Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/SCAB computer - Knowledge

Source 📝

313:
by nominator: What if there was an article so obscure that no-one ever read it? Could this be it? A little feedback would be helpful here...how else are we going to keep the belly button lint and toenail cippings from building up in the dark corners of the Knowledge?
378:- I think that if the silence was a sign that the community was shocked that this article was nominated, then I would have found more Ghits. Oh well...we've got room for Pokemons and individual sizes of flashlight batteries, resources are free, right? -- 395:- There is silence, since I thought it is already obvious that this should be deleted... No third-party reliable sources. Everything is based on a single self-published web page. Not notable and not even verifiable. — 155: 110: 149: 337: 115: 186:
Non-notable private academic project, no publications, no relevant hits on Google Books, subject overlaps device for classifying apples
83: 78: 87: 17: 70: 170: 137: 244: 217: 419: 36: 418:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
131: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
404: 387: 370: 352: 323: 304: 268: 248: 221: 195: 127: 52: 383: 319: 240: 213: 191: 74: 177: 163: 66: 58: 348: 287: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
379: 315: 278: 231: 187: 143: 366: 264: 400: 344: 104: 212:; the concept is noteworthy as an example of either, if not as its own thing. 362: 260: 49: 396: 361:- What does near silence indicate? Great notability or great obscurity? 281:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
234:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
412:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
209: 205: 100: 96: 92: 162: 286:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 239:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 422:). No further edits should be made to this page. 338:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 176: 8: 332: 336:: This debate has been included in the 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 259:- No evidence of notability. 222:01:51, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 196:01:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 405:14:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 388:14:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 371:05:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 353:23:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 324:22:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 305:22:24, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 53:04:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 269:15:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 249:01:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 439: 415:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 355: 341: 307: 251: 430: 417: 342: 302: 285: 283: 241:Timotheus Canens 238: 236: 214:Edward Vielmetti 181: 180: 166: 118: 108: 90: 34: 438: 437: 433: 432: 431: 429: 428: 427: 426: 420:deletion review 413: 298: 294: 288: 276: 229: 123: 114: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 436: 434: 425: 424: 408: 407: 390: 373: 356: 329: 328: 327: 326: 296: 292: 284: 273: 272: 271: 253: 252: 237: 226: 225: 224: 184: 183: 120: 116:AfD statistics 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 435: 423: 421: 416: 410: 409: 406: 402: 398: 394: 391: 389: 385: 381: 377: 374: 372: 368: 364: 360: 357: 354: 350: 346: 339: 335: 331: 330: 325: 321: 317: 312: 309: 308: 306: 303: 301: 300: 299: 282: 280: 275: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 255: 254: 250: 246: 242: 235: 233: 228: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200: 199: 198: 197: 193: 189: 179: 175: 172: 169: 165: 161: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 129: 126: 125:Find sources: 121: 117: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67:SCAB computer 64: 63: 60: 59:SCAB computer 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 414: 411: 392: 375: 358: 333: 310: 291: 290: 289: 277: 256: 230: 201: 185: 173: 167: 159: 152: 146: 140: 134: 124: 45: 43: 31: 28: 380:Wtshymanski 316:Wtshymanski 188:Wtshymanski 150:free images 295:rbitrarily 345:• Gene93k 279:Relisted 232:Relisted 111:View log 376:Comment 359:Comment 311:Comment 156:WP refs 144:scholar 84:protect 79:history 393:Delete 257:Delete 128:Google 88:delete 50:Jayjg 46:delete 363:Rilak 261:Rilak 204:into 202:Merge 171:JSTOR 132:books 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 401:talk 397:Miym 384:talk 367:talk 349:talk 334:Note 320:talk 265:talk 245:talk 218:talk 210:OISC 206:RISC 192:talk 164:FENS 138:news 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 343:-- 208:or 178:TWL 113:• 109:– ( 403:) 386:) 369:) 351:) 340:. 322:) 314:-- 267:) 247:) 220:) 194:) 158:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 399:( 382:( 365:( 347:( 318:( 297:0 293:A 263:( 243:( 216:( 190:( 182:) 174:· 168:· 160:· 153:· 147:· 141:· 135:· 130:( 122:( 119:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Jayjg
04:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
SCAB computer
SCAB computer
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Wtshymanski
talk
01:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
RISC

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.