Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Neal Ludevig - Knowledge

Source 📝

470:
Successful this person may be, but without meeting RS standards (i.e., something more than being tangentially mentioned in lots of articles on other subjects) it's a no-go. Curiously, the "strong keep" argument even acknowledges it's the project he is involved with that gets the press rather than the
374:
but it seems essential to make an article work about anyone whose life work is promoting, organizing, and supporting the works of other people. Ludevig is a promoter so we would not expect to find sources about him, but about the projects and people which he works with, and this is what we have.
403:
refbombing. I can't really find much outside of the Harlem Cultural Festival. Finally, while I understand your sentiments thats not a rationale in line with Knowledge policy. It's ok for someone to be good at their job or prominent in there field and not have an article even in a highly visible
379:
without the sex scandals and philanthropy - he is one of the most famous promoters in the world, yet he is not written about in books, is rarely interviewed in magazines, there are very few sources about him at all. But he is undeniably notable because of the success of the musicians he
433:
in some reliable sources but they are always very brief mentions in reports that are actually about the events he organized. That means he is a couple of degrees of separation away from personal notability, and this article is functioning as a
316:
Are you joking? Most top 40 recording artists don't have this much press. It is extremely hard to get noticed and notable in New York and this guy has done it over and over and over. This should not have been nominated for deletion at all.
398:
and therefore doesn't merit article. It's as simple as that. Some of the more reliable sources don't even mention him, the rest are passing mentions (usually quick quote, often with the other organizers). That's not a concern that
235:
article written in a promotional slant. Of the 50-odd references in this article, most are about the events he has helped organize (not Ludevig himself), passing mentions or non-independent (such as his linkedin profile).
335:
I'm dead serious. The "press" is almost entirely passing mentions, doesn't actually mention Ludevig or are non-reliable sources, like his personal LikenIn or bios on websites of organizations he is affiliated with (see
404:
scale. There are many researchers to academics, staffers to politicians, and high level executives in business who undoubtedly do a lot, but don't have articles because they don't meet our notability standards.
201: 394:
1) I wasn't worried about you given you aren't the creator of the article. There is, however, an almost certain connection between the article's creator and Ludevig himself. 2) Then he doesn't meet
536:
I'm not sure if a redirect is appropriate. He appears to have been one of at least 3 co-producers and it wasn't the actual Harlem Cultural Festival, but the 50th anniversary celebration. Best,
253: 273: 154: 195: 293: 101: 86: 161: 457: 127: 122: 131: 81: 74: 17: 216: 114: 183: 95: 91: 429:- Given the discussion above, this one is a close call but I must side with the nominator. Ludevig has indeed been 564: 40: 515: 472: 439: 349: 177: 453: 480: 385: 322: 173: 560: 545: 527: 505: 501: 484: 462: 413: 389: 365: 326: 305: 285: 265: 245: 56: 36: 118: 53: 223: 493: 471:
person--and that there is precisely why the projects, and not the person, are notable. Redirect to
435: 209: 110: 62: 444: 352:) yes but little on Ludevig himself. Also, given that this article is written like a glowing bio 370:
First - I disclaim any connection with the subject whatsoever. I understand your concerns about
442:, and there is no problem with mentioning Ludevig's behind-the-scenes work at that article. --- 523: 476: 381: 371: 337: 318: 232: 70: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
559:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
497: 345: 341: 356:
gives me concern that there has been coordination between Ludevig and the creating editor.
541: 409: 361: 301: 281: 261: 241: 189: 395: 519: 376: 148: 537: 405: 357: 297: 277: 257: 237: 353: 475:, or to Harlem Arts Festival if someone ever creates a page for it. 348:, some of the events that he has helped to organize (namely the 555:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
254:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
144: 140: 136: 208: 496:
and doesn't meet Knowledge minimum RS requirements.
274:
