366:: It is a subjective list lacking NPOV, soapboxing, and contains errors. You have chosen to focus on particular artists. "Whole Lotta Love" for example is not a cover as you claim on the list. While part of the lyrics may have been borrowed from "You Need Love", it is not a cover. Your list fails to mention this. Similar with other songs. If you have an axe to grind against certain white artists, a list on an encyclopaedia is not acceptable.
509:
Yes there is an overlap, which is why the blues-rock list can easily be accomodated into the list of blues standards without any difficulty. Regardless if it's played electric or acoustic, it's still blues music. The chord structures are the same. No need to create content forks.
193:
Trivial list. A never ending subjective collection of covers. Many of these songs have been covered by hundreds of artists. No rationale for notability for each entry or why that particular cover artist was chosen. Information is already covered in the existing song articles
487:: This list and the list of blues standards have two different sets of criteria for inclusion. One focuses on blues-rock or rock performers, while the other focuses on blues performers. Inevitably, there is some overlap, as in
162:
329:
No rationale for entry? - As stated, the criteria is a blues song, i.e., a song originally written, performed, or recorded by a blues artist. The links to the songs identify them as authored or recorded by blues
387:
Focus? - Since the list concerns blues-rock, blues-rock or rock performers are the focus. The links identify the performers as blues-rock or rock performers. Again, anyone can add to the list and have.
341:
Covered in existing articles? - Maybe, but spread out over forty plus articles. The purpose of a list is to gather the information in one place. It aids in "information, navigation, and development" (
335:
Particular artist chosen? - Again, as stated, the artists included are those blues-rock or rock performers that have covered the song. The links to those performers identify them as blues-rock or rock
156:
382:
Subjective, NPOV, etc.? - Again the criteria for inclusion on the list are clearly stated. They are neither too narrow or broad. Anyone can add to the list, which indeed they have.
324:
Covered by hundreds of artists? - An overstatement. Many of these songs have been covered by other artists, who do not meet the criteria (are not blues-rock or rock performers).
117:
90:
85:
94:
77:
441:: "Whole Lotta Love" is not a cover. The credits clearly indicate this. If it was a cover it would state Dixon alone. That is not the case. It is not a cover.
122:
240:
214:
468:, which has plenty of room for more entries. In fact that list already includes a number of blues-rock songs including "Travelling Riverside Blues".
411:
Straight cover? - The list does not claim to include only "straight covers". A cover may be a song "with a radically different style". (Knowledge
177:
144:
519:
504:
477:
450:
432:
404:
375:
357:
255:
229:
203:
138:
59:
17:
134:
488:
307:
81:
311:
184:
73:
65:
534:
36:
533:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
515:
473:
492:
465:
150:
446:
420:
Axe to grind? - This is a patently ridiculous and offensive statement. Is that what this is really about?
400:
371:
199:
511:
469:
442:
396:
367:
195:
170:
342:
500:
428:
353:
284:
251:
225:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
464:, listcruft. The format and content can easily be accommodated in the pre-existing article
461:
297:
268:
55:
412:
496:
424:
349:
247:
221:
111:
303:
415:). The links to the songs or performers provide the additional information.
50:
495:. However, the simple fact is blues-rock and blues are not the same.
319:
Subjective? - Criteria for inclusion have been stated (see following).
527:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
266:
Trivial list? - Blues-rock is a recognized music genre (
107:
103:
99:
169:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
537:). No further edits should be made to this page.
183:
8:
241:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
235:
215:list of Music-related deletion discussions
209:
239:: This debate has been included in the
213:: This debate has been included in the
293:
282:
395:: Over 90% being anonymous IP edits.
7:
413:Cover version#Modern cover versions
292:Cite has empty unknown parameter:
24:
302:). Knowledge has articles about
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
74:List of blues-rock cover songs
66:List of blues-rock cover songs
1:
489:List of blues-rock performers
308:List of blues-rock performers
520:23:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
505:02:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
478:22:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
451:20:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
433:04:12, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
405:20:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
376:21:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
358:04:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
312:List of blues-rock musicians
256:15:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
230:15:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
204:09:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
60:00:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
554:
530:Please do not modify it.
306:and blues-rock artists (
32:Please do not modify it.
493:List of blues musicians
466:List of blues standards
269:"Genre: Blues-rock"
262:Against deletion:
44:The result was
258:
244:
232:
218:
545:
532:
301:
295:
290:
288:
280:
278:
276:
245:
219:
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
34:
553:
552:
548:
547:
546:
544:
543:
542:
541:
535:deletion review
528:
291:
281:
274:
272:
267:
130:
121:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
551:
549:
540:
539:
524:
523:
522:
481:
480:
460:- Unnecessary
454:
453:
422:
421:
417:
416:
408:
407:
389:
388:
384:
383:
379:
378:
347:
346:
338:
337:
332:
331:
326:
325:
321:
320:
316:
315:
260:
259:
233:
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
550:
538:
536:
531:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:Wurzburgwatch
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
482:
479:
475:
471:
470:Wurzburgwatch
467:
463:
459:
456:
455:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
419:
418:
414:
410:
409:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
390:
386:
385:
381:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
344:
340:
339:
334:
333:
328:
327:
323:
322:
318:
317:
313:
309:
305:
299:
286:
270:
265:
264:
263:
257:
253:
249:
242:
238:
234:
231:
227:
223:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
529:
526:
484:
457:
443:PaulHammond2
438:
423:
397:PaulHammond2
392:
368:PaulHammond2
363:
348:
273:. Retrieved
261:
236:
210:
196:PaulHammond2
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
343:WP:LISTPURP
336:performers.
294:|coauthors=
275:January 16,
157:free images
304:blues-rock
271:. allmusic
248:• Gene93k
222:• Gene93k
462:WP:CFORK
330:artists.
285:cite web
118:View log
497:Ojorojo
485:Comment
439:Comment
425:Ojorojo
393:Comment
364:Comment
350:Ojorojo
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
458:Delete
135:Google
95:delete
46:delete
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
516:talk
501:talk
491:and
474:talk
447:talk
429:talk
401:talk
372:talk
354:talk
310:and
298:help
277:2010
252:talk
237:Note
226:talk
211:Note
200:talk
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
246:--
220:--
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
518:)
503:)
476:)
449:)
431:)
403:)
374:)
356:)
345:).
314:).
289::
287:}}
283:{{
254:)
243:.
228:)
217:.
202:)
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
48:.
514:(
499:(
472:(
445:(
427:(
399:(
370:(
352:(
300:)
296:(
279:.
250:(
224:(
198:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.