487:. While AUUF can perhaps claim independent notability, the article really fails to convey that. Instead, the article was created to rehash the national headlines the congregation received once upon a time for about five minutes, over a practice which they had customarily carried out for decades anyway. And there the article continues to sit in essentially that same state, nearly five years later. Bet that if I AfD'ed it, "a mob" would show up to defend the article from deletion, yet these same editors wouldn't lift a finger to actually improve the article. Seen it with too many AfDs already.
64:. But that is a guideline, not a hard-and-fast policy. The verifiability requirements are met, and with a significant portion of the participants arguing that the recurring nature of subject, as documented by Arxiloxos, is sufficiently enduring, I have no choice but to declare that there is no consensus here.
721:
Passes the WP:GNG and WP:N. WP:GNG does not discriminate based on the nature of the topic. It is the
Seattle Times, the Washington Post, National Public Radio, etc., that identify this topic as being worthy of attention. The other issue is whether or not the topic fails WP:NOT. As far as it being
755:
Already tried. I couldn't find anything available under the appropriate license. I haven't heard anything about its current status, but it's been a number of years since I've had any reason to fly or drive to
Anchorage on the spur of the moment in the middle of winter. Therefore, if they're still
474:
1) Re: nom's mention of BLP concerns - as was previously mentioned on the talk page, Google Street View clean avoids that whole block. Never mind that it's not really so hard to find the damn thing anyway (two blocks away from where I lived for much of the 1990s), which revists the question "If the
475:
real information is elsewhere, then what do I need
Knowledge for?" that I've asked too many times and have yet to receive a satisfactory answer for. 2) I would presume lasting significance to be one of the measuring sticks for an article to remain a part of the encyclopedia. Billy Ray Powers
635:- Can you clarify your statement? The sources meet reliability, or are you claiming that publications like the Washington Post and Seattle Times are unreliable? The sources meet significant coverage being the main topic of these articles or are claiming that the
756:
building it, I need a better reason to go there than just to get a photo. Since much of nothing has been spoken of its current status, it may require something approaching real work to figure things out should I happen to have reason/opportunity to travel there.
483:, Powers received all of 133 votes (0.23%) out of over 58,000 cast for his trouble. Not what I would consider lasting significance. Now, as for Bwilkins's comment, compare this with another Anchorage-related article, that of the
722:
indiscriminate info, I don't see any complaints here that we already have too many articles about
Alaskan artwork that has attracted sufficient attention over a period of years so as to be declared a public nuisance.
535:
349:, which I quote here: "As silly as it is, this snowman has garnered notoriety, and has been covered in press beyond its own locality of Anchorage, and that coverage has been sustained over multiple years. See
195:
56:, for this is mostly a "fun news" story, albeit one that has been recurring for a few years. This argument has a great deal of merit, and indeed my personal view is that the subject does not pass the
94:
380:. It's unfortunate that no one added these sources to the article after the first AfD closed, but the coverage exists, and has been extensive, recurring, and not merely regional. --
398:
148:
453:. A big snowman that gets mentioned as the "joke/light" news elsewhere is not worthy, and serves to demean the residents of the community rather than be a serious article (
664:
which could use some more examples of large snowmen. The
Guinness Book of Records tracks this and the previous record holder, Angus, had the following impressive stats:
546:
189:
553:
as well. This isn't a hoax and I'm not seeing evidence of a violation of BLP or that this article is being used a coatrack to demean the community's residents.
422:
155:
484:
778:
All the sources
Arxiloxos listed, except perhaps for the Charlotte Observer (which 404s), are in-depth and reliable, and as a result any two would reach
510:
346:
89:
480:
542:
232:
No reliable sources. No claim to notability. BLP concern related to Billy Powers. At best a local news item in a small town, if it is not a hoax.
