Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Manabiya - Knowledge

Source 📝

292:
one, which publishes this work. There are hundreds of thousands of Google hits for this series. The author is famous for a previous series that was made into an anime. Since there are very few places that ever review any manga at all, and usually only those from the same parent company, and there is no possible way for them to cover every notable manga there is, that suggested guideline for establishing notability can really be taken seriously. It hurts nothing to leave the article here.
430:
author than drama writer, judging by this effort anyway -- but that's neither here nor there. Since the story is on indefinite hiatus with the plot barely getting started (still introducing new basic characters), it's unlikely to be licensed or adapted any time soon, and without reviews we've not
291:
First off, the deprodder said "deprodded. Some indication of notability, and there is no absolute rule that it needs third party review to exist)". You have a major company starting a new magazine, combining its most successful aspects from two other magazines it is ending and merging as the new
251:
Manabiya is a one-vol on hiatus series by Kojima Akira not referenced by ANN and without licensor outside Japan. It's very unlikely to find one outside Japan because that the series was put on hiatus due to author health issue. The author was forced to reduce his/her workload and is focusing on
155: 358:@Dream Focus This work isn't serialized anymore as on indefinite hiatus. There is no more a page dedicated to this series in the Square Enix website while the author still ongoing work 219: 461:
as prescribed by Quasirandom. This series is buried for years just after it started. Now if the author health could improve enough to be able to get back to it the better. --
110: 149: 115: 378: 17: 343: 236: 204: 83: 78: 170: 87: 435:
at this time or the near future. The title is, however, a valid search term (both as "Manabiya" and "Mana Biya"), so
137: 480: 328:
that demonstrate it's notable? No book is notable without third-party sources. Your argument basically comes to "
70: 36: 479:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
277: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
254: 131: 448: 366: 127: 465: 452: 409: 405: 382: 374: 347: 315: 281: 273: 262: 240: 208: 163: 74: 52: 339: 329: 232: 200: 177: 66: 58: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
444: 293: 462: 401: 370: 259: 143: 334: 227: 195: 440: 432: 397: 325: 190: 186: 49: 104: 422: 427: 193:. Deprodder claims that reliable third-part sources are not needed. — 473:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
189:
manga series with no evidence that it has received coverage by
48:. keep and merge arguments do not address the lack of sourcing 426:
notwithstanding, his doofy sense of humor makes him a better
362:
has one. This work is as dead and incomplete as it is.
100: 96: 92: 162: 220:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 483:). No further edits should be made to this page. 176: 8: 214: 416:It's just as well Kojima is focusing on 218:: This debate has been included in the 7: 272:Notability Issue. And per above. - 330:It exists, therefore it is notable 24: 431:nothing to demonstrate it passes 324:If it is notable where are the 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 443:, leaving a redirect behind. — 1: 332:", which is a non-argument. — 466:07:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 453:18:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 410:14:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 383:07:47, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 348:00:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 326:reliable third-party sources 316:18:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 282:17:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 263:14:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 241:11:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 209:11:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 191:reliable third-party sources 53:10:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC) 500: 476:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 457:Let's go for the 437:selectively merge 386: 369:comment added by 243: 223: 491: 478: 385: 363: 312: 309: 306: 303: 300: 297: 224: 181: 180: 166: 118: 108: 90: 34: 499: 498: 494: 493: 492: 490: 489: 488: 487: 481:deletion review 474: 459:selective merge 364: 310: 307: 304: 301: 298: 295: 123: 114: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 497: 495: 486: 485: 469: 468: 455: 413: 412: 390: 389: 388: 387: 353: 352: 351: 350: 319: 318: 285: 284: 274:Knowledgekid87 266: 265: 245: 244: 184: 183: 120: 116:AfD statistics 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 496: 484: 482: 477: 471: 470: 467: 464: 460: 456: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 429: 425: 424: 419: 415: 414: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 392: 391: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 361: 357: 356: 355: 354: 349: 345: 341: 337: 336: 331: 327: 323: 322: 321: 320: 317: 314: 313: 290: 287: 286: 283: 279: 275: 271: 268: 267: 264: 261: 257: 256: 250: 247: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229: 221: 217: 213: 212: 211: 210: 206: 202: 198: 197: 192: 188: 179: 175: 172: 169: 165: 161: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 129: 126: 125:Find sources: 121: 117: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 475: 472: 458: 441:Akira Kojima 436: 421: 417: 398:Akira Kojima 393: 359: 333: 294: 288: 269: 253: 248: 226: 215: 194: 185: 173: 167: 159: 152: 146: 140: 134: 124: 45: 43: 31: 28: 445:Quasirandom 365:—Preceding 187:Non-notable 150:free images 463:KrebMarkt 402:Edward321 371:KrebMarkt 260:KrebMarkt 423:Mahoraba 379:contribs 367:unsigned 111:View log 67:Manabiya 59:Manabiya 428:yonkoma 249:Comment 156:WP refs 144:scholar 84:protect 79:history 50:Spartaz 270:Delete 128:Google 88:delete 46:delete 433:WP:BK 394:Merge 335:Farix 311:Focus 228:Farix 196:Farix 171:JSTOR 132:books 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 449:talk 420:as, 406:talk 375:talk 289:Keep 278:talk 258:. -- 225:-- — 216:Note 164:FENS 138:news 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 439:to 418:Wa! 396:to 360:Wa! 255:Wa! 178:TWL 113:• 109:– ( 451:) 408:) 400:. 381:) 377:• 346:) 342:| 280:) 239:) 235:| 222:. 207:) 203:| 158:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 447:( 404:( 373:( 344:c 340:t 338:( 308:m 305:a 302:e 299:r 296:D 276:( 237:c 233:t 231:( 205:c 201:t 199:( 182:) 174:· 168:· 160:· 153:· 147:· 141:· 135:· 130:( 122:( 119:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Spartaz
10:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Manabiya
Manabiya
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Non-notable
reliable third-party sources
Farix
t

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.