521:, and in that she shares space with her husband/spouse as the article's subject. And as that is the only one where she gets close to significant coverage, are we to say that any time a major alma mater (say any major accredited university (from Oxford on down to California State University, Stanislaus)) of a subject does a biography on the subject does that make the subject automatically notable?
409:
548:
We have significant coverage of her works, and some level of coverage of her personal life. That should be enough. Ignoring the coverage of her works and demanding even more coverage of her personal life is the wrong direction, because that leads to an encyclopedia where we only cover celebrities and
349:
without any help from her sister. She was the youngest dean of a law school in the United States and as director of ACLU's largest affiliate, she was a highly visible public figure in
California. Her advocacy for police reform and authorship of papers on community policing as well as her current work
436:
it looks like we will have to agree to disagree. In the first three links she is part of the articles, but not the primary subject; so I can understand the argument, but do not agree with the assessment. On this point I will have to agree to disagree. That being said, as a Dean the subject does not
419:
417:
397:
I disagree with your assessment here, RightCowLeftCoast. If you haven't revisited the article since your original !vote, sources have been added that now establish notability. I don't think an argument for WP:AUTHOR can be reasonably made, but the subject easily meets
474:
instead. I found a lot of news stories quoting her briefly or otherwise mentioning her trivially, but I also found one with a couple paragraphs of nontrivial detail about her (in the context of her promotion to associate director of ACLU) in the
411:. WP:NOTINHERITED is not a factor here because Maya is independently notable. Harris was one of the youngest law school deans in US history and has been a spokesperson and public policy advocate in her positions at ACLU
165:
244:
218:, however notability is not inherited. Looking throught he sources, the subject has been mentioned multiple times in print and news publications, however non would be consired
118:
383:, but from what I can find, she doesn't appear to be "widely cited". She is briefly mentioned by many widely cited scholarly works, but her own works are not widely cited.--
524:
I've been involved in AfDs that received a keep due to the subject having an obit in the New York Times, as well as there has been AfDs even with the New York Times obit.
292:
159:
517:
of the subject There are several quotes and brief mentions, but none that are in-depth by any stretch of the term. The closest to significant coverage is the
350:
with the Ford
Foundation cement her notability. While sources have been added to the article that demonstrate significant coverage, many more can be found.
407:
268:
125:
375:; the organizations she has worked for/with maybe notable in and of themselves but that does not mean that subject herself is notable, see
534:
Has a major publication does a lengthy biography where the subject is the primary subject of the article? So far, I have not seen one.--
91:
86:
17:
492:
429:
358:
95:
403:
180:
147:
78:
539:
446:
415:
388:
231:
579:
40:
554:
500:
412:
414:
and the Ford
Foundation. Her comments on public policy issues are regularly picked up by national newspapers
141:
296:
272:
248:
535:
442:
384:
376:
227:
575:
137:
36:
558:
543:
504:
450:
431:
392:
360:
333:
308:
284:
260:
235:
205:
60:
488:
484:
550:
496:
187:
173:
438:
427:
356:
514:
470:(neither having two publications nor being law dean is enough) so I think we have to look for
370:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
574:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
491:. I also found one article mentioning her only briefly, but as the winner of a local award:
380:
319:
201:
82:
399:
330:
153:
467:
528:
471:
422:
351:
346:
223:
215:
54:
112:
480:
197:
74:
66:
476:
322:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
214:; the subject of this BLP is related to a notable individual, California AG
479:, and three going into nontrivial detail about her writings in the
568:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
196:
Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't confirm notability
549:
not people who are actually known for what they have done. —
245:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
108:
104:
100:
172:
495:. So the case is weak, but above threshold for me. —
329:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
582:). No further edits should be made to this page.
379:. It could be argued that she is notable due to
406:is in-depth as is the coverage in these links:
293:list of California-related deletion discussions
369:However, the subject herself has not received
186:
8:
291:Note: This debate has been included in the
267:Note: This debate has been included in the
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
531:requires significant coverage. Where is it?
290:
266:
242:
269:list of Law-related deletion discussions
421:, demonstrating a breadth of coverage.
7:
24:
513:Do those few paragraphs warrant
345:. Subject is notable and passes
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
559:18:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
544:11:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
505:23:16, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
451:14:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
432:21:30, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
393:02:41, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
361:19:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
334:02:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
309:15:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
285:15:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
261:15:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
236:18:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
206:12:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
61:03:02, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
466:. She clearly doesn't pass
599:
571:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
437:warrant notability per
481:New Pittsburgh Courier
515:significant coverage
372:significant coverage
220:significant coverage
485:Cincinatti Enquirer
402:. Coverage in the
48:The result was
536:RightCowLeftCoast
443:RightCowLeftCoast
385:RightCowLeftCoast
336:
311:
287:
263:
228:RightCowLeftCoast
590:
573:
425:
354:
328:
324:
305:
302:
299:
281:
278:
275:
257:
254:
251:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
57:
34:
598:
597:
593:
592:
591:
589:
588:
587:
586:
580:deletion review
569:
519:Stanford Lawyer
477:Oakland Tribune
423:
404:Stanford Lawyer
377:WP:NOTINHERITED
352:
317:
303:
300:
297:
279:
276:
273:
255:
252:
249:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
596:
594:
585:
584:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
551:David Eppstein
532:
525:
522:
508:
507:
497:David Eppstein
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
364:
363:
339:
338:
337:
326:
325:
314:
313:
312:
288:
264:
239:
238:
222:as defined by
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
595:
583:
581:
577:
572:
566:
560:
556:
552:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
526:
523:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
509:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
473:
469:
465:
462:
461:
452:
448:
444:
440:
435:
434:
433:
430:
428:
426:
420:
418:
416:
413:
410:
408:
405:
401:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
373:
368:
367:
366:
365:
362:
359:
357:
355:
348:
344:
341:
340:
335:
332:
327:
323:
321:
316:
315:
310:
306:
294:
289:
286:
282:
270:
265:
262:
258:
246:
241:
240:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
216:Kamala Harris
213:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
570:
567:
518:
489:Boston Globe
463:
371:
342:
318:
304:PEANUTBUTTER
280:PEANUTBUTTER
256:PEANUTBUTTER
219:
211:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
53:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
493:Alameda Sun
439:WP:ACADEMIC
160:free images
75:Maya Harris
67:Maya Harris
331:Courcelles
576:talk page
464:Weak keep
381:WP:AUTHOR
37:talk page
578:or in a
424:Gobōnobō
400:WP:BASIC
353:Gobōnobō
320:Relisted
119:View log
39:or in a
468:WP:PROF
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
56:MBisanz
529:WP:GNG
487:, and
483:, the
472:WP:GNG
347:WP:BIO
224:WP:GNG
212:Delete
198:Boleyn
138:Google
96:delete
295:. ★☆
271:. ★☆
247:. ★☆
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
555:talk
540:talk
501:talk
447:talk
389:talk
343:Keep
298:DUCK
274:DUCK
250:DUCK
232:talk
202:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
527:So
441:.--
307:☆★
283:☆★
259:☆★
226:.--
188:TWL
117:– (
557:)
542:)
503:)
449:)
391:)
301:IS
277:IS
253:IS
234:)
204:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
52:.
553:(
538:(
499:(
445:(
387:(
230:(
200:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.