381:, and it is a policy that we don't have articles which do nothing but give the meaning of a word or expression, no matter how many reliable sources there are. It is not clear to me that simply including several words or expressions in one article, rather than giving each one a separate article, makes any difference to the "not a dictionary" principal. As for "why pick on Thai idioms rather than English ones", I didn't "pick on" anything: I happened to see this article, and didn't happen to see the one on English idioms, that's all. AS for being able to evaluate the article more easily, I don't see that what language is involved makes any difference to how easy it is to decide whether or not the policy that Knowledge is not a dictionary applies to an article containing nothing but a list of expressions and definitions of them.
377:"Considering coverage in reliable sources" is "the normal way" of deciding whether an article should be deleted for failing to satisfy the notability guidelines, but that is not the issue here, so reliable sources are irrelevant. Whether a topic has substantial coverage in reliable sources is only one of the issues which decides whether we have an article on the topic.
358:
Then what basis do you have for your bold assertion that it is doubtful whether a list of expressions in a language has a place here, if it's not to be decided in the normal way, by considering coverage in reliable sources? And if you do have a basis for it then why pick on Thai idioms rather than
322:" for deletion? Then there would be a better chance for editors of English Knowledge to judge whether this type of content attracts significant coverage in independent reliable sources, because potential sources would mostly be in English.
165:
562:
Every time I come back to this AfD, I find myself caught up reading this list and I consider that to be a pretty good (subjective) indicator of encyclopedic value. We do have several other lists of idioms (e.g.,
359:
English ones? It would be much easier to make such a general case by considering an article that readers of
English Knowledge will be able to evaluate more easily, whatever form that evaluation might take.
288:. A description of Thai idioms, including summaries of widely accepted scholarly treatments, would probably make a useful encyclopedia entry. In its current state, however, this article is an
159:
318:
If lists of idioms in general are not to be considered to have a place here, as suggested by the nominator, then wouldn't a better way to test the waters to be to nominate "
118:
91:
86:
261:
213:
95:
78:
125:
568:
237:
575:) that are within the scope of the nominator's rationale, so we should rightly attach them to this discussion for a group decision. I'd lean towards
424:. And if you think that is the best outcome here (or for any other AfD) you can certainly argue for it (but be aware that Wiktionary has its own
579:
them since lists of idioms can at very least play an important role in navigating otherwise disparate social articles across our project (i.e.,
340:
That is missing the point, because the reasons I gave for deletion have nothing to do with the existence or non-existence of reliable sources.
407:
180:
147:
196:
Knowledge is not a dictionary or a language manual, and it is doubtful whether a list of expressions in a language has a place here.
82:
564:
319:
17:
612:
557:
529:
499:
478:
460:
437:
425:
415:
390:
368:
349:
331:
313:
277:
253:
229:
205:
141:
60:
137:
304:
argument, although I do think the topic (under the name "Thai language idioms" rather than "List of...") is worthwhile.
74:
66:
187:
631:
40:
554:
289:
411:
490:
This list is interesting to read and certainly helpful in understanding Thai popular language and culture.
265:
241:
217:
474:
386:
364:
345:
327:
201:
153:
627:
595:), but if they absolutely must go, then it is important that their content be transwikied and not lost.
522:
36:
551:
421:
173:
592:
470:
456:
382:
378:
360:
341:
323:
197:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
626:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
509:
495:
433:
309:
293:
580:
547:
448:
572:
297:
452:
54:
112:
588:
584:
491:
429:
305:
512:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
469:"Synthesis of a single source" is an obviously self-contradictory statement.
602:
451:
of a single source. It needs to be transwikied, incubated, or improved.
542:
to
Wiktionary, if they don't have anything like this already, or just
620:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
406:
Shouldn't there be an option for transwiki-ing to
Wiktionary? --
292:
of idioms and translations. That seems to run afoul of
108:
104:
100:
172:
519:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
634:). No further edits should be made to this page.
262:list of Thailand-related deletion discussions
214:list of Language-related deletion discussions
186:
8:
569:List of 19th-century English language idioms
260:Note: This debate has been included in the
236:Note: This debate has been included in the
212:Note: This debate has been included in the
259:
238:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
235:
211:
7:
24:
447:, as currently written; this is
565:List of English language idioms
320:List of English language idioms
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
369:15:03, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
350:14:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
332:21:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
314:01:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
278:18:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
254:18:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
230:18:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
206:12:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
548:Knowledge is not a dictionary
379:Knowledge is not a dictionary
613:07:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
300:. I guess this adds up to a
75:List of Thai language idioms
67:List of Thai language idioms
61:17:59, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
558:16:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
530:10:04, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
500:18:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
479:19:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
461:19:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
438:14:20, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
416:17:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
391:07:42, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
651:
623:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
426:criteria for inclusion
296:and the criteria for
290:indiscriminate list
48:The result was
532:
298:stand-alone lists
280:
256:
232:
642:
625:
611:
609:
525:
524:Mr. Stradivarius
518:
514:
274:
271:
268:
250:
247:
244:
226:
223:
220:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
57:
34:
650:
649:
645:
644:
643:
641:
640:
639:
638:
632:deletion review
621:
603:
596:
523:
507:
272:
269:
266:
248:
245:
242:
224:
221:
218:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
648:
646:
637:
636:
616:
615:
581:Achilles' heel
560:
552:Metropolitan90
535:
534:
533:
516:
515:
504:
503:
502:
484:
483:
482:
481:
464:
463:
442:
441:
440:
420:There is; see
408:101.108.239.72
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
372:
371:
353:
352:
335:
334:
316:
282:
281:
257:
233:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
647:
635:
633:
629:
624:
618:
617:
614:
610:
608:
607:
601:
600:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
561:
559:
556:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
531:
528:
527:
526:
517:
513:
511:
506:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
485:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:
466:
465:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
418:
417:
413:
409:
405:
402:
401:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:
374:
373:
370:
366:
362:
357:
356:
355:
354:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
284:
283:
279:
275:
263:
258:
255:
251:
239:
234:
231:
227:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
622:
619:
605:
604:
598:
597:
576:
543:
539:
521:
520:
508:
487:
471:Phil Bridger
444:
422:WP:ATD-TRANS
403:
383:JamesBWatson
361:Phil Bridger
342:JamesBWatson
324:Phil Bridger
301:
285:
273:PEANUTBUTTER
249:PEANUTBUTTER
225:PEANUTBUTTER
198:JamesBWatson
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
53:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
589:break a leg
585:black sheep
302:weak delete
160:free images
593:sacred cow
628:talk page
540:transwiki
449:synthesis
294:WP:NOTDIC
37:talk page
630:or in a
510:Relisted
119:View log
39:or in a
606:C M B J
577:keeping
538:Either
453:Bearian
404:Comment
286:Comment
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
56:MBisanz
555:(talk)
544:delete
492:Hmains
445:Delete
430:Cnilep
306:Cnilep
138:Google
96:delete
264:. ★☆
240:. ★☆
216:. ★☆
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
550:. --
496:talk
488:keep
475:talk
457:talk
434:talk
412:talk
387:talk
365:talk
346:talk
328:talk
310:talk
267:DUCK
243:DUCK
219:DUCK
202:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
573:etc
428:).
276:☆★
252:☆★
228:☆★
188:TWL
117:– (
599:—
591:,
587:,
583:,
571:,
567:,
546:.
498:)
477:)
459:)
436:)
414:)
389:)
367:)
348:)
330:)
312:)
270:IS
246:IS
222:IS
204:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
52:.
494:(
473:(
455:(
432:(
410:(
385:(
363:(
344:(
326:(
308:(
200:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.