremely low bar that any notable subject able to easily pass. I find it pretty hilarious how much capitulating keep voters usually do even over that though. It's almost like everything has to be handed to them on a silver platter and that there shouldn't be any notability guidelines at all. BTW, this is called "articles for deletion" for a reason. I.E. there's going to be a major slant toward non-notable articles being posted here, because that's literally what it's for. It's not "articles for keeping" or "neutral articles that just exist and no one cares about." All the complaints about this by keep voters is like going to a waste compound place, complaining about all the garbage there, and then criticizing all the waste disposal people for doing their jobs. --
887:
then they can call it done, nominators have to exhaustively check everywhere to make sure there aren't any. Then they have to combat the endless barrage of personal attacks and clearly fraudulent votes. Neither of which is particularly easy. You can just post about an article on ARS to and have a bunch of people come to vote keep based on absolutely nothing so the article is kept. Nominators don't have that options. So, spare me the complaints about how hard this is. Neither side is great to be on, but it's much more harder and more mentally taxing to be a nominator. Period. Anyway, I think we should leave it at that so other people can have a chance to participate. AfDs aren't for personal discussions or grievances. --
573:
522:
514:
618:
610:
602:
565:
557:
530:
881:
I never claimed you said more then that. You don't have to though. It's an uncalled for and off topic comment, that you should have been more sensitive about making. Especially considering the current slandering campaign going on about me in relation to it. That your comment only feeds into. Which, I
886:
is simply wrong and other stuff existing isn't relevant to this anyway. Also, it's not on me that there's a lot of work involved in this. It's not like there isn't a lot of involved when nominating things to do the proper research behand. While keep voters just have to find two in-depth sources and
837:
Are you saying my opinion about sourcing isn't valid because I've nominated articles related to Africa before? If so, it's a little mediocre of you to do so. Especially since I said the first source is fine. I would cite AGF, but I'm sure your already aware of it and are just choosing to ignore it.
797:
I'll say the first source works. The second one though, not so much. Them having a debate (and getting coverage somewhere for it) are extrmely trivial. Most schools have debates. The article doesn't even talk about the school even in passing. Let alone is there anything in-depth on it. As should be
852:
I have said nothing about you apart from the fact you have nominated several
African schools for deletion in a short time frame. I contribute to African topics when I can and I'm pretty decent at finding local sources online. When someone nominates an article for deletion, the article is
853:
undersourced, but the article is notable, it's on keep !voters to demonstrate the article's notability. Given the fact there are a dozen similar articles all up for deletion simultaneously, all of them are from an undercovered area of
Knowledge, and most to all of them seem to have
812:
You've nominated quite a few
African schools for deletion in a short time frame. While this one wasn't specifically your nomination, I stopped at the first two sources, since it is significantly more difficult to keep articles than it is to delete them.
1047:
193:
857:-qualifying coverage in local sources, it's quite a bit of work to do the research to demonstrate their notability. So it's not "obvious bullshit," and I please ask that you retract that statement.
687:
I will chime in by replying that the book covering this school and cited in the article certainly has significant coverage, even more so than the newspaper article that you agree does so.
187:
481:
154:
763:
127:
122:
131:
317:
289:
114:
261:
340:
This school clearly fails the notability guidelines. Since there's no in-depth secondary coverage about it anywhere. It's to bad the AfD was even necessary. --
101:
86:
639:
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using
917:
761:
208:
175:
920:", presented by SportingFlyer. I believe that this demonstrates notability. I apologize if anyone finds this comment mentally taxing. —
871:
827:
783:
118:
398:
Firstly this is not mere inclusion in a directory, but hundreds of words of prose and the equivalent of an infobox. And secondly, per
594:
1063:
1036:
1006:
979:
929:
896:
876:
847:
832:
807:
788:
746:
732:
717:
696:
682:
451:
423:
393:
363:
349:
329:
309:
281:
253:
169:
56:
81:
74:
17:
110:
62:
165:
643:
215:
95:
91:
1015:
988:
1080:
40:
863:
819:
775:
486:
181:
692:
419:
359:
354:
Really? What about the in-depth secondary coverage that I cited in the article before you commented here?
1076:
973:
662:
36:
459:. Here's a source assessment table. I'm also requesting others to review this and chime in by replying.
742:
713:
491:
368:
Inclusion in directories (CIS International
Schools Directory 2009/10) is considered as trivial per
1002:
925:
325:
201:
916:: I agree that the L'express article is a good source, and so is the article from Le Mauricien, "
892:
858:
843:
814:
803:
770:
407:
369:
345:
964:
addressing the subject directly and in depth. None of the Keep votes has showed actual SIGCOV.
