Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Liquidation Channel - Knowledge

Source 📝

502:
isn't a policy. It isn't even a guideline. It is an essay. While essays are often useful, and I don't doubt that most of the time this essay is, at the end of the day, we assume nothing, including notability. In this case, we have a minor channel that is literally one big commercial. This is the
440:, Just because it's perceived to be a "low-notability" shopping channel doesn't mean it's not article-worthy. It's carried on the two major satellite providers in the United States as well as most cable systems. If other low-tier shopping channels merit a listing, so should the Liquidation Channel. 461:
Again, if it was the neutral version I linked to from 2011, it would be an easy keep. This barely talks about the channel itself, but a bunch of websites, blogs and 'who cares' information about how the company gets their product.
404:, which owns the network. That's my concern, that it's become a mission statement for VGL rather than a neutral encyclopedia article. Actually read my rationale for deletion, please; we don't keep blatant ads for companies here. 284:
This is a very low-notability shopping channel, but this version of the article can't be rescued. Should be focused on the channel's history, not how many mines it leases products from and its shipping policies. Sadly,
170: 507:, which trumps all policies, and say that without proper references, we can't say it passes our criteria for inclusion. I'm guessing, and hoping, that this will get relisted so more eyes can look at it. 266: 164: 123: 56:
TV channels are notable. There are no sources in the article or in the older version linked to by EBY) and none of the participants seems to have found significant coverage.
503:
type of channel that cables companies don't have to pay for, the channel pays the cable companies to be included. Short of rock solid references, that fact lets us apply
236: 289:
of the article from 2011 is the most neutral version that can be found. Finally, every edit since May 2014 looks like it's been made by a walled garden of possible
251: 96: 91: 130: 100: 83: 397: 185: 152: 17: 223: 146: 548: 519: 486: 449: 428: 374: 345: 321: 273: 258: 243: 228: 65: 579: 40: 142: 87: 391: 192: 514: 575: 504: 387: 342: 270: 255: 240: 36: 61: 366: 499: 477: 419: 400:) editing the article with promotional information who just happens to be part of a company called 370: 358: 312: 178: 79: 71: 158: 544: 508: 445: 221: 202: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
574:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
529: 331: 206: 57: 465: 407: 300: 213:
be enough out there to warrant a page about this company, it would make more sense to
362: 290: 214: 52:. As Dennis remarks, WP:BROADCAST is only an essay and even that does not claim that 540: 441: 294: 218: 117: 532:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
334:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
297:
editors usually don't edit shopping/infomercial channel articles.
568:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
267:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
217:
than to work from this advert masquerading as an article.
386:
Since when did we not enforce COI?! We have a user named
357:. Television channels are presumed notable according to 286: 113: 109: 105: 177: 539:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 341:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 582:). No further edits should be made to this page. 237:list of Television-related deletion discussions 252:list of Business-related deletion discussions 191: 8: 265:Note: This debate has been included in the 250:Note: This debate has been included in the 235:Note: This debate has been included in the 293:accounts that's gone unnoticed since most 264: 249: 234: 7: 24: 365:is not a reason for deletion. -- 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 205:with no apparent support from 1: 549:23:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC) 520:22:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC) 487:16:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC) 450:19:04, 25 October 2014 (UTC) 429:16:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC) 375:21:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 346:22:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC) 322:00:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 274:16:28, 10 October 2014 (UTC) 259:16:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC) 244:16:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC) 229:08:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC) 66:15:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC) 599: 498:I would remind folks that 571:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 402:Vaibhav Global Limited 215:delete and start over 207:independent sources 203:promotional article 80:Liquidation Channel 72:Liquidation Channel 558:Revert & Keep 551: 484: 426: 348: 319: 276: 261: 246: 590: 573: 562: 561: 538: 534: 485: 480: 474: 473: 468: 427: 422: 416: 415: 410: 340: 336: 320: 315: 309: 308: 303: 196: 195: 181: 133: 121: 103: 34: 598: 597: 593: 592: 591: 589: 588: 587: 586: 580:deletion review 569: 527: 478: 471: 466: 463: 420: 413: 408: 405: 329: 313: 306: 301: 298: 226: 209:. Whilst there 138: 129: 94: 78: 75: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 596: 594: 585: 584: 564: 563: 554: 553: 552: 536: 535: 524: 523: 522: 505:WP:COMMONSENSE 492: 491: 490: 489: 453: 452: 434: 433: 432: 431: 378: 377: 351: 350: 349: 338: 337: 326: 325: 324: 278: 277: 262: 247: 224: 199: 198: 135: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 595: 583: 581: 577: 572: 566: 565: 559: 556: 555: 550: 546: 542: 537: 533: 531: 526: 525: 521: 518: 517: 512: 511: 506: 501: 497: 494: 493: 488: 483: 481: 470: 469: 460: 457: 456: 455: 454: 451: 447: 443: 439: 436: 435: 430: 425: 423: 412: 411: 403: 399: 396: 393: 389: 388:Vaibhavhitesh 385: 382: 381: 380: 379: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 353: 352: 347: 344: 339: 335: 333: 328: 327: 323: 318: 316: 305: 304: 296: 292: 288: 283: 280: 279: 275: 272: 268: 263: 260: 257: 253: 248: 245: 242: 238: 233: 232: 231: 230: 227: 222: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 194: 190: 187: 184: 180: 176: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 144: 141: 140:Find sources: 136: 132: 128: 125: 119: 115: 111: 107: 102: 98: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 76: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 570: 567: 557: 528: 515: 509: 500:WP:BROADCAST 495: 475: 464: 458: 437: 417: 406: 401: 394: 383: 359:WP:BROADCAST 354: 343:NorthAmerica 330: 310: 299: 287:this version 281: 271:NorthAmerica 256:NorthAmerica 241:NorthAmerica 210: 200: 188: 182: 174: 167: 161: 155: 149: 139: 126: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 165:free images 58:Randykitty 576:talk page 367:Sammy1339 37:talk page 578:or in a 530:Relisted 398:contribs 332:Relisted 124:View log 39:or in a 541:Natg 19 479:chatter 459:Comment 442:Nemalki 421:chatter 384:Comment 314:chatter 219:Yunshui 201:Highly 171:WP refs 159:scholar 97:protect 92:history 510:Dennis 496:Delete 363:WP:COI 361:, and 291:WP:COI 282:Delete 143:Google 101:delete 50:Delete 295:WP:TV 211:might 186:JSTOR 147:books 131:Stats 118:views 110:watch 106:links 16:< 545:talk 467:Nate 446:talk 438:Keep 409:Nate 392:talk 371:talk 355:Keep 302:Nate 179:FENS 153:news 114:logs 88:talk 84:edit 62:talk 193:TWL 122:– ( 54:all 560:. 547:) 516:2¢ 513:- 448:) 373:) 269:. 254:. 239:. 173:) 116:| 112:| 108:| 104:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 64:) 543:( 482:) 476:( 472:• 444:( 424:) 418:( 414:• 395:· 390:( 369:( 317:) 311:( 307:• 225:水 197:) 189:· 183:· 175:· 168:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 145:( 137:( 134:) 127:· 120:) 82:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Randykitty
talk
15:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Liquidation Channel
Liquidation Channel
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
promotional article
independent sources

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.