514:
over the entire year. The
Hamburg Masters was played till 2008 when it's order placement was filled by a new "clay court" Madrid Masters. Hamburg was downgraded and is no longer a masters event but it remains in the chart because it was Masters event #5 for many years. The renaming of the 1000 was mainly to enforce that each event is worth 1000 points now. Madrid moved to a new slot in May and as Hamburg was downgraded Shanghai was upgraded and moved to Madrid's old spot. Otherwise it's the same old same old. This chart is really masters events 1-9 no matter where they are located. I love that about it. And you can certainly compare masters events 1-9 with no trouble at all. I really have no idea why you are so confused about this. No one else has a problem. As for the title not including the olympics, I believe that was a later ok'd addition. The title was already long enough and since it was an event that only happened every 4 years it was no big deal.
391:
records from that time period onwards. The ATP didn't run the tour, it was just a union, and there were several competing tours. A member of one tour didn't usually play in events of the other tour. The tours merged and drifted with no one exactly happy about things. In 1990 the ATP took over the Tour and runs it to this day. So from 1990 there are also records and articles. This particular article lists the major events played since 1990: 1) The four Majors, 2)the now called nine "masters" events, 3)the olympics, and (if you earn enough points in those prior events) you earn the right to play in 4)the year end championships. This chart encompasses these events in one easy to see place, to be able to judge how a player has done against his peers and against history. So there's a quick explanation but I hope it helps.
257:- I use this article on a regular basis. It's great to have the most important events in tennis listed right at ones fingertips to make easy comparisons year by year. Plus the two listed in the proposed deletion only list the masters 1000 events and Majors, not the olympics and year-end championships. Here we have the four Majors, the year-end championship, the nine 1000 events, and the Olympics. These are the big events in tennis since 1990 and I believe it's vital that we keep this. I know we ask editors to "be bold" but the nominator has 17 days of edits to his credit...maybe more as an anonymous editor. They could/should have asked about this at Tennis Project after the initial "Proposed Deletion" was instantly vetoed.
471:
regarding how many events there were before and what the new atp 1000 is. This discussion is useless until anyone checks tennis history. I do care a lot which is why I am clearing up that this article is flawed in every way possible. I do not wish to go on a longer discussion if no one is willing to see tennis' history, especially the masters events. The comparison table is what is the worst of this article. You cannot compare players who did not even play the same events and count their titles together.
456:
Whether you call something the Super 9 or, 9 Masters, or
Masters 1000...there were 9 premier 2nd level events plus a championship. What's caused this burr under your saddle? I've done my best to answer you but it's looking more and more like you don't care... that you only want it gone. I can't help you there as I think it's very relevant.
313:. While this article does have some overlap with section in the other two articles that nominator mentions, I do not think it warrants deletion. This list article serves as a kind of "historic timeline" since 1990, and that overview is not provided by the other two articles. "Timeline of" specialized lists are specifically mentioned here
554:. All this information can in principle be found in the different tournament result articles. The distinguishing feature is the overview of results from different seasons and types of tournament, as well as the title count. I agree, however, that expanding the article with pre-1990 results would improve it.
198:. A fairly newly created article which serves no real purpose and is just repeating information. This is a fragment article which has no useful information than the ones already in the two mentioned articles. In fact, it is directly copying the same information in both of them. I nominate this for deletion.
420:
Plus, let me point out, this article is totally misleading with the table where its listing agassi, lendl, sampras etc under masters 1000 series. this series came into existence only after 2009. Plus events like hamburg masters were part of the masters in 90, but they are not in the 1000 series. This
390:
I'll try to help you figure it out. There are wiki tennis articles and records from the entire history of tennis... from way back in 1887. The Open Era began in 1968 and there are articles that have records and such from that time period onwards. The ATP union began in 1972 and there are articles and
366:
If the official ATP tour started in 1990, why are you keeping the Grand slams records, these certainly did not start then. This article is mixing information that should not be here. Please tell me what more does it have than the articles? I do not see any. Also, you cannot compare the atp masters
513:
You are not reading the chart correctly then. First, Yes there were 9 events, I don't know why you'd think otherwise. heck there were 9 events even before then in the Grand Prix
Championship Series. This chart is in Tournament Order for those 9 events so as to show the progress (in masters order)
470:
I am a huge fan of tennis. And I already can see your view and history about tennis. Hamburg is a 500 series now, why does the table include
Hamburg! and NO there were more than 9 premier events then. this list also includes olympics when the title says else. Go back and check your tennis history
455:
They are the same events, with a name change. Do you simply hate tennis or something? We call it the US Open with champions in the 1960s too but it was really the US National
Championships. We often go by the most common name today even though a tournament was named something else in the past.
405:
And the question remains why? ATP 1000 only began in 2009. You cannot compare atp 1000 series and its predecessors. As such, to include sampras and agassi and compare them with recent players is wrong. And sorry, masters events and the recent 1000 series are different with many events not even
159:
87:
82:
91:
74:
206:) 07:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC) I would like to add, this article has titles count from 1990 only when the other two have the whole human tennis history with titles count. So, there is not a single reason to keep this just because some users use it.
351:
It has more than just those two articles and our readers can tell in an instant just how well players did against their peers . And it's from 1990 because the official ATP TOUR started in 1990. The ATP itself started much earlier.
78:
153:
70:
62:
273:
Are you saying? there were no grand slams and big titles before 1990? Sorry not convinced. Tennis is not just mere 20 years. This article serves no purpose if it inludes only 20 years of tennis titles history.
