321:
rather facile way to approach the question of when it is and isn't appropriate (from WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS: "Another contributor may respond simply by saying that just because other stuff exists does not mean that the article in question should be kept. While perhaps a legitimate response, the automatic dismissal of such a statement is just as lacking in rationale and thus the second user has provided no reason to delete the article."). General practice regarding the same kind of content is a relevant though not absolute consideration, particularly where the deletion nom is in some way applicable to all of that content ("merely a collection of tracks recorded by the band").
342:
However poor an article/list this is, there is room for improvement, For any artist with a number of albums issued, nominations for awards and awards for songs, a list article provides useful adjunct to the discography and main article page. If the nominator feels there is a problem with Lists of
320:
Asking for "notability of this list" is off-base as the subject is not a list; the list is merely a presentation format. So that's not a coherent way of analyzing this list. There do seem to be a lot of lists of other notable artists' songs; dismissing that as a mere OTHERSTUFF observation is a
300:
You don't even have a legitimate reason to delete the article, so... You can't nominate two song list articles without nominating all of them, as per your logic, they should all be deleted; there's nothing different about them. They are all list of songs.
164:
217:. I'd hope that this article is a list of the group's singles and album tracks; that's what this sort of list is for. If you'd like to get rid of a couple, please nominate them all, if not, then don't bother.
92:
87:
96:
158:
79:
119:
124:
83:
75:
67:
360:
No actual policy cited by the nom. This list contains notable entries, meeting the stand-alone list requirements. It needs improvement, yes, but not deletion.
256:
234:
179:
146:
368:
352:
334:
309:
291:
270:
248:
225:
203:
61:
140:
136:
276:
214:
186:
17:
152:
195:
I'm not seeing any indication of notability of this list. It is merely a collection of tracks recorded by the band.
280:
387:
40:
343:
songs, then a discussion at the relevant projects, or a group AfD nomination may well be more appropriate. --
383:
57:
36:
348:
172:
329:
266:
244:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
382:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53:
344:
302:
218:
362:
323:
283:
are not policies or guidelines and thus not valid reasons for keeping the article.
262:
240:
113:
284:
196:
376:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
171:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
390:). No further edits should be made to this page.
277:Category:Lists of songs by authors or performers
215:Category:Lists of songs by authors or performers
185:
76:List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance
68:List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance
8:
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
257:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
254:
235:list of Music-related deletion discussions
232:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
369:08:37, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
353:09:25, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
335:18:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
310:21:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
292:14:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
271:14:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
249:14:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
226:13:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
204:11:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
62:11:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
407:
379:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
281:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
48:The result was
273:
260:
251:
238:
398:
381:
365:
307:
261:
239:
223:
190:
189:
175:
127:
117:
99:
34:
406:
405:
401:
400:
399:
397:
396:
395:
394:
388:deletion review
377:
363:
303:
219:
132:
123:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
404:
402:
393:
392:
372:
371:
355:
337:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
295:
294:
252:
229:
228:
193:
192:
129:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
403:
391:
389:
385:
380:
374:
373:
370:
367:
366:
359:
356:
354:
350:
346:
341:
338:
336:
332:
331:
326:
325:
319:
318:
311:
308:
306:
299:
298:
297:
296:
293:
290:
289:
288:
282:
278:
275:
274:
272:
268:
264:
258:
253:
250:
246:
242:
236:
231:
230:
227:
224:
222:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
201:
200:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
378:
375:
361:
357:
339:
328:
322:
304:
286:
285:
220:
210:
198:
197:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
159:free images
54:Mark Arsten
345:Richhoncho
384:talk page
263:• Gene93k
241:• Gene93k
37:talk page
386:or in a
120:View log
39:or in a
364:Lugnuts
324:postdlf
209:Smh...
165:WP refs
153:scholar
93:protect
88:history
137:Google
97:delete
340:Keep.
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
358:Keep
349:talk
330:talk
287:Till
279:and
267:talk
245:talk
213:per
211:Keep
199:Till
173:FENS
147:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
305:Zac
221:Zac
187:TWL
122:•
118:– (
351:)
333:)
269:)
259:.
247:)
237:.
167:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
347:(
327:(
265:(
243:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.