365:
367:
363:
433:
AfD has a large backlog at this time. Sometimes people spend more time debating topic notability rather than simply finding/adding reliable sources and improving articles, when significant coverage in reliable sources is available. I've rescued many articles that would have likely been deleted, per
369:
nothing here, the article says the band "are relatively unknown" and "set to release an album in 2010" so no one's even maintaining it, what are you actually waiting for? Can a discussion now not be closed unless it has a certain number of comments on it or some other ridiculous nonsense criterion?
392:
Sometimes when people don't respond to entries here at
Articles for deletion, listings are re-listed in hopes of obtaining consensus. Sometimes Knowledge administrators don't actually view the links and analyze notability of the topic, and instead just base the verdict upon consensus in the
406:
I was under the impression that relist was only supposed to be used in cases like where everyone votes delete due to lack of sources for the first 6 days then someone says "keep, I jsut added 100 sources" on day 7, or when the only votes are vague
161:
438:
guidelines. I've noticed this disturbing trend for quite some time now. Perhaps it's all about maintaining an impetus for deletion, rather than actual topic notability, at least in some cases. Of course,
300:
155:
393:
discussion; while the former is preferential (topic notability analysis), sometimes time constraints prevent this, and the latter occurs (consensus per the discussion).
443:
topics don't receive enough coverage in third-party reliable sources to qualify topic notability in
Knowledge, but not all of them listed in these AfD discussions are
116:
225:
411:("d nn" and "keep - useful"), not when there's no controversy whatsoever. I have noticed AfD discussions are taking longer and longer to close recently.
121:
89:
84:
93:
76:
471:- After several searches, not finding coverage in reliable sources for this band. At this time, the topic appears to fail Knowledge's
434:"consensus" in AfD discussions, because they were based upon the consensus to delete for the sake of deletion, rather than actual
176:
347:
143:
17:
362:
Sorry but why is this getting repeatedly relisted? It seems pretty uncontroversial that the band is non-notable? e.g.
137:
566:
40:
547:
518:
500:
483:
455:
428:
401:
387:
353:
314:
289:
265:
245:
217:
58:
200:, searching for sources is made difficult by Maya. If this is deleted, please replace the page with a redirect.
133:
80:
496:
417:
376:
234:
206:
183:
562:
478:
450:
396:
36:
527:. Lack of significant coverage found in independent, reliable sources; subject does not appear to meet
342:
169:
72:
64:
149:
492:
414:
373:
310:
261:
231:
203:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
561:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
325:
275:
197:
193:
532:
514:
337:
538:
528:
472:
286:
54:
306:
257:
110:
435:
328:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
278:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
510:
555:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
475:
for inclusion as a stand-alone article in the encyclopedia.
301:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
106:
102:
98:
168:
335:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →
285:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
196:who uses the same name but this band seems to fail
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
569:). No further edits should be made to this page.
182:
8:
509:: No notability provided after two relists.
370:I'll remember to just use PROD in future...
299:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:Note: This debate has been included in the
298:
226:list of Music-related deletion discussions
223:
7:
447:non-notable per just being listed.
24:
192:I came here to add a dab link to
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
473:General notability guideline
586:
266:17:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
256:No evidence of notability.
246:16:27, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
218:16:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
409:and contradict each other
558:Please do not modify it.
548:22:59, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
519:20:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
501:17:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
484:10:46, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
456:10:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
429:10:25, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
402:10:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
388:09:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
354:09:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
59:23:21, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
315:16:06, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
290:19:38, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
73:Nocturnal Sunshine
65:Nocturnal Sunshine
546:
482:
454:
400:
356:
317:
304:
292:
248:
577:
560:
545:
542:
536:
481:
479:Northamerica1000
476:
453:
451:Northamerica1000
448:
427:
425:
424:
399:
397:Northamerica1000
394:
386:
384:
383:
352:
350:
345:
340:
334:
330:
305:
284:
280:
244:
242:
241:
216:
214:
213:
187:
186:
172:
124:
114:
96:
48:The result was
34:
585:
584:
580:
579:
578:
576:
575:
574:
573:
567:deletion review
556:
540:
537:
477:
449:
423:
420:
418:
412:
395:
382:
379:
377:
371:
348:
343:
338:
336:
323:
273:
240:
237:
235:
229:
212:
209:
207:
201:
194:Maya Jane Coles
129:
120:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
583:
581:
572:
571:
551:
550:
504:
503:
486:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
421:
380:
359:
358:
357:
332:
331:
320:
319:
318:
295:
294:
293:
282:
281:
270:
269:
268:
250:
249:
238:
210:
190:
189:
126:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
582:
570:
568:
564:
559:
553:
552:
549:
544:
543:
534:
530:
526:
523:
522:
521:
520:
516:
512:
508:
502:
498:
494:
490:
487:
485:
480:
474:
470:
467:
466:
457:
452:
446:
445:automatically
442:
437:
432:
431:
430:
426:
416:
410:
405:
404:
403:
398:
391:
390:
389:
385:
375:
368:
366:
364:
361:
360:
355:
351:
346:
341:
333:
329:
327:
322:
321:
316:
312:
308:
302:
297:
296:
291:
288:
283:
279:
277:
272:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
251:
247:
243:
233:
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
205:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
557:
554:
539:
524:
506:
505:
488:
468:
444:
440:
408:
324:
274:
253:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
156:free images
436:Notability
563:talk page
541:Gongshow
491:Per GNG.
307:• Gene93k
37:talk page
565:or in a
415:filelake
374:filelake
326:Relisted
287:ItsZippy
276:Relisted
232:filelake
204:filelake
198:WP:MUSIC
117:View log
55:MastCell
39:or in a
533:WP:BAND
258:JoelWhy
162:WP refs
150:scholar
90:protect
85:history
529:WP:GNG
525:Delete
507:Delete
489:Delete
469:Delete
254:Delete
134:Google
94:delete
50:delete
493:Sarah
344:music
177:JSTOR
138:books
122:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
515:talk
511:SL93
497:talk
441:some
419:shoe
378:shoe
311:talk
262:talk
236:shoe
208:shoe
170:FENS
144:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
531:or
349:ian
184:TWL
119:•
115:– (
535:.
517:)
499:)
413:-
372:-
313:)
303:.
264:)
230:-
228:.
202:-
164:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
513:(
495:(
422:
381:
339:B
309:(
260:(
239:
211:
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.