Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Interview/Archive 1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

80:
Is there even any need for it? It's and interview process; is it just becuase it's Microsoft that it gets its own page? People should be fairly familiar with the interview process. If it is not to be deleted, then perhaps merge with
21: 98:; what makes this kind of interview different from the one done by other companies? How to move Mt. Fuji seems the classical inane question asked at these interviews. 125: 147:
It is rumored that a final as-appropriate Development Manager interview would be arranged if the interviewee seems quite promising.
197: 185: 167: 136: 107: 89: 68: 17: 116: 132: 215: 40: 103: 214:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
99: 74: 33:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
181: 149:- so the author missed off at least one stage they evidently experienced: the FOAD letter... 164: 62: 86: 176: 53: 160: 82: 194: 128: 208:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
as adding precisely nothing to the sum of human knowledge.
159:to demonstrate the uniqueness of an interview with 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 218:). No further edits should be made to this page. 163:. However, it doesn't deserve its own page. -- 8: 7: 28: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 198:01:02, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 186:00:00, 20 November 2005 (UTC) 168:19:31, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 137:18:49, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 108:18:27, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 90:16:37, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 69:18:09, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 48:The result of the debate was 235: 211:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 75:Microsoft Interview 22:Microsoft Interview 59: 226: 213: 120: 100:Paolo Liberatore 55: 38: 234: 233: 229: 228: 227: 225: 224: 223: 222: 216:deletion review 209: 127: 118: 78: 65: 58: 41:deletion review 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 232: 230: 221: 220: 203: 201: 200: 188: 170: 153: 152: 151: 150: 140: 139: 124: 110: 77: 72: 63: 56: 46: 45: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 231: 219: 217: 212: 206: 205: 204: 199: 196: 192: 189: 187: 184: 183: 178: 174: 171: 169: 166: 162: 158: 155: 154: 148: 144: 143: 142: 141: 138: 135: 134: 130: 126: 122: 114: 111: 109: 105: 101: 97: 94: 93: 92: 91: 88: 84: 76: 73: 71: 70: 66: 61: 51: 44: 42: 37: 31: 30: 23: 19: 210: 207: 202: 193:as per nom. 190: 180: 172: 156: 146: 131: 112: 95: 79: 49: 47: 35: 32: 177:User:Ejrrjs 57:vandalproof 165:Ukdragon37 161:Microsoft 121:you know? 117:Just zis 87:Kilo-Lima 83:Microsoft 175:per nom 54:drini's 20:‎ | 52:. -- ( 191:Delete 173:Delete 145:p.s.: 113:Delete 96:Delete 50:delete 182:What? 179:says 157:Merge 16:< 133:AfD? 119:Guy, 104:Talk 60:page 195:MCB 129:(W) 106:) 85:? 67:) 123:/ 102:( 64:☎

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
Microsoft Interview
deletion review
drini's vandalproof page

18:09, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Microsoft Interview
Microsoft
Kilo-Lima
16:37, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Paolo Liberatore
Talk
18:27, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Just zis  Guy, you know?

(W)
AfD?
18:49, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Microsoft
Ukdragon37
19:31, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
User:Ejrrjs
What?
00:00, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
MCB
01:02, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.