438:: As the creator of the article I do not know how to respond to this nomination. Maybe a change of title would be appropiate, which was my original idea, to have a main article and create a list of number-one songs in Mexico but at the time it was not enough material. It is a Billboard chart, just as many others that are included in Knowledge that also enlist the weekly number-one song.
729:. I don't really have a preference as to which option is the best, because a good argument could be made for either one. Other people given reasons then I can for both options. So, I'm just leaving this at my "vote." I know it's not a vote, but I feel like the discussion is long enough already without me repeating points that have already been made better then I can make them. --
242:. This information is already available in the categories and individual articles for each year. Therefore this article is incorrectly designed per the name. I would expect it to contain information about the chart itself not a reproduction of the number 1 lists which already exist. It's also bizarre to talk about the nth number one single in a country. It seems like an
354:
Not a neutral source in the bunch (and most are behind paywalls or deadlinks), no mentions of the chart's methodology, and the wording's tinge is overtly connected to the performance of
American songs and charts with songs from Mexican artists being shrugged off (I'd care more for sure about the
471:
charts usually include some information about the chart itself as well as a summary of number ones, not the whole history of songs that were number one. The article is also reaching the boundaries of what's navigable per
566:: The chart was not included in the Billboard site before, but now it is listed along several other charts previously included in their billboard.biz website. I will update the links and change the name to "List of
207:
467:
charts that doesn't make them notable either. The trouble is this article doesn't serve a purpose as there is already categories for each year that list what was number one. The other articles for
432:. The article as it stands offers nothing of significance, and I can't find sources that would establish its independent notability for a stand-alone article much less a list of its number ones.
539:
If the chart itself has not received coverage in reliable sources (not even in
Billboard in which the chart is published), what makes a list of its number ones worth keeping.
201:
686:
160:
315:
522:
279:
239:
476:
and would need to be split in the future if it continued which makes no sense, given that lists/categories already exist for number one songs in Mexico. ≫ (
107:
92:
359:...because it isn't even a chart. It's just a carousel article which exists to say 'this is #1 in Mexico' with some needless picture decoration.
238:
I'm not sure what the purpose of this article is as it recreates and summarises individual articles for each year that already exist as shown at
167:
133:
128:
137:
60:
120:
87:
80:
17:
222:
189:
726:
692:
101:
97:
755:
355:
performance of domestic artists over the stations which just air
American artists and call it a day). It's not a
40:
183:
701:
668:
243:
738:
705:
672:
639:
618:
579:
556:
534:
525:
which is no different. This information cannot be clearly conveyed through a category or individual pages.
501:
447:
420:
383:
343:
307:
271:
179:
62:
530:
415:
406:
751:
608:
491:
333:
297:
261:
36:
397:
chart. I’m not sure I see the difference between this and the endless other
Billboard chart articles. (
229:
635:
575:
460:
443:
394:
58:
697:
664:
374:
356:
215:
124:
734:
660:
526:
410:
402:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
750:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
718:
627:
594:
477:
429:
319:
283:
247:
195:
631:
590:
571:
439:
398:
53:
473:
362:
116:
68:
730:
154:
393:- I’m not sure I understand the nomination. The article just says that it’s a
570:
Mexican
Airplay number ones of the 2010s" and other one for the "2020s".
463:
isn't always the best reason to cite. While other articles do exist for
746:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
593:
please don't move the article until the discussion is over. ≫ (
517:
to List of
Mexican Airplay number ones. There are many, many
684:. Note the chart does get mentions in news sources such as:
150:
146:
142:
214:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
758:). No further edits should be made to this page.
314:Note: This discussion has been included in the
278:Note: This discussion has been included in the
228:
8:
240:Category:Lists_of_number-one_songs_in_Mexico
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
659:to List of Mexican Airplay number ones per
316:list of Mexico-related deletion discussions
313:
280:list of Music-related deletion discussions
277:
521:of number one songs or albums, including
630:Absolutely, that was just my proposal.
719:Billboard charts#International charts
430:Billboard charts#International charts
7:
727:List of Mexican Airplay number ones
24:
93:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
775:
739:11:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
706:10:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
673:23:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
63:10:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
748:Please do not modify it.