946:
688:
675:
595:
https://www.lexpress.mu/article/368553/international-baccalaureate-955-taux-reussite-au-bocage
438:
415:
399:
386:
355:
302:
274:
246:
229:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1075:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
882:
assume is why you made it. Anyway, your claim all the AfDs related to schools in Africa pass
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
968:
961:
950:
233:
1059:
738:
709:
665:
explicitly mentions that multiple qualified sources are needed to establish notability.
1027:
998:
942:
921:
727:
658:
446:
373:
321:
1051:
938:
888:
883:
854:
839:
799:
766:
497:
442:
411:
403:
341:
225:
1050:
cited in the page already provide significant and detailed coverage, enough to pass
957:
954:
668:
469:
379:
295:
267:
239:
53:
148:
1055:
506:
760:
Had difficulty finding sources until I searched specifically in French.
918:
Le Bocage fête ses 25 ans : Une approche cosmopolite de l’éducation
1071:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1018:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
991:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
144:
140:
136:
441:, schools are not inherently notable and need to pass
200:
737:
GNG, obviously. Which ones were you thinking of? --
1024:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
997:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1083:). No further edits should be made to this page.
798:obvious, name drops don't count for notability.
316:Note: This discussion has been included in the
288:Note: This discussion has been included in the
260:Note: This discussion has been included in the
708:. Appears to satisfy notability guidelines. --
318:list of Education-related deletion discussions
290:list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions
214:
8:
262:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
551:CIS International Schools Directory 2009/10
507:http://www.lebocage.net/index.php/about-us
462:
315:
287:
259:
1046:. The article from Le Mauricien, and
468:Source assessment table: prepared by
7:
24:
616:
608:
600:
571:
563:
555:
528:
520:
512:
87:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
406:, schools do not have to pass
111:Le Bocage International School
63:Le Bocage International School
1:
1064:02:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
57:14:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
1037:09:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
1007:03:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
980:22:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
930:19:46, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
897:18:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
877:18:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
848:18:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
833:18:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
808:13:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
789:11:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
747:10:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
733:08:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
718:16:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
697:20:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
683:20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
452:14:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
424:20:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
394:20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
364:16:23, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
350:14:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
330:13:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
310:12:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
282:12:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
254:12:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
657:Only one source qualifies.
617:
609:
601:
564:
560:Not from the school itself
556:
529:
445:; this school doesn't pass
77:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1100:
572:
521:
513:
376:also mentions "multiple".
236:regarding the said school.
949:. Sources in article and
637:
465:
1073:Please do not modify it.
937:: Article does not meet
32:Please do not modify it.
232:. I couldn't find any
621:Features achievement
492:Significant coverage?
75:Articles for deletion
496:Count source toward
1048:the book by Bingham
644:source assess table
402:, which is part of
976:
972:
533:Covers basic info
1039:
1035:
1009:
974:
966:
654:
653:
650:
597:
552:
509:
332:
312:
284:
92:Guide to deletion
82:How to contribute
1091:
1034:
1032:
1025:
1023:
1021:
1019:
996:
994:
992:
978:
874:
866:
830:
822:
786:
778:
730:
680:
678:
673:
671:
648:
642:
638:
630:
629:
620:
619:
612:
611:
604:
603:
593:
585:
584:
575:
574:
567:
566:
559:
558:
550:
542:
541:
532:
