327:
Saying that "no specific civil or criminal conduct is indictaed" makes the event described by the article unnotable is absurd. An event's notability is not described by its legality; should be delete the article on slavery in the US because is was legal? Also saying all this exists just to "promote a
236:
The information about a prominent public office-holder, the EU president and former
Luxembourg PM, is in the public domain and is certainly notable. As a responsible office-holder, and former office-holder, he is in a position to answer publicly, and can decide whether or not, and how and when, to do
369:
the page exists merely to mirror a blog listing unfounded and defamatory allegations with no documentation given. This is born out by Admin (!) Thue's restoring a list of businesses which are alleged to have "shady" dealings according to the source. If the article is to be kept, it has to be about
198:
This page seems to be designed to promote a single website based on shaming businesses for normal business practices where no specific civil or criminal conduct is indictaed. Synthetic defamatory implications were made by providing a list of companies and the name of a non-notable private individual
59:
as keep, hugely notable news event in Europe. The AfD nomination describes the scandal, but doesn't indicate why the topic wouldn't be article-worthy or why the whole page needed deletion instead of editing. Please don't nominate articles for AfD without a good reason to delete them.
347:
I see every indication that this article is notable. Google it as it's been said. Perhaps there's reason to suggest that a list of companies isn't included if the allegations are unproven as suggested by the proposer, but then that's not n AFD
370:
the business's and official reaction to the leaks, not promoting a POV and implying criminality where none has even been alleged. As to notability, there was just a major scandal about celebrity nude photos being hacked. Would an article
411:
As a matter of fact the claim “This page seems to be designed to promote a single website” is false. I added information on the collaborative approach by leading media organizations from around the world to the article. --
167:
374:
these celebrities as a whole be appropriate. The article needs oversight at the very least, with no company being mentioned unless it is subject to charges or it comments itself on the allegations.
434:. I consider this here a tactical move to keep it off the main page for as long as possible (until it's off the news). But take your time if necessary: It will be on the news for a long time. --
237:
so. The list which had been removed from the article is not required there, but can be found elsewhere by anyone interested. To suppress the information altogther would itself be a POV-ish act.
120:
161:
199:
against whom no charges have been leveled, as well as naming the former PM of
Luxembourg (now EU president) as having "been in office" during the time described.
127:
93:
88:
97:
80:
460:
431:
182:
17:
149:
456:
281:
143:
483:
395:
353:
40:
464:
443:
421:
399:
383:
357:
337:
317:
294:
268:
246:
226:
217:- currently an ITN suggestion with support. Also the websites purpose doesnt change the articles notability.--
208:
69:
139:
255:
But if kept the name may need changing by reference to the information, not to a purportedly "proper name".
256:
84:
479:
407:
189:
36:
391:
349:
435:
413:
264:
242:
175:
439:
417:
313:
155:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
478:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
328:
single website" represents a to me incomprehensible lack of judgement and failure to google.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
379:
292:
222:
204:
76:
49:
455:. i think news coverage has made the lemma highly important. and, of course, viceVersa.
333:
260:
238:
65:
309:
305:
114:
375:
285:
218:
200:
390:
Struck duplicate vote. μηδείς as the nominator you have already cast a vote.
329:
61:
472:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
284:
This is such a big deal the G20 is about to deal with it.
110:
106:
102:
174:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
486:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:This topic is widely covered on many serious (
188:
8:
432:Knowledge:In_the_news/Candidates#November_13
257:Talk:Luxembourg Leaks#Name and attribution
7:
24:
430:FYI: I nominated the article for
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
465:08:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
444:08:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
422:08:11, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
400:05:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
384:03:28, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
358:00:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
338:00:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
318:23:51, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
295:23:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
269:02:07, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
247:23:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
227:22:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
209:22:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
70:08:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
503:
475:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
55:The result was
392:-Serialjoepsycho-
350:-Serialjoepsycho-
494:
477:
290:
193:
192:
178:
130:
118:
100:
77:Luxembourg Leaks
50:Luxembourg Leaks
34:
502:
501:
497:
496:
495:
493:
492:
491:
490:
484:deletion review
473:
286:
135:
126:
91:
75:
53:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
500:
498:
489:
488:
468:
467:
449:
448:
447:
446:
425:
424:
403:
402:
387:
386:
361:
360:
341:
340:
321:
320:
308:) news sites.
298:
297:
274:
273:
272:
271:
250:
249:
230:
229:
196:
195:
132:
52:
47:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
499:
487:
485:
481:
476:
470:
469:
466:
462:
458:
454:
451:
450:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
423:
419:
415:
410:
409:
405:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
368:
367:
363:
362:
359:
355:
351:
346:
343:
342:
339:
335:
331:
326:
323:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
299:
296:
293:
291:
289:
283:
282:Go google it.
279:
276:
275:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
251:
248:
244:
240:
235:
232:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:Find sources:
133:
129:
125:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
72:
71:
67:
63:
58:
51:
48:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
474:
471:
452:
406:
371:
365:
364:
344:
324:
301:
287:
277:
233:
214:
197:
185:
179:
171:
164:
158:
152:
146:
136:
123:
56:
54:
31:
28:
408:Speedy Keep
278:Speedy Keep
215:Speedy Keep
162:free images
457:Maximilian
57:Snow close
480:talk page
261:Qexigator
239:Qexigator
37:talk page
482:or in a
436:Neudabei
414:Neudabei
121:View log
39:or in a
372:listing
310:Edwardx
168:WP refs
156:scholar
94:protect
89:history
376:μηδείς
366:Delete
348:issue.
288:JTdale
219:BabbaQ
201:μηδείς
140:Google
98:delete
306:WP:RS
183:JSTOR
144:books
128:Stats
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
461:talk
453:keep
440:talk
418:talk
396:talk
380:talk
354:talk
345:Keep
334:talk
330:Thue
325:Keep
314:talk
302:Keep
265:talk
243:talk
234:Keep
223:talk
205:talk
176:FENS
150:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
66:talk
62:Fram
190:TWL
119:– (
463:)
442:)
420:)
398:)
382:)
356:)
336:)
316:)
267:)
259:--
245:)
225:)
207:)
170:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
68:)
459:(
438:(
416:(
394:(
378:(
352:(
332:(
312:(
280:-
263:(
241:(
221:(
203:(
194:)
186:·
180:·
172:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
142:(
134:(
131:)
124:·
117:)
79:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.