79:
74:
180:
106:
101:
110:
237:. Simply put, to be considered significant coverage in reliable sources, it really needs coverage outside of just Pitchfork Media. If the Pitchfork list is being mentioned elsewhere, then the list concept is notable; if not, no.
93:
174:
140:
233:
applies here. This isn't notable outside of the publication. The existence of other articles with similar issues of third-party coverage (as brought up in the first AfD) is irrelevant per
369:
353:
335:
311:
286:
264:
58:
295:
133:
252:
is clear about academic sources being reliable and scholarly only when they have been peer-reviewed, and that student paper for some economics class has not been vetted.
240:
The past discussion resulted in no consensus; two editors voted delete per the above reasons, one editor voted to keep this article because they were not familiar with
195:
162:
319:
156:
152:
97:
216:
202:
89:
64:
248:
from Brown
University as a response. Another editor then erroneously claimed it was an academic source and Knowledge accepts such sources.
168:
17:
212:
388:
245:
40:
350:
346:. The article doesn't establish that being awarded "Best New Music" by Pitchfork is a notable distinction. --
384:
255:
Nothing in the way of reliable third-party coverage has been added to this article since the first AfD.
249:
36:
274:
244:, and another who voted to keep the article was the main contributor to the article who only offered
241:
234:
230:
56:
347:
188:
278:
256:
80:
Articles for deletion/List of albums awarded Best New Music by
Pitchfork Media (2nd nomination)
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
383:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
282:
260:
53:
328:
304:
221:
363:
225:
appear to be it, and this article is made up of nothing else but 549 citations to
127:
75:
Articles for deletion/List of albums awarded Best New Music by
Pitchfork Media
323:
299:
377:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
90:
List of albums awarded Best New Music by
Pitchfork Media
65:
List of albums awarded Best New Music by
Pitchfork Media
123:
119:
115:
187:
296:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
391:). No further edits should be made to this page.
277:and lack of significant third-party coverage.
229:reviews). While Pitchfork itself is notable,
201:
8:
318:Note: This debate has been included in the
294:Note: This debate has been included in the
361:per nom and my comments in the first AfD.
320:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
317:
293:
72:
7:
211:There is no signficant coverage by
71:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
370:07:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
354:05:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
336:04:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
312:04:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
287:04:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
265:03:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
246:this student research paper
408:
59:00:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
380:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
273:as the nominator, per
70:AfDs for this article:
217:these few paragraphs
213:third-party sources
338:
332:
314:
308:
399:
382:
366:
333:
330:
326:
309:
306:
302:
206:
205:
191:
143:
131:
113:
34:
407:
406:
402:
401:
400:
398:
397:
396:
395:
389:deletion review
378:
364:
329:
324:
305:
300:
227:Pitchfork Media
215:of this topic (
148:
139:
104:
88:
85:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
405:
403:
394:
393:
373:
372:
356:
348:Metropolitan90
340:
339:
315:
290:
289:
250:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
222:The L Magazine
209:
208:
145:
84:
83:
82:
77:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
404:
392:
390:
386:
381:
375:
374:
371:
368:
367:
360:
357:
355:
352:
349:
345:
342:
341:
337:
334:
327:
321:
316:
313:
310:
303:
297:
292:
291:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:WP:NOTINHERIT
272:
269:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
253:
251:
247:
243:
242:WP:NOTINHERIT
238:
236:
235:WP:OTHERSTUFF
232:
231:WP:NOTINHERIT
228:
224:
223:
218:
214:
204:
200:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
154:
151:
150:Find sources:
146:
142:
138:
135:
129:
125:
121:
117:
112:
108:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
81:
78:
76:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
379:
376:
362:
358:
343:
270:
254:
239:
226:
220:
210:
198:
192:
184:
177:
171:
165:
159:
149:
136:
49:
47:
31:
28:
175:free images
54:joe decker
385:talk page
37:talk page
387:or in a
134:View log
39:or in a
365:Lugnuts
181:WP refs
169:scholar
107:protect
102:history
359:Delete
351:(talk)
344:Delete
271:Delete
153:Google
111:delete
50:delete
325:/wiae
301:/wiae
279:Dan56
257:Dan56
196:JSTOR
157:books
141:Stats
128:views
120:watch
116:links
16:<
331:/tlk
307:/tlk
283:talk
261:talk
189:FENS
163:news
124:logs
98:talk
94:edit
219:by
203:TWL
132:– (
52:.
322:.
298:.
285:)
263:)
183:)
126:|
122:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
281:(
259:(
207:)
199:·
193:·
185:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
155:(
147:(
144:)
137:·
130:)
92:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.