222:, and the HUGE amount of sourcing for why they are all there. Look at the talk page(/archives) too, as there's a lot of discussion about how to get such, etc. Most of these lists being put for deletion probably could have sources to back things up, and the case of THIS page I'd say it's worthwhile to keep, as an offshoot from the main
157:
pretty much establishes the a precedent that a list being unfinished (or unfinishable) and possibly subjective isn't a sufficient reason for deletion. A list like this can be acknowledged as perpetually incomplete and somewhat subjective and still be a worthwhile resource. That all said (again),
226:
page. But it really REALLY needs some care put into it because, like the others, it seems so small and worthless at the moment. (BTW: This logic can be made to most of these 'list of' , things being nominated, but they would not only need tons of sourcing, but a rename to including some word like
90:
85:
217:
There's a large difference between a factual list, which time signatures clearly fall in, and an opinionated one. If you're going to make the later, you need some basis of WHY they are on the list -- look at
94:
77:
260:
Needs sources but the subject is notable. There are whole books written on defining the standard compositions that make up the jazz repertoire (I have placed a small list on the article's
128:. No sources are given and the list appears to be an arbitrary list of a few well known jazz tunes. Also what exactly is that title supposed to be? According to what composer?
285:. "According to composer" just means the songs are listed under the composer's name instead of chronologically, alphabetically, etc... Also I would move the page up to the
261:
117:
81:
73:
65:
154:
316:
272:
250:
231:
209:
191:
145:
132:
312:
294:
17:
125:
290:
177:
308:
332:
36:
331:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
219:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
286:
206:
282:
304:
202:
300:
165:
142:
129:
270:
201:
This information belongs on the respective artists pages and few others. this should not be here
169:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
173:
54:
265:
223:
188:
293:
so as to delete an unnecessary category. Ideally I'd like to move everything up to
247:
228:
111:
241:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
48:
155:
AfD discussion of List of musical works in unusual time signatures
187:. Did that AfD establish a precedent, or just make a mistake? --
325:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
246:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
335:). No further edits should be made to this page.
74:List of jazz standards (according to composer)
66:List of jazz standards (according to composer)
162:on this vote. 09:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
8:
297:but let's go only one step at a time.
7:
289:and delete the subcategory of that
24:
291:Category:Lists of pieces by style
295:Category:Lists of musical works
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
46:keep, no consensus to delete.
317:20:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
273:17:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
251:16:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
232:11:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
210:10:19, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
192:10:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
146:06:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
133:06:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
352:
328:Please do not modify it.
287:Category:Lists of pieces
220:List of important operas
32:Please do not modify it.
153:It's worth noting that
283:List of jazz standards
141:as per nomination. --
229:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫
319:
303:comment added by
253:
181:
168:comment added by
126:original research
343:
330:
305:Dafoeberezin3494
298:
268:
245:
243:
163:
115:
97:
59:
57:Roll, Tide, Roll
34:
351:
350:
346:
345:
344:
342:
341:
340:
339:
333:deletion review
326:
266:
239:
88:
72:
69:
61:
55:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
349:
347:
338:
337:
321:
320:
281:but rename to
255:
254:
244:
236:
235:
234:
227:'important').
212:
196:
195:
194:
158:I'm remaining
148:
122:
121:
68:
63:
53:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
348:
336:
334:
329:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
271:
269:
263:
259:
252:
249:
242:
238:
237:
233:
230:
225:
224:Jazz standard
221:
216:
213:
211:
208:
204:
200:
197:
193:
190:
186:
183:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
161:
156:
152:
149:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
60:
58:
52:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
327:
324:
278:
257:
256:
240:
214:
198:
184:
159:
150:
138:
123:
56:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
299:—Preceding
164:—Preceding
207:Talk to me
262:talk page
143:S.dedalus
130:S.dedalus
313:contribs
301:unsigned
267:dissolve
189:Mikeblas
185:Question
178:contribs
166:unsigned
151:Comment:
124:Obvious
118:View log
248:Spartaz
215:Comment
160:neutral
91:protect
86:history
203:Carter
199:Delete
139:Delete
95:delete
170:Torc2
112:views
104:watch
100:links
50:JodyB
16:<
309:talk
279:Keep
258:Keep
174:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
264:).
116:– (
315:)
311:•
205:|
180:)
176:•
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
307:(
172:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.