219:
I'm not sure if it makes sense to have articles for each and every Baloch tribe but this is legitimate. Ansari Ali Sher Ali classified them as Umrani Baloch in 1901, Bombay
Education Society noted them in 1907, they show up in the 1911 Indian census as Baloch, and in 2009 Vidya Tyagi listed them as a
525:
and you will see why that department of modern academics (AnSI) is the exception to the rule. We do not pay much attention to the
Government of India's opinion regarding castes for the same reason - it is all one big political game and not remotely independent. -
377:. For example, castes/tribes came and went sometimes in a decade because people "made things up" as they jostled for socio-political advantage ... and the enumerators just took them at their word. We need modern sources. -
166:
423:
STOP stalking me. You're like one of the notorious IAC sockfarm from last year. As for your !vote, I think the book you refer to is actually a compilation of reprints from Raj publications. Useless. -
503:
Obviously your little essay is quite meaningless and self-contradictory. Having acknowledged that the AnSi's 'People of India' ('90s) is heavily Raj based, you make statements like
119:
305:
322:
160:
288:
449:
ING. That Raj publications are being used after 60 years shows how durable / solid they were, so please ride your little Raj hobby horse somewhere else and be
374:
126:
556:
17:
92:
87:
181:
96:
148:
575:
341:
661:
467:
But the Raj publications are not being widely used by modern academics, and for a good reason. See, for example,
79:
40:
637:
472:
552:
250:. A shared surname does not make for a tribe, at least here on WP, so no there is no reasonable redirect. -
142:
657:
619:
563:
512:
458:
410:
327:
310:
293:
36:
559:
508:
454:
406:
138:
507:? FYI, Risley, Rose, Monier-Williams rule the roost in the office of the Registrar General of India.
642:
632:
623:
594:
567:
535:
522:
516:
498:
484:
462:
432:
414:
386:
360:
331:
314:
297:
277:
259:
233:
210:
174:
83:
61:
592:
358:
247:
188:
555:, it has Malghani as a commonly listed tribe, and it is cited as "expert" in Pakistan circles
75:
67:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
656:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
615:
531:
494:
480:
468:
428:
382:
273:
255:
243:
229:
206:
57:
450:
446:
154:
585:
442:
351:
221:
198:
403:
239:
220:
major Baloch tribe. That said, is there enough to warrant a mention outside of the
201:. This is the third creation of this article, previously deleted via CSD and PROD.
489:
Oh, the specific publications in this instance are over 100 years' old, not 60. -
113:
551:
The 1901 Balochistan census (Hughes Buller) is still used by "modern academics".
527:
490:
476:
424:
378:
373:
For background on why the Raj census operations are not reliable, you could try
269:
251:
225:
202:
53:
631:
and draft & userfy if needed as simply none of this is solidly convincing.
505:
But the Raj publications are not being widely used by modern academics
246:. His is one of the most blatant plagiarising exercises published by
611:
606:
475:. There is no bullying or personal attacking being done by me. -
650:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
578:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
402:,3 mentions in "Balochistan Through the Ages: Tribes" (1979)
344:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
109:
105:
101:
173:
584:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
350:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
242:- the Raj stuff is not reliable - and for Tyagi see
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
664:). No further edits should be made to this page.
306:list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions
323:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
321:Note: This debate has been included in the
304:Note: This debate has been included in the
287:Note: This debate has been included in the
289:list of People-related deletion discussions
320:
303:
286:
453:in your interactions with other editors.
405:1 corresponding to the 1907 gazetteer.
268:1901 and 1907 and a census in 1911...
375:Census of India prior to independence
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
278:01:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
260:01:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
234:21:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
211:18:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
643:06:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
624:17:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
595:16:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
62:10:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
568:05:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
536:18:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
517:11:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
499:04:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
485:04:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
463:04:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
433:01:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
415:18:13, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
387:16:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
361:16:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
332:10:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
315:10:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
298:10:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
681:
653:Please do not modify it.
614:for disruptive editing.
473:User:Sitush/CasteSources
32:Please do not modify it.
523:this WP article section
553:Baluch and the Brahui
604:to closing admin;
597:
363:
334:
317:
300:
672:
655:
640:
635:
609:
590:
583:
581:
579:
356:
349:
347:
345:
330:
313:
296:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
680:
679:
675:
674:
673:
671:
670:
669:
668:
662:deletion review
651:
638:
633:
605:
598:
586:
574:
572:
364:
352:
340:
338:
326:
309:
292:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
678:
676:
667:
666:
646:
645:
634:SwisterTwister
626:
582:
571:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
487:
445:and stop your
436:
435:
418:
417:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
348:
337:
336:
335:
318:
301:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
263:
262:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
677:
665:
663:
659:
654:
648:
647:
644:
641:
636:
630:
627:
625:
621:
617:
613:
608:
603:
600:
599:
596:
593:
591:
589:
580:
577:
570:
569:
565:
561:
557:
554:
537:
533:
529:
524:
520:
519:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
501:
500:
496:
492:
488:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
420:
419:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
398:
397:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
362:
359:
357:
355:
346:
343:
333:
329:
328:North America
324:
319:
316:
312:
311:North America
307:
302:
299:
295:
294:North America
290:
285:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
265:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:Baloch tribes
218:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
652:
649:
628:
601:
587:
573:
550:
504:
399:
353:
339:
216:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
616:Vanamonde93
607:Sigmabaroda
560:Sigmabaroda
509:Sigmabaroda
455:Sigmabaroda
407:Sigmabaroda
161:free images
658:talk page
610:has been
469:WP:HISTRS
400:Weak Keep
244:WP:MIRROR
217:Weak Keep
37:talk page
660:or in a
612:indeffed
588:UY Scuti
576:Relisted
451:WP:CIVIL
447:WP:BULLY
354:UY Scuti
342:Relisted
120:View log
76:Malghani
68:Malghani
39:or in a
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
629:Delete
528:Sitush
491:Sitush
477:Sitush
443:WP:NPA
425:Sitush
379:Sitush
270:Curro2
252:Sitush
226:Curro2
224:page?
203:Sitush
199:WP:GNG
197:Fails
139:Google
97:delete
54:Stifle
50:delete
521:Read
240:WP:RS
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
639:talk
620:talk
602:Note
564:talk
532:talk
513:talk
495:talk
481:talk
471:and
459:talk
441:See
429:talk
411:talk
383:talk
274:talk
256:talk
248:Gyan
238:See
230:talk
207:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
189:TWL
118:– (
52:.
622:)
566:)
534:)
515:)
497:)
483:)
461:)
431:)
413:)
385:)
325:.
308:.
291:.
276:)
258:)
232:)
209:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
618:(
562:(
558:.
530:(
511:(
493:(
479:(
457:(
427:(
409:(
381:(
272:(
254:(
228:(
205:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.