119:
367:
1000 to its predecessors, and the article keeps sampras and agassi, if this article is to be kept, their names have to be removed. Atp masters 1000 started in 2009, it did not exist before then!
333:
Why is it important only after 1990? Why not an article which already exists with all these timeline and titles information? This article has nothing more than already in those two articles.
637:
613:
588:
563:
523:
480:
465:
430:
415:
400:
361:
342:
326:
305:
282:
266:
247:
233:
215:
174:
56:
141:
550:- A useful overview that is not offered elsewhere. Many articles exist with information that is also present in a group of other articles, e.g. lists of medalists such as
135:
576:
114:
131:
597:
621:
551:
181:
293:
147:
190:
The reasons for its deletion are mentioned in the proposal. This article serves no purpose as the records here are already mentioned on
17:
657:
40:
519:
461:
396:
357:
262:
653:
322:
243:
229:
36:
476:
426:
411:
372:
338:
314:
278:
211:
203:
575:
it needs to expand results from 1972 to date or at least as with other arguing points rename it eg:
167:
584:
572:
515:
457:
392:
353:
258:
625:
601:
559:
301:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
652:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
224:. Thanks. But where are we supposed to find the "two mentioned articles" in your "proposal"?
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
318:
239:
225:
472:
422:
407:
368:
334:
274:
207:
199:
195:
294:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tennis/Archive_7#ATP_Grand_slams_.26_Masters_Singles_champions
580:
555:
297:
108:
577:
List of Tennis Tour Grand Slam tournaments and Top Tier event singles champions
53:
71:
List of ATP Tour Grand Slam tournaments and
Masters singles champions
63:
List of ATP Tour Grand Slam tournaments and
Masters singles champions
196:
http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_men's_grand_slam_tennis_champions
646:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
406:
existing from then. So your reasoning is away from the issue.
191:
104:
100:
96:
166:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
660:). No further edits should be made to this page.
180:
8:
620:Note: This debate has been included in the
596:Note: This debate has been included in the
552:List of Olympic medalists in athletics (men)
598:list of Sports-related deletion discussions
622:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
619:
595:
7:
292:-- This was already discussed under
238:OK. I see you have just added them.
192:http://en.wikipedia.org/Atp_masters
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
677:
649:Please do not modify it.
638:08:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
614:08:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
589:07:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
564:11:54, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
524:09:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
481:04:58, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
466:23:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
431:23:39, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
421:article is a total flaw.
416:23:35, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
401:18:55, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
362:03:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
343:19:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
327:08:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
306:08:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
283:19:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
267:08:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
248:07:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
234:07:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
216:19:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
57:03:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
52:. (former-admin close)
375:) 08:12, 21 May 2012
48:The result was
640:
616:
579:just a thought --
571:- but agree with
668:
651:
634:
631:
628:
610:
607:
604:
185:
184:
170:
122:
112:
94:
34:
676:
675:
671:
670:
669:
667:
666:
665:
664:
658:deletion review
647:
632:
629:
626:
608:
605:
602:
127:
118:
85:
69:
66:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
674:
672:
663:
662:
642:
641:
617:
592:
591:
566:
543:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
418:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
346:
345:
330:
329:
308:
286:
285:
270:
269:
252:
251:
250:
188:
187:
124:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
673:
661:
659:
655:
650:
644:
643:
639:
635:
623:
618:
615:
611:
599:
594:
593:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:Fyunck(click)
570:
567:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
546:
545:
544:
525:
521:
517:
516:Fyunck(click)
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
482:
478:
474:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
458:Fyunck(click)
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
432:
428:
424:
419:
417:
413:
409:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
393:Fyunck(click)
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
374:
370:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
354:Fyunck(click)
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
315:WP:STANDALONE
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
287:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:
268:
264:
260:
259:Fyunck(click)
256:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
121:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
648:
645:
568:
547:
542:
310:
289:
254:
221:
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
49:
47:
31:
28:
319:MakeSense64
240:MakeSense64
226:MakeSense64
154:free images
473:DBSSHASPER
423:DBSSHASPER
408:DBSSHASPER
369:DBSSHASPER
335:DBSSHASPER
275:DBSSHASPER
208:DBSSHASPER
200:DBSSHASPER
654:talk page
37:talk page
656:or in a
581:Navops47
115:View log
39:or in a
556:Gap9551
311:Comment
298:Fahidka
222:Comment
160:WP refs
148:scholar
88:protect
83:history
633:JAMMMY
609:JAMMMY
132:Google
92:delete
54:Secret
624:. ★☆
600:. ★☆
175:JSTOR
136:books
120:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
627:DUCK
603:DUCK
585:talk
569:Keep
560:talk
548:Keep
520:talk
477:talk
462:talk
427:talk
412:talk
397:talk
373:talk
358:talk
339:talk
323:talk
302:talk
290:Keep
279:talk
263:talk
255:Keep
244:talk
230:talk
212:talk
204:talk
194:and
168:FENS
142:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
50:keep
636:☆★
612:☆★
182:TWL
117:•
113:– (
630:IS
606:IS
587:)
562:)
522:)
479:)
464:)
429:)
414:)
399:)
360:)
341:)
325:)
317:.
304:)
281:)
265:)
246:)
232:)
214:)
162:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
583:(
558:(
518:(
475:(
460:(
425:(
410:(
395:(
371:(
356:(
337:(
321:(
300:(
296:.
277:(
261:(
242:(
228:(
210:(
202:(
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
123:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.