Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Noah Sammak - Knowledge

Source 📝

310:
museums.. The subjects contribution the Justin bieber's Song Yummy is verifiable on Billboard, point (A) being met when the lyrics that the subject wrote for the Song mentioned above Rose to number 2 on Billboard's charts, and point (B) is validated by the fact that the song Yummy has a huge following (over 80 millions views on Youtube/has it's own Knowledge article that links back to the subject that is being deleted. As far as notability goes, according to General notability guideline, the second point covers editorial integrity, i cited Billboard and kkbox which are reputable sources of information in the music world and i quote :Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability. I do not believe we need tens or hundreds of sources to make a subject notable , just one or two reliable ones are enough--
461:
just copied down the lyrics and credits from a lyrics site (possibly the aforementioned one) due them having gotten credits wrong in the past and due to literally no other reliable secondary sources mentioning Noah as a writer in any of the songs that he has been claimed to write on. They have also
309:
Knowledge:Notability states that and i quote The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or
370:
After I had removed tumblr, instagram, and the cowriting of yummy with two other people, there was almost nothing left at all, and certainly nothing that I could see that contributes to notability. There is only one copy in total of one book by the subject held across all major libraries in
483:
under Knowledge's rules for notability. Yes, he has gotten some real co-writing credits for songs by Bieber and a few others, and that is accurately reflected in the media, but nobody has done any "who is this guy?" investigation on him specifically, in order to provide
488:
media coverage to confer notability. I also concur with the previous voters on the status of his book, which is probably a self-promoted vanity publication and it if it wasn't, it still has not received any reliable media coverage either.
348:
The question of notability is not just the contribution to one song, in fact few songs, also in the article there is a mention of a book written by the subject and reference to it, so i disagree that it falls under
213: 402:
the sources are independent enough ( google books, Billboard..) i did not fabricate those. Aoziwe what are you talking about? removing tumblr, instagram? how is that related to this subject?--
435:
Per arguments above and because the subject has (very likely) promoted themselves various times in the past on Knowledge without any valid secondary sources to back them up.--
166: 289: 207: 269: 113: 98: 252:. The subject has songwriting credits with some notable artists, but I was not able to find any significant coverage of him in independent sources. – 416:
When I did seaches I discounted all the self published and dubious reliabilty or non reliable sites that come up referrring to the subject.
457:
The company gets it lyrics and credits via member submittions, thus making its usage as a secondary source unreliable. I'm pretty sure that
173: 504: 139: 134: 93: 86: 17: 371:
Australia, and looks like for the purposes of notability a non event, so the cowriting is a single event. Perhaps TOOSOON?
143: 228: 195: 126: 107: 103: 462:
contradicted themselves multiple times in the past in articles, so they're reliability is questionable on occasion.--
297: 277: 257: 551: 40: 525:. I found nothing in Google newspapers, nothing relevant/reliable on books, and two unreliable sources on news. 189: 500: 393: 547: 293: 273: 253: 185: 36: 534: 509: 471: 444: 425: 411: 397: 389: 380: 362: 340: 319: 301: 281: 261: 68: 130: 467: 440: 407: 358: 315: 235: 221: 491: 350: 328: 245: 122: 74: 64: 59:
applies of subject makes the big time. Thanks everyone for contributing and assuming good faith!
530: 518: 480: 327:, per nom. The whole question of notability is the contribution to one song. This falls under 82: 53: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
546:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
454: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
522: 485: 421: 376: 336: 56: 201: 463: 436: 403: 354: 311: 249: 60: 526: 160: 417: 372: 332: 331:, there needs to be evidence of sustained coverage, and that's not present. 388:
Insufficient independent sources and at this point, does not meet WP:GNG.
542:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
453:
references from the article due to information in this link:
455:
https://help.kkbox.com/sg/en/function/playing-setting/1936
