Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/List of buffet restaurants - Knowledge

Source 📝

441:
indiscriminate list of all buffet restaurants in the world, nor is it a list of loosely associated topics or a yellow pages type page that has contact information such as phone numbers, fax numbers and e-mail addresses. This article has none of this. As such, WP:NOTDIRECTORY is being misapplied toward this article.
440:
provide context information, specifically in its lead section. Some entries on the list also have descriptions, and more can easily be added. Also, contrary to WP:NOTDIRECTORY, this is a discriminate, refined list that only includes topics that have their own articles on Knowledge. It is not an
538:
KFC is on here because apparently "some locations include a buffet". There are lots of restaurants that maybe a few locations have a buffet, and lots of other issues in buffet service. This can be covered by articles, there is no benefit to having a
211: 424:. This is demonstrated in part per the page views that the article receives compared to the category page: The list article has received an average of 160 page views per day between 1/1/2020 and 6/30/2020 ( 563:
That one entry on a list is improper is an argument for removing or editing that entry, not for deleting the list, any more than bad grammer in one sentence is an argument for deleting an article.
339:
of NOTDIR, which clearly states just that. They are also not understanding what "without context" means because "buffet restaurant" is plainly defined both by the intro and the linked article
519:- WP:NOTDIRECTORY doesn’t imply deletion this way - lists are written differently then that. The reasoning is that there are enough notable examples to make the list meet the GNG exception. 205: 164: 137: 132: 141: 271: 124: 111: 96: 171: 560:
I have noted this in the past too but it's an argument for clearly defining what is a buffet restaurant and cleaning up the list, not deleting it.
226: 243: 193: 492:– It meets the one GNG exception as applied to lists (restricts inclusion to notable items), and adheres to criteria outlined within 247: 128: 91: 84: 17: 569: 335:. We list and categorize articles by what their subjects are. It's just as simple as that, and commenters above need to read 187: 599: 574: 548: 530: 511: 484: 467: 447: 404: 373: 356: 311: 283: 263: 66: 381:
Anything in the category can be listed here with additional information shown, making it far more useful than a category.
183: 417: 324: 105: 101: 120: 72: 233: 616: 544: 40: 428:), whereas during the same time period, the category page has only received an average of 4 page views per day ( 525: 455:
as per NA1k. These types of list articles, populated by notable examples, are part of how we organize data.
480: 279: 259: 475:
As others have said, these lists are very useful and well-used. The key is to keep them free of redlinks.
462: 295: 251: 62: 612: 443: 369: 199: 36: 436:
compared to the category, and furthermore, contrary to the nomination for deletion, this list article
540: 520: 219: 567: 476: 421: 332: 320: 304: 275: 255: 595: 456: 433: 351: 80: 58: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
611:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
413: 382: 365: 493: 587: 54: 564: 498: 328: 299: 591: 345: 158: 420:
and also functions as a valuable information source and navigational aid, as per
429: 425: 343:, so we know what this list and its corresponding category should include. 586:- I was ready to 86 it, but on reading it fully, it look like it passes 340: 412:– This list of notable restaurants qualifies for an article per 607:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
590:. It's limited in scope, has all blue links, and verifiable. 254:, item #7, as a simple listing without context information. 154: 150: 146: 218: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 619:). No further edits should be made to this page. 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 232: 8: 112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 272:list of Lists-related deletion discussions 269: 432:). The list clearly has more utility for 7: 250:, the article should be deleted per 24: 97:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 364:this could be quite useful. 418:Category:Buffet restaurants 325:Category:Buffet restaurants 87:(AfD)? Read these primers! 