Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/List of chemistry mnemonics - Knowledge

Source 📝

584:
entry needs a source that shows the item is in wide use, otherwise wikipedia will be spreading the use of a mnemonic that someone has just invented. If they do appear widely in standard textbooks, as the previous comment suggests, then they should be used as sources. If I have to make a decision, I come down on the side of saying that this article should not be on wikipedia. The other articles in the category seem to match our criteria better than this massive list. --
583:
I am unsure about this one. I have been a chemistry educator for over 50 years and I have never heard of any of them, but perhaps they are used in secondary schools. However, I was a university chemistry academic with a keen interest in chemical education. If this article is to be kept, then every
208:
Specifically, there are no particular criteria for a mnemonic's inclusion in this list. Of course, this is a problem common to many lists (such as those of slang and industry-specific terms). However, in this case, I think that there is no way of establishing a given mnemonic's notability or lack
565:. It does serve an encyclopedic purpose: it is a collection of chemical mnemonics, which should clearly be valuable knowledge in the field of chemistry. A list needs to be well-defined, and I see nothing ill-defined about what a 170: 216:
Furthermore, there do not appear to be any third-party sources available that distinguish between commonly used mnemonics and those that have been suggested in pages referenced by this article but are otherwise unused.
484:" A mnemonic is clearly a teaching aid, so in my mind, not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Also, the mnemonics that aren't referenced, smack of original research (and not very good at that). 164: 123: 234: 296: 96: 91: 265: 100: 283: 252: 316: 83: 130: 185: 152: 482:
Knowledge is an encyclopedic reference, not a textbook. The purpose of Knowledge is to present facts, not to teach subject matter.
87: 202: 17: 374: 146: 599: 578: 557: 540: 517: 493: 470: 444: 417: 390: 353: 328: 308: 288: 257: 226: 65: 361:- our core readership of students will almost certainly search for this and expect that we have it. It is also probably 142: 349: 324: 304: 79: 71: 466: 399: 222: 192: 370: 618: 440: 432: 413: 40: 500:
With a few easy clicks, I cut out a bunch of totally unsourced lines. "How easy was that?" - chemist and cook
345: 320: 300: 158: 614: 553: 536: 489: 462: 218: 36: 436: 409: 548:
per Smartyllama. And an article like this needs a lot of attention because of homemade mnemonics...
201:
I don't believe this article serves any encyclopaedic purpose. Therefore, I feel that it fits under
574: 178: 531:
These are well known and have value. Chemistry mnemonics are widely covered in reliable sources.
341: 337: 513: 386: 60: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
613:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
549: 532: 485: 366: 592: 528: 450: 428: 570: 505: 362: 457:
mnemonics over mnemonics as a whole. There are already more than enough examples at
509: 382: 54: 117: 378: 585: 501: 377:
just last night, and I'm not ashamed to admit that I'd use this article in a
566: 458: 213:
is notable in and of itself, but adequately covered in its own article.
210: 340:, but we have a LOT of these things, including a science subcat, at 607:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
569:
is. These mnemonics also appear widely in standard textbooks. —
453:. I don't believe any of the sources establish notability for 402:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
504:. Ordinary editing can fix the problems identified, so 113: 109: 105: 177: 408:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 449:I disagree (as nominator) that the topic passes 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 621:). No further edits should be made to this page. 235:list of Education-related deletion discussions 297:list of Language-related deletion discussions 191: 8: 315:Note: This debate has been included in the 295:Note: This debate has been included in the 266:list of Science-related deletion discussions 264:Note: This debate has been included in the 233:Note: This debate has been included in the 317:list of Lists-related deletion discussions 314: 294: 263: 232: 506:total chemical explosion is unwarranted 336:I know it seems odd and a violation of 373:. I had an interview to be a science 209:thereof. Of course, the concept of a 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 600:19:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC) 579:12:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC) 558:09:34, 