Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Maudine Ormsby - Knowledge

Source 📝

151:
OSU probably doesn't have a page dedicated to homecomings (and it shouldn't!) but you can create a subsection on the main page. Another option is to put it somewhere if there is a general page on OSU sports since, in my experience, homecomings are associated with (usually) football games. Postcard
135:
Interesting fact. Reasonably sourced (newspaper article from OSU paper) for a stub. Legitimate bit of notability--at least locally. I can see adding it into an appropriate OSU page but I can't think of an example (Does OSU have a page dedicated to homecomings?). Thus, a stand alone article makes the
209:
No, it would be trivial because it would have to be placed in a trivia section to be placed on a seperate page. If not, where would you place it? There is no section on homecoming. As for being trivial on its own page, it is not. There are sources that deal directly with the topic, in a non-trivial
119:
My prod, which I did in part because I thought this might be a hoax, was deleted because the person says it isn't a hoax. Well, fine. I still think it is not wiki worthy for a stand alone article. The fact that no OSU page links to it, IMHO, is testimony to that. Either incorporate into an
168:
I don't think that is the best option. Having this on the main OSU page is absurd, and would be at best a trivial inclusion. As for the OSU football/athletics pages, the link is tangential at best. It would be different if there was an OSU homecoming page. It seems to me, the subject meets
202:
There is something very illogical about your comment. If it is too trivial to put on the main OSU page, then why is not trivial when it comes to having it's own page? You can't be trivial in one aspect and not trivial in another, at least in this respect. Postcard Cathy
210:
manner. In fact, if you really wanted to do some research, I am sure you can go back and see several articles on the topic at the time it occured--which was well before the news was put on the web. These issues all point to it meeting
243: 262:
Google searches show some notability, which is astounding for a cow from 1926. How many non-trivial references are there in articles not available online? Also, notability does not mean
112: 321: 85: 80: 89: 72: 17: 400: 36: 399:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
377: 354: 331: 311: 284: 272: 254: 222: 181: 140: 124: 54: 300: 121: 76: 49: 342: 251: 281: 267: 52: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
374: 365:) The cow is irrelevant as it is just a vehicle to the legal issue at hand. Postcard Cathy 219: 178: 137: 68: 60: 247: 351: 106: 218:
which equates to this AFD nom being improper. I really don't see the issue here.
328: 215: 211: 174: 170: 373:
I think he was making a joke. There is no need to take this all so seriously.
340:
to respond to Nick mallory: WP already has an interesting cow at
393:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
242:
not enthusiastic about the animal, notoriety seems trivial, but
120:
appropriate OSU page and then delete or merge out right as nn.
266:
notability, or popularity with people living in 2007. --
102: 98: 94: 280:
The more interesting cows Knowledge has the better.
173:
at least locally (which is all that is needed), and
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 403:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 320:: This debate has been included in the 7: 350:back into the university's article? 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 322:list of Ohio-related deletions 1: 420: 378:17:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 355:22:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 332:08:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 312:06:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 291:You cow fetishest you! :) 285:23:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 273:21:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 255:21:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 223:16:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 182:13:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 141:20:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 125:19:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 55:19:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 396:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 343:Sherwood v. Walker 244:three Google Books 334: 325: 411: 398: 326: 316: 309: 306: 303: 270: 246:have results. -- 110: 92: 34: 419: 418: 414: 413: 412: 410: 409: 408: 407: 401:deletion review 394: 329:John Vandenberg 307: 304: 301: 268: 83: 67: 64: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 417: 415: 406: 405: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 358: 357: 335: 314: 293: 292: 288: 287: 275: 257: 236: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 226: 225: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 186: 185: 184: 156: 155: 154: 153: 146: 145: 144: 143: 122:Postcard Cathy 117: 116: 69:Maudine Ormsby 63: 61:Maudine Ormsby 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 416: 404: 402: 397: 391: 390: 379: 376: 372: 369: 368: 367: 366: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 356: 353: 349: 345: 344: 339: 336: 333: 330: 323: 319: 315: 313: 310: 299:not notable-- 298: 295: 294: 290: 289: 286: 283: 279: 276: 274: 271: 265: 261: 258: 256: 253: 249: 245: 241: 238: 237: 224: 221: 217: 213: 208: 205: 204: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 193: 192: 183: 180: 176: 172: 167: 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 159: 158: 157: 150: 149: 148: 147: 142: 139: 134: 131: 130: 129: 128: 127: 126: 123: 114: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 395: 392: 370: 347: 341: 337: 317: 296: 282:Nick mallory 277: 263: 259: 239: 206: 165: 136:most sense. 132: 118: 45: 43: 31: 28: 375:CraigMonroe 220:CraigMonroe 179:CraigMonroe 138:CraigMonroe 260:Weak Keep 133:Weak Keep 346:. Maybe 269:Charlene 248:Dhartung 113:View log 371:Comment 352:Bearian 338:Comment 240:Comment 207:Comment 166:Comment 86:protect 81:history 50:Jaranda 297:Delete 264:online 90:delete 348:merge 152:Cathy 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 318:Note 278:Keep 252:Talk 216:WP:V 214:and 212:WP:N 175:WP:V 171:WP:N 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 46:keep 327:-- 324:. 308:gle 305:rin 302:Sef 111:– ( 250:| 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 48:. 177:. 115:) 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Jaranda

19:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Maudine Ormsby
Maudine Ormsby
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Postcard Cathy
19:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
CraigMonroe
20:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
WP:N
WP:V
CraigMonroe
13:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
WP:N
WP:V
CraigMonroe
16:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
three Google Books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.