Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Matt Riccardi - Knowledge

Source 📝

456:
to running for governor — such as lieutenant governor, or attorney general, or a seat in the state legislature or the US Congress, or mayor of one of the state's biggest cities — rather than from the fact of running for governor per se. But there's no preexisting notability for other reasons being
422:
even major party candidates for governor are not 100% passes of GNG, although there is probably enough indepth coverage for most to pass. Minor party candidates for governor are orders of magnitude below passing GNG considering how little impact minor parties have in US politics. This is from an
370:
Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the
174: 473:
the gubernatorial candidates rather than sources which single him out for dedicated attention. So there are really only two sources here that count toward establishing notability at all — and that's not enough.
423:
editor who voted for the Constitution Party candidate for US president in 2016, so I have no animus against the party, I just recognize that Riccardi does not meet notability criteria.
246: 127: 226: 266: 168: 444:
isn't an automatic notability boost either, especially if one is a minor-party candidate. Even for Democratic or Republican candidates for governor, the notability
375:
That It does not gurantee notability does not auto-translate to he/she not being notable as line 8 above implies and explains. That aside, even on the grounds of
465:
campaign website, one is a raw table of the prior election results from 2013, three are unnecessary repetitions of two of the others, and two are basic and
461:
coverage that's substantively about him to grant him a special exception: of the 13 footnotes here, five are unnecessary reduplications of his own
600: 577: 53: 134: 555:
Not sure about that. Thousands of people stand in elections worldwide every year. We would become flooded with campaign advertisements.
523: 100: 95: 65: 104: 17: 87: 189: 156: 274: 254: 234: 56:. Consensus is against this staying its own article, but the redirection is uncontested and apparently has precedent. 440:. Unelected candidates for office are not guaranteed articles just for being candidates — and being a candidate for 343:
as an unelected candidate for office with no other notability. No in-depth coverage outside routine election news.
635: 612: 604: 428: 40: 585: 462: 150: 320:
actually says that "Just being...an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability"
496: 401:
as an unelected minor party candidate who has predicted that he will lose. The coverage is run of the mill.
61: 616: 591: 564: 560: 546: 529: 517: 500: 483: 432: 414: 384: 352: 348: 329: 325: 302: 298: 289:
Generally as long as it is not a local election, but that of governship of a major state i believe as per
278: 270: 258: 250: 238: 230: 218: 146: 69: 631: 214: 36: 608: 537:- Consensus about unelected candidates is clear, although Knowledge is ultimately the poorer for it. 424: 398: 196: 581: 407: 182: 492: 91: 57: 209:
to me: he is just a candidate for office. Other claims to nottability look insufficient to me.
556: 542: 513: 479: 466: 380: 361: 344: 321: 311: 294: 206: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
630:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
210: 162: 603:, a notability deletion is not policy based, and the issue is a content decision.  As per 376: 509: 402: 365: 340: 317: 290: 83: 75: 538: 475: 458: 121: 599:
Notability is the only issue raised, and since the topic is prominent at
624:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
580:, as is often done with failed candidates like this. - 117: 113: 109: 181: 247:list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 638:). No further edits should be made to this page. 227:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions 267:list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions 195: 8: 508:a personal bio of a person who doesn't meet 379:i feel this page merits a stand alone. 265:Note: This debate has been included in the 245:Note: This debate has been included in the 225:Note: This debate has been included in the 293:he definetely qualifies for a stand alone. 