636: 248:failed RM on the talk page 121:List of buffet restaurants 73:List of buffet restaurants 600:00:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 319:as index of articles per 67:23:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 609:Please do not modify it. 575:17:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 549:16:58, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 531:16:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 512:16:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 485:16:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 468:13:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 448:19:46, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 405:19:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 374:18:48, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 357:17:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 312:17:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 284:17:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 264:17:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 323:and as complement to 85:Articles for deletion 331:. There are notable 55:(non-admin closure) 333:buffet restaurants 571:DESiegel Contribs 541:John Pack Lambert 507: 503: 286: 102:Guide to deletion 92:How to contribute 57: 627: 528: 523: 508: 505: 501: 446: 401: 398: 395: 392: 389: 386: 309: 302: 237: 236: 222: 174: 162: 144: 82: 53: 34: 635: 634: 630: 629: 628: 626: 625: 624: 623: 617:deletion review 572: 526: 521: 499: 442: 399: 396: 393: 390: 387: 384: 305: 300: 296:WP:NOTDIRECTORY 252:WP:NOTDIRECTORY 179: 170: 135: 119: 116: 79: 76: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 633: 631: 622: 621: 603: 602: 580: 579: 578: 577: 570: 561: 552: 551: 533: 522:Eternal Shadow 514: 487: 470: 450: 407: 376: 359: 314: 288: 287: 240: 239: 176: 115: 114: 109: 99: 94: 77: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 632: 620: 618: 614: 610: 605: 604: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 582: 581: 576: 573: 568: 566: 562: 559: 556: 555: 554: 553: 550: 546: 542: 537: 534: 532: 529: 524: 518: 515: 513: 510: 509: 495: 491: 488: 486: 482: 478: 477:Lard Almighty 474: 471: 469: 466: 465: 460: 459: 454: 451: 449: 445: 444:North America 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 408: 406: 403: 402: 380: 377: 375: 371: 367: 363: 360: 358: 354: 353: 348: 347: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 315: 313: 310: 308: 303: 297: 293: 290: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276:GeoffreyT2000 273: 268: 267: 266: 265: 261: 257: 256:GeoffreyT2000 253: 249: 245: 244:62.165.227.49 235: 231: 228: 225: 221: 217: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 185: 182: 181:Find sources: 177: 173: 169: 166: 160: 156: 152: 148: 143: 139: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 117: 113: 110: 107: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 89: 88: 86: 81: 74: 71: 69: 68: 64: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 608: 606: 583: 557: 535: 516: 497: 489: 472: 463: 458:Dennis Brown 457: 452: 437: 416:relative to 409: 383: 378: 361: 350: 344: 336: 316: 306: 291: 246:said in the 241: 229: 223: 215: 208: 202: 196: 190: 180: 167: 78: 59:Mdaniels5757 49: 47: 31: 28: 422:WP:LISTPURP 366:Devokewater 321:WP:LISTPURP 206:free images 434:WP:READERS 613:talk page 414:WP:NOTDUP 37:talk page 615:or in a 494:WP:LISTN 301:Schazjmd 165:View log 106:glossary 39:or in a 592:Bearian 588:WP:LIST 558:Comment 346:postdlf 212:WP refs 200:scholar 138:protect 133:history 83:New to 536:Delete 341:buffet 329:WP:CLN 307:(talk) 292:Delete 184:Google 142:delete 539:list. 400:Focus 227:JSTOR 188:books 172:Stats 159:views 151:watch 147:links 16:< 596:talk 584:Keep 545:talk 527:Talk 517:Keep 490:Keep 481:talk 473:Keep 453:Keep 438:does 430:link 426:link 410:Keep 379:KEEP 370:talk 362:Keep 352:talk 327:per 317:Keep 294:per 280:talk 260:talk 220:FENS 194:news 155:logs 129:talk 125:edit 63:talk 50:keep 565:DES 506:TAR 502:ILD 337:all 242:As 234:TWL 163:– ( 598:) 547:) 496:— 483:) 464:2¢ 461:- 372:) 355:) 298:. 282:) 274:. 262:) 214:) 157:| 153:| 149:| 145:| 140:| 136:| 131:| 127:| 65:) 52:. 594:( 543:( 504:S 500:W 479:( 397:m 394:a 391:e 388:r 385:D 368:( 349:( 278:( 258:( 238:) 230:· 224:· 216:· 209:· 203:· 197:· 191:· 186:( 178:( 175:) 168:· 161:) 123:( 108:) 104:( 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Mdaniels5757
talk
23:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
List of buffet restaurants

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
List of buffet restaurants
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.