531:
524:
523:
516:
515:
505:
463:
449:
391:
389:
384:
382:
307:
305:
300:
298:
279:
277:
272:
270:
251:
249:
244:
242:
224:Non-notable per
219:
218:
204:
152:
134:
72:
34:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1081:deletion review
1040:
1028:
1026:
1014:
1012:
1010:
987:
985:
965:
870:
862:
826:
818:
782:
774:
728:
676:
674:
669:
667:
646:
640:
625:
624:
580:
579:
568:Published book
537:
536:
525:Self-published
517:Self-published
473:
447:
387:
385:
380:
378:
303:
301:
296:
294:
275:
273:
268:
266:
247:
245:
240:
238:
161:
125:
109:
106:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1097:
1095:
1086:
1085:
1067:
1066:
1022:
1011:
995:
984:
983:
982:
932:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
792:
791:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
721:
720:
702:
701:
700:
699:
663:WP:MULTSOURCES
652:
651:
635:
634:
622:
614:
606:
598:
590:
589:
577:
569:
561:
553:
547:
546:
534:
526:
518:
510:
502:
501:
494:
489:
484:
479:
475:
474:
466:
461:
460:
454:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
334:
333:
313:
285:
222:
221:
158:
105:
104:
99:
89:
84:
67:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1096:
1084:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1038:
1033:
1031:
1020:
1017:
1008:
1004:
1000:
993:
990:
981:
977:
970:
963:
959:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
933:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
912:
911:
898:
894:
890:
885:
880:
879:
878:
875:
873:
867:
865:
860:
859:SportingFlyer
856:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
836:
835:
834:
831:
829:
823:
821:
816:
815:SportingFlyer
811:
810:
809:
805:
801:
796:
795:
794:
793:
790:
787:
785:
779:
777:
772:
771:SportingFlyer
768:
764:
762:
759:
756:
755:
748:
744:
740:
736:
735:
734:
731:
725:
724:
723:
722:
719:
715:
711:
707:
704:
703:
698:
694:
690:
686:
685:
684:
681:
679:
672:
664:
660:
656:
655:
645:
636:
633:
628:
623:
615:
607:
599:
596:
592:
591:
588:
583:
578:
570:
562:
554:
549:
548:
545:
540:
535:
527:
519:
511:
508:
504:
503:
499:
495:
493:
490:
488:
485:
483:
480:
477:
476:
472:
471:
464:
458:
455:
453:
450:
444:
440:
436:
433:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:
395:
392:
390:
383:
375:
371:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
339:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
311:
308:
306:
299:
291:
286:
283:
280:
278:
271:
263:
258:
257:
256:
255:
252:
250:
243:
235:
231:
227:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
167:
164:
163:Find sources:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
78:
76:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1072:
1070:
1043:
1029:
1013:
986:
934:
913:
869:
861:
825:
817:
781:
773:
757:
726:Which ones?
705:
689:Phil Bridger
666:
631:
626:
586:
581:
543:
538:
482:Independent?
470:User:Hiwilms
467:
456:
434:
416:Phil Bridger
377:
356:Phil Bridger
337:
293:
265:
237:
223:
211:
205:
197:
190:
184:
178:
172:
162:
68:
49:
47:
31:
28:
414:is enough.
408:WP:ORGDEPTH
370:WP:ORGDEPTH
188:free images
1030:Sandstein
947:WP:NSCHOOL
739:Necrothesp
710:Necrothesp
613:Published
576:Directory
439:WP:NSCHOOL
400:WP:NSCHOOL
230:WP:NSCHOOL
1077:talk page
999:Barkeep49
962:WP:SIGCOV
951:WP:BEFORE
922:Toughpigs
765:. Passes
729:Spiderone
487:Reliable?
448:Spiderone
437:- as per
322:Shellwood
234:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
1079:or in a
1016:Relisted
989:Relisted
953:are not
889:Adamant1
840:Adamant1
800:Adamant1
342:Adamant1
155:View log
96:glossary
39:or in a
969:Timothy
943:WP:NORG
670:Hiwilms
659:WP:SIRS
478:Source
457:Comment
381:Hiwilms
374:WP:SIRS
297:Hiwilms
269:Hiwilms
241:Hiwilms
194:WP refs
182:scholar
128:protect
123:history
73:New to
54:Spartaz
1052:WP:GNG
939:WP:GNG
935:Delete
884:WP:GNG
855:WP:GNG
767:WP:GNG
443:WP:GNG
435:Delete
412:WP:GNG
404:WP:ORG
338:Delete
226:WP:ORG
166:Google
132:delete
1056:Nsk92
960:with
958:WP:RS
955:WP:IS
605:News
209:JSTOR
170:books
149:views
141:watch
137:links
16:<
1060:talk
1044:Keep
1003:talk
975:talk
926:talk
914:Keep
893:talk
844:talk
804:talk
758:Keep
743:talk
714:talk
706:Keep
693:talk
677:Talk
420:talk
388:Talk
360:talk
346:talk
326:talk
304:Talk
276:Talk
248:Talk
202:FENS
176:news
145:logs
119:talk
115:edit
50:keep
971:::
967://
941:or
632:Yes
498:GNG
216:TWL
153:– (
1062:)
1054:.
1005:)
945:/
928:)
895:)
846:)
806:)
769:.
745:)
716:)
695:)
647:}}
641:{{
587:No
544:No
500:?
422:)
410::
372:.
362:)
348:)
328:)
320:.
292:.
264:.
228:,
196:)
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
52:.
1058:(
1001:(
924:(
891:(
872:C
868:·
864:T
842:(
828:C
824:·
820:T
802:(
784:C
780:·
776:T
741:(
712:(
691:(
661:/
649:.
627:✔
582:✘
539:✘
418:(
358:(
344:(
324:(
220:)
212:·
206:·
198:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
168:(
160:(
157:)
151:)
113:(
98:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.