264: 244: 224: 512:and got all of 0.3% in the NJ-Gov race. 607:, content issues don't belong at AfD. 601:New Jersey gubernatorial election, 2017 578:New Jersey gubernatorial election, 2017 54:New Jersey gubernatorial election, 2017 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 457:demonstrated here, nor enough 387:) 1:16, 05 November 2017 (UTC) 1: 617:16:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 592:00:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 565:23:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 547:18:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 530:02:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 70:19:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 501:15:56, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 484:20:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC) 452:held another notable office 433:04:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC) 415:02:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC) 353:23:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 330:23:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 316:In that case you are wrong. 303:21:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 279:15:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 259:15:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 239:15:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 219:13:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 655: 627:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 491:per Cullen32's point 368:we understand that; " 448:derives from having 605:WP:Deletion policy 425:John Pack Lambert 281: 271:Shawn in Montreal 261: 251:Shawn in Montreal 241: 231:Shawn in Montreal 646: 629: 588: 526: 520: 412: 410:Let's discuss it 315: 200: 199: 185: 137: 125: 107: 34: 654: 653: 649: 648: 647: 645: 644: 643: 642: 636:deletion review 625: 609:Unscintillating 590: 586: 524: 518: 459:reliable source 408: 309: 142: 133: 98: 82: 79: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 652: 650: 641: 640: 620: 619: 594: 584: 582:The Bushranger 570: 569: 568: 567: 550: 549: 532: 503: 486: 463:primary source 435: 417: 391: 390: 389: 388: 373: 356: 355: 333: 332: 306: 305: 283: 282: 262: 242: 203: 202: 139: 78: 73: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 651: 639: 637: 633: 628: 622: 621: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 595: 593: 589: 587:One ping only 583: 579: 575: 572: 571: 566: 562: 558: 554: 553: 552: 551: 548: 544: 540: 536: 533: 531: 527: 521: 515: 511: 507: 504: 502: 498: 494: 493:cOrneLlrOckEy 490: 487: 485: 481: 477: 472: 469:overviews of 468: 464: 460: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 436: 434: 430: 426: 421: 420:Strong delete 418: 416: 413: 411: 406: 405: 400: 399:WP:POLITICIAN 396: 393: 392: 386: 382: 378: 374: 372: 367: 363: 360: 359: 358: 357: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 335: 334: 331: 327: 323: 319: 313: 308: 307: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 285: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 263: 260: 256: 252: 248: 243: 240: 236: 232: 228: 223: 222: 221: 220: 216: 212: 208: 198: 194: 191: 188: 184: 180: 176: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 144:Find sources: 140: 136: 132: 129: 123: 119: 115: 111: 106: 102: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84:Matt Riccardi 81: 80: 77: 76:Matt Riccardi 74: 72: 71: 67: 66:contributions 63: 59: 58:Jo-Jo Eumerus 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 626: 623: 596: 573: 557:AusLondonder 534: 514:power~enwiki 505: 488: 470: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 419: 409: 403: 394: 381:Celestina007 369: 362:AusLondonder 345:AusLondonder 336: 322:AusLondonder 312:Celestina007 295:Celestina007 286: 204: 192: 186: 178: 171: 165: 159: 153: 143: 130: 49: 47: 31: 28: 597:Wrong venue 211:TheLongTone 205:Looks like 169:free images 467:WP:ROUTINE 207:WP:TOOSOON 632:talk page 364:, As per 37:talk page 634:or in a 574:Redirect 442:governor 377:WP:BASIC 371:article" 128:View log 50:redirect 39:or in a 539:Carrite 510:WP:NPOL 476:Bearcat 450:already 446:usually 366:WP:NPOL 341:WP:NPOL 318:WP:NPOL 291:WP:NPOL 175:WP refs 163:scholar 101:protect 96:history 535:Delete 506:Delete 489:Delete 438:Delete 404:Cullen 397:Fails 395:Delete 339:Fails 337:Delete 147:Google 105:delete 454:prior 190:JSTOR 151:books 135:Stats 122:views 114:watch 110:links 16:< 613:talk 561:talk 543:talk 497:talk 480:talk 429:talk 385:talk 349:talk 326:talk 299:talk 287:Keep 275:talk 255:talk 235:talk 215:talk 183:FENS 157:news 118:logs 92:talk 88:edit 62:talk 576:to 471:all 197:TWL 126:– ( 52:to 615:) 563:) 545:) 528:) 522:, 499:) 482:) 431:) 351:) 328:) 301:) 277:) 269:. 257:) 249:. 237:) 229:. 217:) 177:) 120:| 116:| 112:| 108:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 68:) 64:, 611:( 559:( 541:( 525:ν 519:π 516:( 495:( 478:( 427:( 383:( 347:( 324:( 314:: 310:@ 297:( 273:( 253:( 233:( 213:( 201:) 193:· 187:· 179:· 172:· 166:· 160:· 154:· 149:( 141:( 138:) 131:· 124:) 86:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
New Jersey gubernatorial election, 2017
Jo-Jo Eumerus
talk
contributions
19:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Matt Riccardi
Matt Riccardi
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.