622:
take for the other one (due to delays, etc., just as illustration, a friend of mine bought a condo in a tower that has been under construction for a while; supposedly the parking should have been done by last
November, and the rest by June 2010, as of now the parking is still not done and the finished condo is expected by May 2011). It's the same as with
348:. While I generally think that "Tallest Buildings" are a legitimate list topic, not being able to come up with 10 good entries indicates that this is a list not ready for primetime and that the relevant information about the biggest few buildings could be neatly merged into the main article. —Carrite, Sept. 22, 2010.
859:
How is it reasonably sourced? Of the whole list only the first three buildings have a single source in their article (one of these looks like a marketing video on youtube), the others have no article and no sources. We have no source at all to say (in combined/comparative terms) these are the tallest
621:
are two different things. That a building is proposed or under construction can be verified, but unless the proposal or the construction itself are notable, the articles shouldn't be made ahead of time. We cannot predict whether the proposed building will ever be built, or how long construction will
517:- unencyclopedic cross-categorization ("tall" building, random city), list not long or notable enough to be meaningful. Of the completed buildings, we're talking about 16 floors max, 12 for most of them, that's just not notable at all and certainly not enough (too trivial) to call for a merge.--
507:- This one is back via Deletion Review after a bit of a premature closure. I still think MERGE is the correct result for this very specific "Tallest Buildings" list due to the lack of tall buildings in Timișoara. If there were 10 good entries, I'd have no issues with it, speaking for myself. —
832:
Actually, the size of the city should have no bearing on whether or not these lists should exist. It just makes no sense for cities with few tall buildings to even have tallest buildings list. IMO, all of them should be merged back to the city
169:
702:
I've read the notability guidelines and being the tallest building isn't mentioned at all. Being the tallest maybe of interest to the world i.e. causes them to take note - but in and of itself doesn't meet the notability guidelines.
239:
Per nom. No value added to the encyclopedia by having such a silly list. I might support a merge, too, although I hesitate given how goofy a precedent it might set for future lists of "Tallest
Buildings" in any given municipality.
163:
200:
unless the list contains a lot of notable buildings (ie those with their own article), then it is not worth creating such articles. the notable buildings can easily be mentioned in city's article.
97:
92:
101:
814:
Reasonably sourced and we have similar articles for similarly sized US cities. While sourcing is lighter here, that may be due to language or other issues. It meets WP:N as far as I can see.
84:
634:
in the present, articles shouldn't be made in anticipation of future notability. Besides, even if the buildings were completed now, I doubt they would pass the notability guidelines.--
124:
575:
actually, WP:CRYSTAL clearly says "Knowledge is not a collection of unverifiable speculation." Both of the buildings are verified with sources and therefore are not violations.
764:
129:
860:
buldings, perhaps we should rename it to "List of buildings in order of height for where wikipedia editors have found some sort of source...", which is what it is, a
738:
88:
790:
184:
151:
80:
72:
873:
854:
823:
805:
779:
753:
716:
693:
643:
597:
563:
526:
499:
465:
443:
407:
380:
336:
313:
293:
275:
255:
231:
209:
66:
841:
430:
145:
635:
555:
518:
663:. Keep in mind some buildings with lesser notability claims have had articles up to 2 years before the actual building was completed (see
655:- Do you not think that if a building is to be the tallest in Romania or Southwest Europe is notable? Both of these claims are cited in
141:
223:
191:
865:
708:
17:
157:
675:
579:
481:
704:
403:
888:
847:
436:
36:
887:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
639:
559:
522:
324:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
660:
376:
656:
453:
227:
399:
250:
835:
424:
869:
712:
177:
801:
775:
749:
627:
610:
547:
459:
309:
205:
59:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
685:
589:
491:
390:
332:
289:
271:
241:
861:
819:
554:)and one of utter lack of significant coverage (also not completed yet it would appear).--
363:
623:
263:
797:
771:
745:
508:
305:
201:
52:
474:
419:
359:
345:
219:
118:
47:
680:
618:
614:
584:
539:
486:
328:
285:
284:
merge. Thank you for the link though, I was not aware of the licensing problem.
267:
815:
393:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
613:, which is the verifiability side. You're forgetting notability.
304:
he says he hesitates to support merge, sounds like delete to me.
881:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
538:: the three buildings with articles also do not pass the
422:; cities w/ few tall buildings shouldn't have such list—
668:
664:
114:
110:
106:
176:
630:
prior to shooting or recording. Without evidence of
398:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
765:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
266:is not a valid AFD outcome, pick one or another.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
891:). No further edits should be made to this page.
550:(one is under construction, the other is just a
864:of the few sources for a third of the list. --
280:He doesn't actually say that, he says delete
190:
8:
739:list of Romania-related deletion discussions
707:is not a particularly compelling argument --
362:per comments above. Could be closed due to
791:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
785:
759:
733:
789:: This debate has been included in the
763:: This debate has been included in the
737:: This debate has been included in the
609:- You're only looking at one aspect of
81:List of tallest buildings in Timișoara
73:List of tallest buildings in Timișoara
7:
24:
546:as well. There's two counts of
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
874:06:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
855:04:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
824:23:28, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
806:22:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
780:22:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
754:22:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
717:17:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
694:12:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
644:23:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
598:22:35, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
564:17:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
527:17:46, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
500:11:18, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
466:07:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
444:04:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
408:03:51, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
381:22:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
337:11:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
314:11:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
294:11:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
276:08:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
256:07:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
232:06:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
210:05:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
67:06:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
908:
451:into the city's article.
884:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
661:Tender Financial Center
540:notability guidelines
657:Timişoara High Tower
705:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
665:555 Mission Street
536:Additional comment
44:The result was
808:
794:
782:
768:
756:
742:
511:, Sept. 25, 2010.
410:
325:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
899:
886:
853:
850:
844:
838:
795:
769:
743:
690:
688:
683:
678:
594:
592:
587:
582:
496:
494:
489:
484:
464:
462:
457:
449:Delete and merge
442:
439:
433:
427:
397:
395:
374:
369:
264:Delete and merge
253:
248:
195:
194:
180:
132:
122:
104:
56:
34:
907:
906:
902:
901:
900:
898:
897:
896:
895:
889:deletion review
882:
852:
848:
842:
836:
834:
686:
681:
676:
674:
590:
585:
580:
578:
492:
487:
482:
480:
460:
454:
452:
441:
437:
431:
425:
423:
388:
370:
367:
251:
242:
137:
128:
95:
79:
76:
63:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
905:
903:
894:
893:
878:
877:
876:
857:
840:
827:
826:
809:
783:
757:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
697:
696:
669:3344 Peachtree
647:
646:
636:137.122.49.102
601:
600:
567:
566:
556:137.122.49.102
542:and should be
530:
529:
519:137.122.49.102
512:
502:
468:
446:
429:
412:
411:
396:
385:
384:
383:
349:
339:
317:
316:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
234:
198:
197:
134:
130:AfD statistics
75:
70:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
904:
892:
890:
885:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
858:
856:
851:
845:
839:
831:
830:
829:
828:
825:
821:
817:
813:
810:
807:
803:
799:
792:
788:
784:
781:
777:
773:
766:
762:
758:
755:
751:
747:
740:
736:
732:
731:
718:
714:
710:
706:
701:
700:
699:
698:
695:
692:
691:
689:
684:
679:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
651:
650:
649:
648:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
620:
616:
615:verifiability
612:
608:
605:
604:
603:
602:
599:
596:
595:
593:
588:
583:
574:
571:
570:
569:
568:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
534:
533:
532:
531:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
510:
506:
503:
501:
498:
497:
495:
490:
485:
476:
472:
469:
467:
463:
458:
456:
450:
447:
445:
440:
434:
428:
421:
417:
414:
413:
409:
405:
401:
394:
392:
387:
386:
382:
378:
373:
365:
361:
357:
354:and possibly
353:
350:
347:
343:
340:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
318:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
259:
258:
257:
254:
249:
247:
246:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
64:
58:
57:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
883:
880:
811:
786:
760:
734:
673:
672:
652:
631:
606:
577:
576:
572:
551:
543:
535:
514:
504:
479:
478:
470:
461:XANDERLIPTAK
455:
448:
415:
389:
371:
355:
351:
341:
320:
281:
260:
244:
243:
236:
224:76.66.200.95
215:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
60:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
164:free images
833:articles.—
632:notability
619:notability
611:WP:CRYSTAL
548:WP:CRYSTAL
55:Wifione
866:82.7.40.7
862:synthesis
798:• Gene93k
772:• Gene93k
746:• Gene93k
709:82.7.40.7
475:Timişoara
420:Timişoara
400:T. Canens
360:Timișoara
346:Timişoara
220:Timişoara
48:Timişoara
46:merge to
552:proposal
391:Relisted
356:Redirect
245:ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ
125:View log
667:and/or
653:Comment
607:Comment
573:Comment
544:deleted
509:Carrite
505:Comment
372:McClean
364:WP:SNOW
306:LibStar
261:Comment
202:LibStar
170:WP refs
158:scholar
98:protect
93:history
62:.......
837:Chris!
628:albums
515:Delete
426:Chris!
368:Jeremy
329:Yoenit
321:Delete
286:Yoenit
268:riffic
237:Delete
142:Google
102:delete
816:Hobit
624:films
473:into
471:Merge
416:Merge
352:Merge
342:Merge
216:Merge
185:JSTOR
146:books
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
870:talk
820:talk
812:Keep
802:talk
787:Note
776:talk
761:Note
750:talk
735:Note
713:talk
659:and
640:talk
626:and
617:and
560:talk
523:talk
404:talk
377:Talk
333:talk
323:per
310:talk
290:talk
272:talk
252:bomb
228:talk
206:talk
178:FENS
152:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
796:--
770:--
744:--
687:per
682:Pep
677:∙∙∙
671:.)
591:per
586:Pep
581:∙∙∙
493:per
488:Pep
483:∙∙∙
418:to
358:to
344:to
218:to
192:TWL
127:•
123:– (
872:)
822:)
804:)
793:.
778:)
767:.
752:)
741:.
715:)
642:)
562:)
525:)
477:.
406:)
379:)
366:.
335:)
327:.
312:)
292:)
282:or
274:)
230:)
222:.
208:)
172:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
51:.
868:(
849:t
846:/
843:c
818:(
800:(
774:(
748:(
711:(
638:(
558:(
521:(
438:t
435:/
432:c
402:(
375:(
331:(
308:(
288:(
270:(
226:(
204:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
121:)
83:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.