156: 152: 148: 220: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 554:). No further edits should be made to this page. 288:Note: This discussion has been included in the 268:Note: This discussion has been included in the 290:list of Australia-related deletion discussions 234: 8: 114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 270:list of Poetry-related deletion discussions 287: 267: 7: 449:I wanted to add that I removed the 24: 99:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 244:Non-notable writer who fails 535:20:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC) 510:22:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 472:18:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 445:18:15, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 426:03:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 412:17:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 398:16:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 381:10:09, 18 January 2020 (UTC) 363:01:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC) 341:23:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC) 320:18:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC) 302:16:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC) 282:16:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC) 262:16:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC) 69:16:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 89:(AfD)? Read these primers! 571: 544:Please do not modify it. 486:reliable and significant 32:Please do not modify it. 87:Articles for deletion 479:- Charitably it is 495: 304: 284: 104:Guide to deletion 94:How to contribute 562: 508: 493: 294:Lord Bolingbroke 274:Lord Bolingbroke 254:Lord Bolingbroke 239: 238: 224: 176: 164: 146: 84: 52:. Appears to be 34: 570: 569: 565: 564: 563: 561: 560: 559: 558: 552:deletion review 490: 181: 172: 137: 121: 118: 81: 78: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 568: 566: 557: 556: 538: 537: 512: 474: 447: 430: 429: 428: 400: 383: 365: 343: 322: 306: 305: 285: 242: 241: 178: 117: 116: 111: 101: 96: 79: 77: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 567: 555: 553: 549: 545: 540: 539: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 513: 511: 506: 502: 498: 497: 487: 482: 478: 475: 473: 469: 465: 460: 456: 452: 448: 446: 442: 438: 434: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 414: 413: 409: 405: 401: 399: 395: 391: 387: 384: 382: 378: 374: 369: 366: 364: 360: 356: 352: 347: 344: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 323: 321: 317: 313: 308: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 286: 283: 279: 275: 271: 266: 265: 264: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 237: 233: 230: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 187: 184: 183:Find sources: 179: 175: 171: 168: 162: 158: 154: 150: 145: 141: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119: 115: 112: 109: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 91: 90: 88: 83: 76: 73: 71: 70: 66: 62: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 543: 541: 514: 492: 476: 458: 450: 432: 390:PenulisHantu 385: 367: 345: 324: 243: 231: 225: 217: 210: 204: 198: 192: 182: 169: 80: 49: 47: 31: 28: 351:WP:ONEEVENT 329:WP:ONEEVENT 246:WP:CREATIVE 208:free images 123:Noah Sammak 75:Noah Sammak 519:WP:TOOSOON 494:DOOMSDAYER 54:WP:TOOSOON 548:talk page 523:WP:SIGCOV 464:DovahDuck 459:Billboard 437:DovahDuck 404:Nimroftem 355:Nimroftem 312:Nimroftem 57:WP:REFUND 37:talk page 550:or in a 505:Contribs 481:too soon 167:View log 108:glossary 61:Missvain 39:or in a 527:Bearian 214:WP refs 202:scholar 140:protect 135:history 85:New to 515:Delete 477:Delete 433:Delete 418:Aoziwe 386:Delete 373:Aoziwe 368:Delete 333:Ifnord 325:Delete 250:WP:GNG 186:Google 144:delete 50:delete 451:KKbox 229:JSTOR 190:books 174:Stats 161:views 153:watch 149:links 16:< 531:talk 521:and 517:per 501:Talk 468:talk 441:talk 422:talk 408:talk 394:talk 377:talk 359:talk 346:Keep 337:talk 316:talk 298:talk 292:. – 278:talk 272:. – 258:talk 248:and 222:FENS 196:news 157:logs 131:talk 127:edit 65:talk 496:520 489:--- 236:TWL 165:– ( 533:) 470:) 443:) 424:) 410:) 396:) 379:) 361:) 353:-- 339:) 318:) 300:) 280:) 260:) 216:) 159:| 155:| 151:| 147:| 142:| 138:| 133:| 129:| 67:) 529:( 507:) 503:| 499:( 466:( 439:( 420:( 406:( 392:( 375:( 357:( 335:( 314:( 296:( 276:( 256:( 240:) 232:· 226:· 218:· 211:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 188:( 180:( 177:) 170:· 163:) 125:( 110:) 106:( 63:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
WP:TOOSOON
WP:REFUND
Missvain
talk
16:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Noah Sammak

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Noah Sammak
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.