317:. Appreciate the evaluation for the Milan Zrnic page. I’m an educator in Europe and felt compelled to create a page for Zrnic when I discovered he has very little online presence. He is extremely respected in several industries and has clearly chosen to remain private with regards to online press and online documentation. This actually seems to be a trend with emerging artists. Is there a way cultural figures like him can have accessible and encyclopedic biographies without internet-specific press? I know it would help several students engage with a contemporary curriculum. In the art world, credits and affiliations are essentially citations—if only because most artists are associated with movements and styles. It is uncommon to have a newspaper article or cultural institution specifically profile an artist unless they have reached a mature stage of their career. Perhaps this is why the verbiage in my page skews promotional? I was hoping to add several artist pages like Zrnic's, but now feel discouraged with the negative feedback.
384:
the information must be immediately accessible to the average person. Not a very sound practice for
Knowledge, as publications and journals are very often localized to regions and continents of the world. Should I be scanning these materials and archiving them on a website for every artist that needs to be added into this database? If I do, I feel as if the citation will be killed for being an unreliable source. As I said before, credits and affiliations hold more value in these subjects, for all artists are a part of a greater movement or style of work...and these movements are more traditionally embraced in encyclopedic form. Would it be more acceptable to attach the contemporary artists I'd like to create entries for onto existing entries for their respective movements and styles?
551:. He's a designer and photographer who's verifiably of some minor notability; but the web offers so little about him that the article seems desperate. Meanwhile, although one contributor alludes above to the existence of sources beyond Google's reach, nothing is forthcoming. If this is person is "emerging", wait until he has emerged. --
52:. The subject of the article is verifiable, and there is information available on him. However, the consensus is that at the moment there isn't quite enough to meet Knowledge inclusion criteria. As the subject may become notable, or further sources may be found that indicate notability, I would be happy to do a
383:
For artists who have an anti-mainstream sensibility, how do you suggest they receive their due
Knowledge entries? Anti-mainstream sensibility can very well mean engaging lightly with social media and not on an archival plane (personal website). Hardcopy evidence is abundant, but other users have said
221:
when he was 15, but coverage is very thin. Even if he is potentially notable, which I kind of doubt, this article has very little salvageable text in it. It's full of unsubstantiated claims (which I can't substantiate via Google) and promotion. The article does claim an award, but Google does not
446:
I appreciate your thorough response but it is not as objective as you hope for it to be. I am left with more questions than answers! Upon reviewing your user page, I have discovered that we mention Zrnic's work in our curriculum alongside some of the artists you have created articles for. In fact,
342:
merely an unrelated namesake? Another possibility that occurs to me is that people running other websites just aren't interested. (2) Web sources aren't necessary; people -- though not necessarily "cultural figures like him" -- can have biographies on the strength of what's published about them on
387:
As I mentioned to another user, I'm unsure of "emerging" considered a red flag, or "too soon" being a valid debate. We live in a world where emerging artists, activists, and politicians are more important to contemporary curriculum than notable and established figures. I'm sure you've recognized
418:
No. For example, information published in
Serbian periodicals would be acceptable if these were available in Serbian libraries. Of course, most people have no access (or at best, difficult and expensive access) to Serbian libraries; but if people in Serbia have access, that's enough. ¶
414:, showing what seem to me very conventional fashion photos. Of course I don't purport to be a judge of the quality of fashion photos, and defer to the judgment of people who know. Where is this? (Or is Instagram-using Zrnic a different Zrnic?) ¶
388:
this. Not interested in creating an online presence for contemporary artists, but interested in creating articles that will undoubtedly grow and evolve in the next year as their notability becomes more apparent to the general public.
427:
Actually I haven't, no. Certainly, some "emerging" people will soon enough be of major importance. Well, wait till they have emerged. If you think that an "emerging" person really is of outstanding significance despite (or even
173:
248:
486:. User above raises valid concerns. Does not warrant scrutiny. Citations in original entry are legitimate, perhaps could use a few more credits or "affiliations" to further current notability.
226:'s own web site). Any hits that I've been able to find have been trivial mentions, such as photo credits in reliable sources. The articles themselves do not seem to be about him. It's
425:
We live in a world where emerging artists, activists, and politicians are more important to contemporary curriculum than notable and established figures. I'm sure you've recognized this.
593:. Nothing approaching reliable sources directly detailing applied or found in a reasonable search. While it's possible offline sources exist, none are presented so far in this process.
126:
363:
270:
167:
292:
432:) the little attention paid to him or her, and think that this person merits publicity, excellent: write them up in a blog entry or similar. But not here. --
421:
Would it be more acceptable to attach the contemporary artists I'd like to create entries for onto existing entries for their respective movements and styles?
447:
there are several artists I was hoping to create articles for that reference the artists you are passionate about. Looking forward to bridging the gap. --
338:: (1) It's not clear to me that "he has clearly chosen to remain private with regards to online press and online documentation". Or is the person who
133:
501:
404:
Anti-mainstream sensibility can very well mean engaging lightly with social media and not on an archival plane (personal website).
