201:— the references provided don't show any significant independent coverage, and I've failed to find anything else. The first two refs both seem to refer to the same original research paper (which admittedly, was published in a journal). The latter relate to the official website. Original article was a direct copy from the research paper (which would be a copyright violation) though this has since been slightly re-worded. Interesting to note the author's comments
217:
given it appears to have been written by the algorithm's author. Note that the article has previously been de-tagged for speedy deletion, and de-prodded, hence bringing to AFD since there's clearly some contention. (Though, for the record, I'm not particularly disagreeing that the article wasn't
166:
285:- an algorithm published in a minor journal less than two months ago will need a lot of evidence to be considered notable enough for its own article. This doesn't look like enough.
119:
209:
which appears to acknowledge a lack of coverage. I would suggest that the driver to write the article may have been promotional in nature, and at best this article is
336:
160:
302:
due to lack of notability. It was published in
November 2015. It fails notability until it has received "significant independent coverage".
126:
314:
need a
Knowledge article. Once it has become notable, feel free to re-add a article here (although it would be better if someone
17:
344:
181:
92:
87:
148:
248:
96:
389:
40:
310:
Yes, you cannot expect this from such a recent article, but that only shows that such a recent article does not
365:
323:
79:
340:
142:
385:
36:
305:
240:
57:
138:
360:
319:
290:
252:
174:
370:
359:
as there's nothing here to suggest a better notable article and my searches found nothing better.
348:
327:
294:
277:
230:
203:
The
Publication appeared at the end of November 2015, so one can not expect to be cited in a month
83:
61:
188:
272:
225:
210:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
384:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
75:
67:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53:
286:
244:
259:
214:
198:
154:
113:
378:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
213:
about a still emerging company / technology. There's a clear
265:
ed; any of whom may wish to contribute to this discussion.
218:
sufficiently promotional to merit deletion under CSD G11).
206:
109:
105:
101:
173:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
392:). No further edits should be made to this page.
337:list of Software-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
335:Note: This debate has been included in the
239:as nominator. As a courtesy, pinging author
334:
318:considered it to be worth doing so).
7:
24:
247:who tagged for speedy deletion,
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
251:who declined the speedy, and
62:01:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
371:01:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
349:20:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
328:20:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
295:20:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
278:20:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
231:20:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
409:
381:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
197:Doesn't appear to meet
249:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
215:conflict of interest
351:
341:Shawn in Montreal
400:
383:
368:
363:
309:
264:
258:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
48:The result was
34:
408:
407:
403:
402:
401:
399:
398:
397:
396:
390:deletion review
379:
366:
361:
303:
276:
268:
262:
256:
229:
221:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
406:
404:
395:
394:
374:
373:
362:SwisterTwister
353:
352:
331:
330:
320:HelpUsStopSpam
297:
280:
270:
266:
253:HelpUsStopSpam
223:
219:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
405:
393:
391:
387:
382:
376:
375:
372:
369:
364:
358:
355:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
333:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
307:
301:
298:
296:
292:
288:
284:
281:
279:
275:
274:
261:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
228:
227:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
380:
377:
356:
315:
311:
306:Nicoaraeradu
299:
282:
271:
241:Nicoaraeradu
236:
224:
202:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
316:independent
243:along with
161:free images
211:WP:TOOSOON
54:Malcolmxl5
386:talk page
287:Blythwood
245:Blythwood
207:this edit
37:talk page
388:or in a
120:View log
39:or in a
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
76:NewsInn
68:NewsInn
357:Delete
300:Delete
283:Delete
237:Delete
199:WP:GNG
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
367:talk
345:talk
324:talk
291:talk
273:talk
260:prod
255:who
226:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
312:yet
205:in
189:TWL
118:– (
347:)
339:.
326:)
293:)
263:}}
257:{{
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:--
343:(
322:(
308::
304:@
289:(
269:/
267:└
222:/
220:└
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.