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 567:). No further edits should be made to this page. 292:Note: This discussion has been included in the 272:Note: This discussion has been included in the 252:Note: This discussion has been included in the 294:list of New York-related deletion discussions 222: 8: 438:. There is an article for the notable event 102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 291: 271: 251: 518:where he is mentioned as a co-producer - 354:and the subject himself has added a photo 7: 24: 87:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 546:04:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 528:03:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 506:15:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC) 485:22:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 463:15:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 57:14:42, 17 September 2019 (UTC) 1: 414:20:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 390:20:10, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 366:19:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 327:19:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 306:17:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 286:17:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 266:17:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 246:17:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 77:(AfD)? Read these primers! 584: 557:Please do not modify it. 516:Harlem Cultural Festival 473:Harlem Cultural Festival 440:Harlem Cultural Festival 375:Consider a subject like 350:Harlem Cultural Festival 32:Please do not modify it. 75:Articles for deletion 492:Tone is promotional 346:Significant coverage 344:search turned up no 494:personal promotion 436:personal promotion 448: 308: 288: 268: 92:Guide to deletion 82:How to contribute 54:Black Kite (talk) 575: 461: 446: 227: 226: 212: 164: 152: 134: 72: 34: 583: 582: 578: 577: 576: 574: 573: 572: 571: 565:deletion review 443: 169: 160: 125: 109: 106: 69: 66: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 581: 579: 570: 569: 551: 550: 549: 548: 531: 530: 508: 487: 465: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 330: 329: 310: 309: 289: 269: 230: 229: 166: 105: 104: 99: 89: 84: 67: 65: 60: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 580: 568: 566: 562: 558: 553: 552: 547: 543: 539: 535: 534: 533: 532: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 488: 486: 482: 478: 474: 469: 466: 464: 459: 455: 451: 450: 441: 437: 432: 428: 425: 424: 415: 411: 407: 402: 397: 393: 392: 391: 387: 383: 378: 373: 369: 368: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 334: 333: 332: 331: 328: 324: 320: 315: 312: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 290: 287: 283: 279: 275: 270: 267: 263: 259: 255: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 234: 225: 221: 218: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 175: 172: 171:Find sources: 167: 163: 159: 156: 150: 146: 142: 138: 133: 129: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 103: 100: 97: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 79: 78: 76: 71: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 556: 554: 511: 489: 477:ShelbyMarion 467: 445: 430: 426: 400: 382:Luke Kindred 377:David Geffen 319:Luke Kindred 313: 233:WP:REFBOMBed 231: 219: 213: 205: 198: 192: 186: 180: 170: 157: 111:Neal Ludevig 68: 63:Neal Ludevig 49: 47: 31: 28: 498:Limpbreaker 314:STRONG KEEP 196:free images 447:DOOMSDAYER 372:WP:REFBOMB 338:WP:REFBOMB 561:talk page 510:Possible 431:mentioned 380:promoted. 342:WP:BEFORE 37:talk page 563:or in a 512:Redirect 458:Contribs 155:View log 96:glossary 39:or in a 520:Epinoia 202:WP refs 190:scholar 128:protect 123:history 73:New to 490:Delete 468:Delete 427:Delete 396:WP:GNG 340:). My 174:Google 132:delete 50:delete 538:GPL93 406:GPL93 358:GPL93 317:Keep. 298:GPL93 278:GPL93 258:GPL93 238:GPL93 217:JSTOR 178:books 162:Stats 149:views 141:watch 137:links 16:< 542:talk 524:talk 502:talk 481:talk 454:Talk 410:talk 386:talk 362:talk 323:talk 302:talk 282:talk 262:talk 242:talk 210:FENS 184:news 145:logs 119:talk 115:edit 514:to 449:520 224:TWL 153:– ( 544:) 526:) 504:) 483:) 412:) 401:is 388:) 364:) 325:) 304:) 296:. 284:) 276:. 264:) 256:. 244:) 204:) 147:| 143:| 139:| 135:| 130:| 126:| 121:| 117:| 52:. 540:( 522:( 500:( 479:( 460:) 456:| 452:( 408:( 384:( 360:( 321:( 300:( 280:( 260:( 240:( 228:) 220:· 214:· 206:· 199:· 193:· 187:· 181:· 176:( 168:( 165:) 158:· 151:) 113:( 98:) 94:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Black Kite (talk)
14:42, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Neal Ludevig

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Neal Ludevig
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.