22 January 2017 (UTC) 541:02:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC) 518:13:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC) 494:05:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 471:20:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 445:13:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC) 418:07:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC) 391:16:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC) 354:21:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC) 329:16:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC) 309:16:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC) 289:05:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 258:05:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 227:05:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 66:19:52, 25 January 2017 (UTC) 80:List of chemistry mnemonics 72:List of chemistry mnemonics 638: 367:secondary school textbooks 610:Please do not modify it. 431:while the nomination is 203:WP:What Knowledge is not 32:Please do not modify it. 371:cover such mnemonics 433:WP:NOTENCYCLOPEDIC 342:Category:Mnemonics 427:The topic passes 420: 346:Shawn in Montreal 331: 321:Shawn in Montreal 311: 301:Shawn in Montreal 291: 287: 284:(Follow my trail) 260: 256: 253:(Follow my trail) 629: 612: 597: 590: 463:Triptothecottage 407: 405: 403: 281: 279: 273: 250: 248: 242: 219:Triptothecottage 196: 195: 181: 133: 121: 103: 34: 637: 636: 632: 631: 630: 628: 627: 626: 625: 619:deletion review 608: 593: 586: 421: 410:Spirit of Eagle 398: 396: 375:teaching fellow 286: 277: 269: 255: 246: 238: 138: 129: 94: 78: 75: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 635: 633: 624: 623: 603: 602: 581: 560: 543: 521: 520: 497: 496: 475: 474: 473: 406: 395: 394: 393: 356: 333: 332: 312: 292: 282: 261: 251: 199: 198: 135: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 634: 622: 620: 616: 611: 605: 604: 601: 598: 596: 591: 589: 582: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 561: 559: 555: 551: 547: 544: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 523: 522: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 495: 491: 487: 483: 480:Per WP:NOT: " 479: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 447: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 423: 422: 419: 415: 411: 404: 401: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 357: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 313: 310: 306: 302: 298: 293: 290: 285: 280: 272: 267: 262: 259: 254: 249: 241: 236: 231: 230: 229: 228: 224: 220: 214: 212: 206: 204: 194: 190: 187: 184: 180: 176: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 144: 141: 140:Find sources: 136: 132: 128: 125: 119: 115: 111: 107: 102: 98: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 76: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 62: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 609: 606: 595:(Discussion) 594: 587: 562: 545: 524: 481: 477: 454: 424: 397: 358: 275: 270: 244: 239: 215: 207: 200: 188: 182: 174: 167: 161: 155: 149: 139: 126: 59: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 550:Christian75 533:Smartyllama 486:Glendoremus 379:lesson plan 338:WP:NOTHOWTO 165:free images 527:Satisfies 502:Ina Garten 615:talk page 571:Lowellian 455:chemistry 437:Andrew D. 278:Horrorist 247:Horrorist 37:talk page 617:or in a 567:mnemonic 529:WP:LISTN 459:mnemonic 451:WP:LISTN 429:WP:LISTN 400:Relisted 365:because 211:mnemonic 124:View log 39:or in a 510:Bearian 383:Bearian 369:always 363:notable 171:WP refs 159:scholar 97:protect 92:history 55:postdlf 478:Delete 274:, the 243:, the 143:Google 101:delete 588:Bduke 575:reply 186:JSTOR 147:books 131:Stats 118:views 110:watch 106:links 16:< 563:Keep 554:talk 546:Keep 537:talk 525:Keep 514:talk 490:talk 467:talk 441:talk 425:Keep 414:talk 387:talk 359:Keep 350:talk 325:talk 305:talk 276:Mad 271:Zeke 245:Mad 240:Zeke 223:talk 179:FENS 153:news 114:logs 88:talk 84:edit 61:talk 50:keep 205:. 193:TWL 122:– ( 52:. 577:) 556:) 539:) 516:) 508:. 492:) 469:) 461:. 443:) 435:. 416:) 389:) 381:. 352:) 344:. 327:) 319:. 307:) 299:. 268:. 237:. 225:) 173:) 116:| 112:| 108:| 104:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 64:) 573:( 552:( 535:( 512:( 488:( 465:( 439:( 412:( 385:( 348:( 323:( 303:( 221:( 197:) 189:· 183:· 175:· 168:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 145:( 137:( 134:) 127:· 120:) 82:( 58:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
postdlf
talk
19:52, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
List of chemistry mnemonics
List of chemistry mnemonics
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:What Knowledge is not
mnemonic

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.