342:
be done. I've removed the unsourced BLP material and added a "Further
Reading" section that includes links to the Boston Globe article and one of the Huffington Post articles. In finding this material, I also ran across an Associated Press report on the state Supreme Court ruling (but neglected to
391:
Thanks for the name of the case (the articles I read didn't seem to mention it). I created a new article under the case name, using what little relevant information existed in the instant article, along with the links I described above. I'll be striking my "keep" and changing it to a "redirect".
332:
I agree with
Bearcat -- an article about the case might be more appropriate than an article about the plaintiff. But right now, there is no article on the case (otherwise, I would have proposed a "redirect" instead of a "keep"). As to sourcing, there is some stuff out there. The
337:
did an in-depth piece back in 2011 and the
Huffington Post has been writing articles on the case (including articles about the lower court decisions). It's a pity that whoever created this article didn't do a better job of it, but a better job
170:
265:
123:
164:
287:
365:
343:
add that to the article). In all, the instant article can be expanded and, if necessary, renamed (so as to be about the case, and not the person).
130:
96:
91:
204:, parked on a single source, of a person notable primarily for her involvement in a state Supreme Court case. An article about the
100:
17:
83:
185:
152:
461:
40:
438:
397:
348:
146:
442:
415:
401:
382:
352:
321:
301:
279:
257:
142:
65:
457:
36:
374:
229:
192:
434:
393:
344:
317:
178:
406:
Thanks for that. I'm accordingly going to withdraw this nomination and go straight to a redirect.
291:
269:
87:
411:
253:
61:
48:
The result was an article now exists about the court case, props to NewYorkActuary, so I'm
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
456:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
158:
369:
201:
53:
430:
313:
296:
274:
209:
79:
71:
407:
249:
57:
117:
52:
this nomination and redirecting the BLP to it in accordance with
450:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
366:
Gay & Lesbian
Advocates & Defenders#Notable cases
266:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
232:-violating and completely unsourced statements about her
368:
until she passes a notability guideline in the future.--
113:
109:
105:
177:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
464:). No further edits should be made to this page.
208:would likely be justified — but a standalone
191:
8:
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
264:Note: This debate has been included in the
240:, without prejudice against creation of an
288:list of Maine-related deletion discussions
285:
263:
236:life to get it beyond two sentences.
7:
224:topic from the event. And that's
24:
364:(new article) or to the entry at
228:true if you have to delve into
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
443:00:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
416:19:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
402:00:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
383:20:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
353:19:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
322:22:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
302:05:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
280:05:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
258:01:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
66:19:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
481:
453:Please do not modify it.
220:, is not warranted as a
32:Please do not modify it.
244:article about the
304:
282:
472:
455:
380:
372:
299:
294:
277:
272:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
480:
479:
475:
474:
473:
471:
470:
469:
468:
462:deletion review
451:
375:
370:
358:rename/redirect
297:
292:
275:
270:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
478:
476:
467:
466:
446:
445:
435:NewYorkActuary
431:Doe v. Clenchy
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
394:NewYorkActuary
386:
385:
362:Doe v. Clenchy
355:
345:NewYorkActuary
324:
306:
305:
283:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
477:
465:
463:
459:
454:
448:
447:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
425:
424:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:
403:
399:
395:
390:
389:
388:
387:
384:
381:
379:
373:
367:
363:
359:
356:
354:
350:
346:
341:
336:
331:
329:
325:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
307:
303:
300:
295:
289:
284:
281:
278:
273:
267:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:Nicole Maines
77:
76:
73:
72:Nicole Maines
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
452:
449:
426:
377:
371:☾Loriendrew☽
361:
357:
339:
335:Boston Globe
334:
327:
326:
312:, as above.
309:
245:
241:
237:
233:
225:
221:
217:
213:
205:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
378:(ring-ring)
165:free images
50:withdrawing
226:especially
458:talk page
314:Blythwood
37:talk page
460:or in a
427:Redirect
234:personal
222:separate
202:WP:BLP1E
124:View log
54:WP:BLP1E
39:or in a
408:Bearcat
250:Bearcat
230:privacy
216:, as a
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
58:Bearcat
310:Delete
248:case.
238:Delete
218:person
210:WP:BLP
143:Google
101:delete
246:court
242:event
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
439:talk
412:talk
398:talk
349:talk
328:Keep
318:talk
254:talk
206:case
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
433:.
429:to
360:to
340:can
293:sst
271:sst
214:her
212:of
193:TWL
122:– (
441:)
414:)
400:)
351:)
320:)
290:.
268:.
256:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:.
437:(
410:(
396:(
376:☏
347:(
330:.
316:(
298:✈
276:✈
252:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.