125:
material from paper encyclopedias into
Knowledge. For that reason, I suspect though can't prove that this entire article may be a copyvio. Even if that weren't the case, however, the fact is that this is a total dog's breakfast of an article. The topic may well be encyclopedic, but without anyone coming forward in well over a year to rewrite it, and without myself having the time to research the (large) subject extensively, it's just a mess that would probably put off anyone wanting to write about Native experiences in the second world war.
268:. This is absolutely a notable topic and needs sourcing and cleanup. I don't find it a terrible mess, either, just wanting in referenced material. For starters, 2500 struck me as an exceptionally low estimate for Native Americans in the military during the war; the Pentagon estimates over 44,000 served
388:
I'm a bit sceptical of the overall value of many of these 'groups in World War II' articles (the material would be better placed in the relevant national histories of WWII or articles on the plight of the relevant group), but this topic seems notable and it should be possible to find references.
124:
article. Essentially, I just hived off a big chunk of off-topic text and created an article to cover it (this action was approved by the mediator in the original dispute). Since then, the disruptive editor has been revealed to be someone who had already been banned for copying large amounts of
242:
While the article is in need of references and cleanup, neither is reason for deletion, particularly since the topic is notable and sources most certainly exist. (Hey, they've made blockbuster movies about it!) At the very least, the article can be either stubbed, redirected to
344:
and expand. The only thing I knew about it previously was the use of the Navajo language for secure radio correspondence and the use of Navajo people to translate it. That does not seem to be mentioned, but it is very notable.
224:
on the Navajo Code
Talkers. I don't think we should delete something where we see sources exist and the topic is encyclopedic, although I'm sympathetic with the idea of deleting. Unverified material can certainly be removed.
291:
I knew about this before reading the article, and it is wikilinked enough above that I won't rehash their arguments. Completely notable, worthwhile, educational and the reason we have encyclopedias.
86:
81:
143:
I've never heard anything about Native
Americans having any invlolvment in WWII, and I'm somewhat of a History Buff, so it's probably not very notable if I don't know about it.
90:
113:
73:
364:
77:
407:- a lot of the material here has to go, from the risk of copyvio if nothing else. I do hope that somebody cleans it up at some point, though.
159:
That's odd - because I'm no kind of WWII buff and I had heard of it; anything about WWII that even I have heard of must surely be notable. --
416:
398:
379:
354:
336:
317:
300:
283:
260:
234:
212:. So let's make it a stub. But a Google search shows that sources do exist -- in fact there are plenty of them out there, including
194:
168:
147:
134:
69:
61:
55:
17:
434:
52:
36:
433:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
164:
394:
375:
308:- Definitely should be kept. Wanting articles can be cleaned-up, but it's not a valid deletion argument.
331:
49:
120:
This page was created to pacify a disruptive editor who was adding large amounts of material to the
313:
296:
280:
256:
160:
121:
390:
371:
230:
190:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
412:
327:
213:
130:
350:
309:
208:
This has been around since July 2006 with only one incomprehensible footnote? Violates
144:
292:
276:
252:
226:
186:
178:
107:
408:
244:
209:
126:
273:
221:
346:
248:
182:
217:
325:
and send to cleanup. You haven't heard of the Navajo
Codetalkers?
427:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
403:
OK, I see where you are all coming from. Change vote to
103:
99:
95:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
437:). No further edits should be made to this page.
247:, or stubbed and add links to code talker and
365:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
363:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
70:Native Americans and World War II
62:Native Americans and World War II
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
417:17:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
399:08:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
380:08:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
355:02:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
337:00:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
318:00:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
301:22:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
284:22:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
261:21:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
235:21:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
195:21:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
169:21:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
148:20:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
135:18:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
56:05:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
454:
430:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
251:to the "see also."
122:House Made of Dawn
382:
368:
214:this bibliography
445:
432:
369:
359:
111:
93:
34:
453:
452:
448:
447:
446:
444:
443:
442:
441:
435:deletion review
428:
84:
68:
65:
50:Yamamoto Ichiro
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
451:
449:
440:
439:
422:
420:
419:
401:
383:
357:
339:
320:
303:
286:
263:
237:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
172:
171:
151:
150:
145:User:Radman622
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
450:
438:
436:
431:
425:
424:
423:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
400:
396:
392:
387:
384:
381:
377:
373:
366:
362:
358:
356:
352:
348:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
329:
324:
321:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
285:
282:
278:
274:
271:
267:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
241:
238:
236:
232:
228:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
203:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
175:
174:
173:
170:
166:
162:
161:Paularblaster
158:
155:
154:
153:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:
137:
136:
132:
128:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
429:
426:
421:
404:
391:Nick Dowling
385:
372:Nick Dowling
360:
341:
326:
322:
305:
288:
269:
265:
239:
220:excerpt and
205:
179:Code talkers
156:
140:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
328:Malinaccier
245:Code talker
141:Weak delete
270:in theatre
249:windtalker
183:Windtalker
310:matt91486
293:Pharmboy
277:Dhartung
253:LaMenta3
114:View log
227:Noroton
187:Noroton
157:comment
87:protect
82:history
409:Vizjim
272:alone.
127:Vizjim
91:delete
347:Bduke
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
413:talk
405:stub
395:talk
386:Keep
376:talk
361:Note
351:talk
342:Keep
332:talk
323:Keep
314:talk
306:Keep
297:talk
289:Keep
281:Talk
266:Keep
257:talk
240:Keep
231:talk
222:this
218:this
216:and
210:WP:V
206:Keep
191:talk
181:and
177:See
165:talk
131:talk
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
46:keep
367:.
112:β (
415:)
397:)
389:--
378:)
353:)
345:--
316:)
299:)
279:|
275:--
259:)
233:)
193:)
185:.
167:)
133:)
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
53:δΌθ©±
48:.
411:(
393:(
374:(
370:β
349:(
334:)
330:(
312:(
295:(
255:(
229:(
189:(
163:(
129:(
116:)
110:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.