218:
99:
94:
17:
103:
188:
155:
86:
343:
paper. What sources on paper can you offer? (3) I decided to take a look at his website. Its top page is blank. --
235:
402:
Their sensibility doesn't directly determine their notability (in the sense which the word is used hereabouts). ¶
621:
400:
For artists who have an anti-mainstream sensibility, how do you suggest they receive their due
Knowledge entries?
40:
204:
I strongly question the notability of this person (also per tagging). Page is very promotional in language.
149:
491:
452:
393:
322:
53:
617:
536:
367:
231:
145:
36:
602:
585:
560:
539:
513:
495:
487:
470:
456:
448:
441:
389:
370:
352:
335:
326:
318:
306:
284:
262:
239:
208:
68:
90:
581:
407:
301:
279:
257:
195:
181:
82:
74:
65:
598:
227:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
616:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
525:
406:
Zrnic has a website but seems to have kept it blank for some time. Before it was blank (eg
556:
509:
466:
437:
416:
other users have said the information must be immediately accessible to the average person
348:
161:
577:
296:
274:
252:
205:
58:
594:
569:
223:
120:
573:
552:
505:
462:
461:
Could you provide a link here to your curriculum? It would be fascinating. --
433:
378:
344:
528:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
411:
339:
610:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
249:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
116:
112:
108:
180:
535:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
576:, and the keep votes are not based on policies.--
410:), it hardly scintillated. Zrnic or his namesake
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
624:). No further edits should be made to this page.
364:list of Photography-related deletion discussions
271:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions
222:return any relevant results for this (including
568:, it seems that at the moment we do not have
194:
8:
362:Note: This debate has been included in the
291:Note: This debate has been included in the
269:Note: This debate has been included in the
247:Note: This debate has been included in the
293:list of People-related deletion discussions
361:
290:
268:
246:
230:to create an article on this person.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
502:the first and so far only edit
396:) 7:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
1:
603:20:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
586:08:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
561:08:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
540:02:30, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
471:14:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
457:06:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
69:20:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
514:00:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
496:10:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
442:00:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
423:No, it probably wouldn't. ¶
371:08:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
353:08:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
327:21:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
307:04:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
285:04:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
263:04:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
240:03:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
209:03:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
641:
613:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
504:by "criticalwiki". --
332:Comments and questions
54:Knowledge:Userfication
408:on 19 February 2008
219:his local newspaper
48:The result was
542:
373:
309:
287:
265:
632:
615:
570:reliable sources
534:
530:
382:
304:
299:
282:
277:
260:
255:
232:NinjaRobotPirate
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
61:
34:
640:
639:
635:
634:
633:
631:
630:
629:
628:
622:deletion review
611:
523:
430:as suggested by
376:
302:
297:
280:
275:
258:
253:
217:. He got into
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
59:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
638:
636:
627:
626:
606:
605:
588:
572:demonstrating
563:
545:
544:
543:
532:
531:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
412:uses Instagram
385:
374:
358:
357:
356:
355:
340:uses Instagram
311:
310:
288:
266:
243:
242:
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
637:
625:
623:
619:
614:
608:
607:
604:
600:
596:
592:
589:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
564:
562:
558:
554:
550:
547:
546:
541:
538:
533:
529:
527:
522:
521:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
481:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
458:
454:
450:
445:
444:
443:
439:
435:
431:
426:
422:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
397:
395:
391:
386:
380:
375:
372:
369:
365:
360:
359:
354:
350:
346:
341:
337:
333:
330:
329:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:
312:
308:
305:
300:
294:
289:
286:
283:
278:
272:
267:
264:
261:
256:
250:
245:
244:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
207:
206:Dirk Beetstra
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
67:
66:
63:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
612:
609:
590:
565:
548:
537:NorthAmerica
524:
488:criticalwiki
483:
449:Stephenphoto
429:
424:
420:
415:
403:
399:
390:Stephenphoto
368:NorthAmerica
336:Stephenphoto
331:
319:Stephenphoto
314:
224:Graphis Inc.
214:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
64:
57:
56:on request.
49:
47:
31:
28:
168:free images
83:Milan Zrnic
75:Milan Zrnic
574:notability
303:talk to me
281:talk to me
259:talk to me
618:talk page
578:Ymblanter
298:Jinkinson
276:Jinkinson
254:Jinkinson
37:talk page
620:or in a
526:Relisted
500:This is
228:too soon
127:View log
60:SilkTork
39:or in a
595:BusterD
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
591:Delete
566:Delete
549:Delete
215:Delete
146:Google
104:delete
50:delete
553:Hoary
506:Hoary
463:Hoary
434:Hoary
379:Hoary
345:Hoary
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
599:talk
582:talk
557:talk
510:talk
492:talk
484:Keep
467:talk
453:talk
438:talk
394:talk
349:talk
334:for
323:talk
315:Keep
236:talk
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
196:TWL
125:– (
601:)
584:)
559:)
512:)
494:)
469:)
455:)
440:)
366:.
351:)
325:)
295:.
273:.
251:.
238:)
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
597:(
580:(
555:(
508:(
490:(
465:(
451:(
436:(
392:(
381::
377:@
347:(
321:(
234:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.