640:18:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
619:18:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
580:18:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
557:15:49, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
535:04:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
502:09:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
448:02:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
421:00:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
384:20:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
344:19:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
308:19:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
272:19:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
407:R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay
457:Comment from nominator
81:Articles for deletion
395:Billboard (magazine)
244:indiscriminate list
617:
500:
403:Latin Pop Airplay
381:
346:
342:
310:
306:
270:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
766:
616:
613:
605:
601:
598:
555:
551:
548:
545:
542:
499:
496:
488:
484:
481:
418:
413:
382:
377:
371:
370:
365:
341:
338:
330:
326:
323:
305:
302:
294:
290:
287:
269:
266:
258:
254:
251:
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
774:
773:
769:
768:
767:
765:
764:
763:
762:
756:deletion review
693:Jamica Observer
632:Javier Espinoza
609:
606:
599:
596:
572:Javier Espinoza
553:
549:
546:
543:
540:
492:
489:
482:
479:
440:Javier Espinoza
416:
411:
399:Country Airplay
375:
368:
363:
360:
334:
331:
324:
321:
298:
295:
288:
285:
262:
259:
252:
249:
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
772:
770:
761:
760:
742:
741:
711:
710:
709:
708:
698:Britishfinance
676:
675:
665:Britishfinance
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
622:
621:
583:
582:
561:
560:
559:
519:featured lists
507:
506:
505:
504:
451:
450:
433:
423:
387:
386:
348:
347:
311:
236:
235:
172:
117:Mexico Airplay
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
69:Mexico Airplay
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
771:
759:
757:
753:
749:
744:
743:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
713:
712:
707:
703:
699:
695:
694:
689:
688:
683:
680:
679:
678:
677:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
651:
650:
641:
637:
633:
629:
626:
625:
624:
623:
620:
614:
612:
603:
602:
592:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
562:
558:
538:
537:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
509:
508:
503:
497:
495:
486:
485:
475:
470:
466:
462:
461:WP:OTHERSTUFF
458:
455:
454:
453:
452:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
431:
427:
424:
422:
419:
414:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
389:
388:
385:
380:
378:
367:
366:
358:
353:
350:
349:
345:
339:
337:
328:
327:
317:
312:
309:
303:
301:
292:
291:
281:
276:
275:
274:
273:
267:
265:
256:
255:
245:
241:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
747:
745:
722:
714:
691:
685:
681:
661:Thankyoubaby
656:
652:
610:
595:
567:
563:
527:Thankyoubaby
518:
514:
510:
493:
478:
468:
464:
456:
435:
425:
412:Sergecross73
390:
372:
361:
357:WP:BADCHARTS
351:
335:
320:
299:
284:
263:
248:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
74:
54:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
628:Lil-unique1
409:, etc etc)
202:free images
591:Jaespinoza
55:Ritchie333
752:talk page
568:Billboard
469:Billboard
465:Billboard
37:talk page
754:or in a
731:Adamant1
715:Redirect
523:this one
426:Redirect
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
682:Comment
600:Unique1
564:Comment
483:Unique1
474:WP:SIZE
436:Comment
391:Comment
376:chatter
325:Unique1
289:Unique1
253:Unique1
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
690:, and
544:cheers
417:msg me
352:Delete
180:Google
138:delete
696:etc.
547:peaks
318:. ≫ (
282:. ≫ (
246:. ≫ (
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
735:talk
723:move
702:talk
669:talk
657:Move
653:Keep
636:talk
611:Talk
597:Lil-
576:talk
554:wars
552:lost
550:news
541:Star
531:talk
515:Move
511:Keep
494:Talk
480:Lil-
444:talk
364:Nate
336:Talk
322:Lil-
300:Talk
286:Lil-
264:Talk
250:Lil-
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
725:to
721:or
717:to
687:MSN
655:or
607:-{
513:or
490:-{
428:to
332:-{
296:-{
260:-{
230:TWL
159:– (
737:)
704:)
671:)
663:.
638:)
615:}-
604:)
578:)
533:)
498:}-
487:)
459:-
446:)
405:,
401:,
340:}-
329:)
304:}-
293:)
268:}-
257:)
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
52:.
733:(
700:(
667:(
634:(
574:(
529:(
442:(
379:)
373:(
369:•
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.