451:
is unfamiliar with the
Caldecott Medal. Essentially this is the children's literature equivalent of winning the Academy Award for Best Film. It's THE award as far as American children's literature goes. It's granted by the American Library Association, which is one of the biggest authorities on
452:
library science in the United States. They also of course cover literature and are influential in that sphere as well. There's really not a bigger or more influential award that a kid's book could really win as far as US specific awards go.
211:
273:
168:
205:
295:
269:
115:
100:
391:: The award makes it notable (but it's not one I'm familiar with, so I could understand perhaps why the nom was made.). This in Common Sense Media
265:
141:
136:
145:
316:
128:
489:
226:
95:
88:
17:
193:
368:. Per the article lead, "The illustrations in the book earned Rohmann the Caldecott Medal in 2003." Therefore it passes
172:
109:
105:
377:
187:
511:
459:
40:
493:
466:
439:
403:
381:
358:
321:
287:
257:
70:
183:
352:
373:
507:
311:
233:
132:
66:
36:
474:: If it won a major award and has a televison show based off of it, it's most likely notable enough.
485:
477:
453:
430:
399:
219:
392:
344:
199:
84:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
506:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
412:
339:
300:
124:
76:
62:
481:
369:
335:
331:
283:
253:
53:
411:
Won a major children's literature award and had a TV series inspired by it. A miserable
418:
395:
58:
243:
277:
247:
162:
448:
52:. Consensus seems that the award is significant enough to justify meeting
502:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
158:
154:
150:
218:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
514:). No further edits should be made to this page.
294:Note: This discussion has been included in the
264:Note: This discussion has been included in the
296:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
232:
8:
116:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
475:
372:point 2 (winning a major literary award).
293:
263:
7:
246:. tagged unsourced since july. ltb
24:
268:lists for the following topics:
101:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
494:02:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
467:17:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
440:23:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
404:16:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
382:14:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
359:13:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
322:11:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
288:08:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
258:08:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
71:12:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
244:general notability guideline
447:: I'm going to assume that
91:(AfD)? Read these primers!
531:
504:Please do not modify it.
394:also helps notability.
32:Please do not modify it.
457:(formerly Tokyogirl79)
173:edits since nomination
338:. One wonders if any
89:Articles for deletion
274:Comics and animation
59:(non-admin closure)
496:
480:comment added by
458:
437:
324:
290:
106:Guide to deletion
96:How to contribute
61:
522:
463:
456:
438:
433:
427:
426:
421:
374:CohenTheBohemian
357:
355:
351:
347:
319:
314:
307:
303:
280:
266:deletion sorting
250:
237:
236:
222:
166:
148:
125:My Friend Rabbit
86:
77:My Friend Rabbit
57:
34:
530:
529:
525:
524:
523:
521:
520:
519:
518:
512:deletion review
461:
454:ReaderofthePack
431:
424:
419:
416:
353:
349:
345:
343:
332:Caldecott Medal
317:
312:
305:
301:
278:
248:
179:
139:
123:
120:
83:
80:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
528:
526:
517:
516:
498:
497:
469:
442:
406:
385:
384:
362:
361:
342:was attempted.
334:makes it meet
325:
291:
240:
239:
176:
119:
118:
113:
103:
98:
81:
79:
74:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
527:
515:
513:
509:
505:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
473:
470:
468:
465:
464:
455:
450:
446:
443:
441:
436:
434:
423:
422:
414:
410:
407:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
363:
360:
356:
348:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
323:
320:
315:
310:
309:
308:
297:
292:
289:
285:
281:
275:
271:
267:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
245:
235:
231:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
181:Find sources:
177:
174:
170:
164:
160:
156:
152:
147:
143:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
121:
117:
114:
111:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
93:
92:
90:
85:
78:
75:
73:
72:
68:
64:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
503:
501:
476:— Preceding
471:
460:
444:
428:
417:
408:
388:
365:
327:
304:
299:
241:
229:
223:
215:
208:
202:
196:
190:
180:
82:
49:
47:
31:
28:
206:free images
63:NotAGenious
482:TheOmniDex
270:Television
508:talk page
415:failure.
413:WP:BEFORE
396:Oaktree b
340:WP:BEFORE
306:Quidditch
37:talk page
510:or in a
490:contribs
478:unsigned
370:WP:NBOOK
336:WP:NBOOK
169:View log
110:glossary
54:WP:NBOOK
39:or in a
462:(｡◕‿◕｡)
445:Comment
432:chatter
354:Shalott
212:WP refs
200:scholar
142:protect
137:history
87:New to
242:fails
184:Google
146:delete
449:ltbdl
276:. ltb
227:JSTOR
188:books
163:views
155:watch
151:links
16:<
486:talk
472:Keep
420:Nate
409:Keep
400:talk
389:Keep
378:talk
366:Keep
346:Lady
328:Keep
284:talk
272:and
254:talk
220:FENS
194:news
159:logs
133:talk
129:edit
67:talk
50:keep
282:l (
252:l (
234:TWL
167:– (
492:)
488:•
402:)
380:)
350:of
330:-
302:WC
298:.
286:)
256:)
214:)
171:|
161:|
157:|
153:|
149:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
69:)
56:.
484:(
435:)
429:(
425:•
398:(
376:(
318:✎
313:☎
279:d
249:d
238:)
230:·
224:·
216:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
186:(
178:(
175:)
165:)
127:(
112:)
108:(
65:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.