214:", but after looking at the article I realized that would mean deleting the entire article. An article based on the section "Songs where the primary topic is homosexuality" would be worth keeping if it was sourced properly, but the only way to get there is to start over. The entire section "Songs where there is a strong indication the topic is homosexuality or can be interpreted as such" needs to be deleted even if this AfD doesn't end with a delete.
144:
original research. It's a haven for anonymous IP edits from people who probably do not understand how
Knowledge works, as they keep adding their own uncited, originally researched personal ideas of songs that fit into this category, and as such is misleading. Jimbo Wales would not stand for a list
147:
I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all
125:
140:. It's full of original research, much of it is subjective and littered with personal views. On top of that, it's listcruft, and the subsection "Songs where there is a strong indication the topic is homosexuality or can be interpreted as such"
150:"). If anyone can find any reliable sources for a reasonably sized list, I'd be quite happy to have this list stay, even if it probably does constitute listcruft. As such, it's a travesty and a textbook example of what Knowledge is
128:. The arguments by the deletion nominator for the first nomination were extremely weak, as I pointed out in the second AFD, which was much more valid. I carried out the second AFD nomination myself and the list was saved (as
132:) on a whim at the end by two 'keep' voters who have failed to do anything to improve the article since, and whose arguments were poor ("do we need citations to prove genre in television in 99% of instances?" =
407:
Definitely not. These things happen. I don't think anyone will mind if you delete your remark and everything that's followed as a result of it, however...including this. (I know I won't object...) Cheers,
121:
291:— in fact, no sources at all. Conceivably, a decent article could be written here, but this isn't it. Kill it and let someone else start over in accordance with policy if they want to try.
325:- keeping an article on the basis of "it can be sourced" necessitates that it eventually be sourced. This hasn't, so I tend to believe such arguments are fallacious in this case. --
86:
81:
337:
I have nothing against LGBT people (the last girl I slept with was bisexual and I met her ex-girlfriend and she was nice), but I am pleased with the way that this AFD is going.-
90:
73:
113:
181:
442:
422:
399:
375:
353:
329:
317:
303:
275:
254:
242:
218:
202:
190:
170:
55:
17:
227:
77:
69:
61:
293:
390:
344:
161:
133:
457:
36:
456:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
231:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
235:
395:
349:
166:
385:
339:
156:
412:
365:
265:
136:), claiming that this songs about homosexuality list could be referenced, but still there is not a
420:
373:
273:
52:
215:
187:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
439:
314:
199:
198:- I heard somewhere that articles like this are unverifiable and should be deleted. -
417:
409:
370:
362:
284:
270:
262:
251:
151:
288:
211:
383:
I shouldn't use
Knowledge when I'm drunk and get back from a night out, should I?-
107:
239:
326:
361:
I'm sure she'd be thrilled to hear that you're spreading the word...
450:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
313:: Don't people have blogs for this kind of thing? Unbelievable.
103:
99:
95:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
230:and doesn't satisfy any of the purposes under the
460:). No further edits should be made to this page.
210:I was going to say "weak keep, just remove the
138:single reference or citation in the whole list
238:, not useful for navigation or development).
234:(not a "valuable information source" if it's
8:
180:: This debate has been included in the
250:. It's unreferenced. Kill, With fire.
7:
24:
70:List of songs about homosexuality
62:List of songs about homosexuality
182:list of Lists-related deletions
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
477:
453:Please do not modify it.
260:Destroy with tuning fork
32:Please do not modify it.
443:11:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
423:09:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
400:09:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
376:02:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
354:00:59, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
330:21:10, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
318:01:22, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
304:00:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
276:22:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
255:17:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
243:17:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
219:17:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
203:17:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
191:17:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
171:16:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
56:11:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
438:save it for gag sites
226:- as it stands it is
134:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
285:original research
228:original research
185:
468:
455:
415:
368:
302:
300:
297:*** Crotalus ***
289:reliable sources
268:
176:
111:
93:
48:
34:
476:
475:
471:
470:
469:
467:
466:
465:
464:
458:deletion review
451:
413:
396:r e s e a r c h
366:
350:r e s e a r c h
294:
292:
283:. This is pure
266:
232:list guidelines
167:r e s e a r c h
84:
68:
65:
46:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
474:
472:
463:
462:
446:
445:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
320:
307:
306:
298:
278:
257:
245:
221:
205:
193:
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
473:
461:
459:
454:
448:
447:
444:
441:
437:
434:
424:
421:
419:
416:
411:
406:
403:
402:
401:
398:
397:
393:
392:
388:
387:
382:
379:
378:
377:
374:
372:
369:
364:
360:
357:
356:
355:
352:
351:
347:
346:
342:
341:
336:
333:
332:
331:
328:
324:
321:
319:
316:
312:
309:
308:
305:
301:
299:
296:
290:
286:
282:
279:
277:
274:
272:
269:
264:
261:
258:
256:
253:
249:
246:
244:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
220:
217:
213:
209:
206:
204:
201:
197:
194:
192:
189:
183:
179:
175:
174:
173:
172:
169:
168:
164:
163:
159:
158:
153:
149:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
53:Mailer Diablo
50:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
452:
449:
435:
404:
394:
389:
384:
380:
358:
348:
343:
338:
334:
322:
310:
295:
280:
259:
247:
223:
216:Pax:Vobiscum
207:
195:
188:Pax:Vobiscum
177:
165:
160:
155:
146:
145:like this ("
141:
137:
130:no consensus
129:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
148:information
142:can only be
440:Bulldog123
236:unverified
391:s p a c e
345:s p a c e
315:WikiFishy
162:s p a c e
287:with no
252:Moreschi
114:View log
405:Comment
381:Comment
359:Comment
335:Comment
87:protect
82:history
436:Delete
323:Delete
311:Delete
281:Delete
248:Delete
240:QmunkE
224:Delete
208:Delete
196:Delete
91:delete
386:h i s
340:h i s
327:Haemo
157:h i s
108:views
100:watch
96:links
49:elete
16:<
178:Note
126:AFD2
124:and
122:AFD1
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
51:. -
410:Tom
363:Tom
263:Tom
186:--
184:.
152:not
112:– (
212:OR
200:eo
154:.-
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
418:r
414:e
371:r
367:e
271:r
267:e
120:(
116:)
110:)
72:(
47:d
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.