284:
a giant snowman in the desert and doused it in gasoline and set it on fire while thousands of people had a big party around it every year
549:
would seem to be based on the story. As
Arxiloxos has shown, coverage is persistent and has geographical scope, making this meet
476:
623:
17:
366:
561:
462:
813:
792:
768:
750:
731:
712:
648:
627:
591:
563:
522:
499:
466:
438:
414:
389:
337:
320:
295:
268:
242:
73:
121:
116:
210:
125:
636:
358:
177:
261:
108:
832:
727:
40:
786:, but continuing coverage over years, and geographical scope are evidenced by that range of sources as well. --
708:
539:
362:
426:
402:
238:
370:
171:
828:
374:
333:
254:
234:
36:
741:
Suggestion to improve article: add photos of
Snowzilla. It would add to the credibility of the topic.--
278:
OK, we have a an article about A BIG SNOWMAN IN SOMEONE'S YARD???? Look, even if this showed up on teh
167:
790:
723:
283:
354:
763:
742:
704:
620:
494:
385:
203:
68:
807:
746:
559:
454:
217:
378:
316:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
827:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
311:
this does not have lasting effect and there is no depth of coverate or
Geographical scope. -
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
573:
329:
291:
787:
783:
550:
308:
57:
661:
757:
644:
617:
518:
488:
381:
227:
183:
112:
65:
802:
779:
612:
554:
531:
458:
450:
53:
608:
585:
312:
142:
604:
304:
287:
576:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
640:
514:
104:
79:
282:
show during the weather segment, it isn't notable. Maybe if someone built
350:
800:
Can't say I'm impressed with the article, but it meets the guidelines.--
477:
ran for mayor of
Anchorage in response to all the publicity he received
60:
criteria, for I think a stories like this fall into the category of
821:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
62:"stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories,"
307:
guide lines and is really not fit for inclusion. As per
138:
134:
130:
683:
6 ft. of chicken wire & muslin for the carrot nose
202:
52:. The most relevant argument for deletion is probably
583:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
399:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
835:). No further edits should be made to this page.
230:(previous AFD exists) Reason given in PROD was:
95:Articles for deletion/Snowzilla (2nd nomination)
216:
8:
421:Note: This debate has been included in the
397:Note: This debate has been included in the
485:Anchorage Unitarian Universalist Fellowship
423:list of Alaska-related deletion discussions
782:. I'm suspicious of the applicability of
420:
396:
511:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Snowzilla
615:requirements, and it is just a snowman.
345:. For the reason stated by Whpq in the
87:
286:, then it might be notable. Not this.
251:as prodder. Do we have any standards?
639:is actually about something else? --
7:
86:
671:Height 113 ft. & 7 inches tall
24:
695:3 skidder tires for the buttons
686:6 automobile tires as the mouth
662:Snowman#World's largest snowman
90:Articles for deletion/Snowzilla
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
814:04:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
793:05:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
769:07:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
751:06:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
732:02:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
713:08:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
649:04:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
628:02:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
592:00:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
564:23:01, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
523:19:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
500:05:34, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
467:11:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
439:10:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
415:10:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
390:23:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
373:." And we can add this 2008
367:Charlotte Observer, Dec 2008
338:21:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
321:18:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
296:17:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
269:17:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
243:17:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
74:06:23, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
449:An absolute failure on the
852:
677:200,000 cubic feet of snow
698:2 – 10 ft. trees for arms
371:Alaska Dispatch, Dec 2009
359:Washington Post, Jan 2007
355:Anchorage Daily, dec 2006
824:Please do not modify it.
603:This article appears to
32:Please do not modify it.
363:Seattle Times, Dec 2008
328:as per above comments.
680:4 ft. wreathes as eyes
85:AfDs for this article:
375:National Public Radio
692:120 ft. fleece scarf
613:significant coverage
547:this children's book
534:through coverage in
765:Talk to me, Billy
509:- My opinion from
496:Talk to me, Billy
48:The result was
689:20 ft. fleece hat
594:
513:still stands. --
441:
417:
267:
226:Removed PROD per
71:
843:
826:
812:
766:
760:
626:
609:reliable sources
588:
582:
578:
557:
497:
491:
451:notability scale
435:
432:
429:
411:
408:
405:
266:
264:
259:
252:
221:
220:
206:
158:
146:
128:
69:
34:
851:
850:
846:
845:
844:
842:
841:
840:
839:
833:deletion review
822:
801:
764:
758:
724:Unscintillating
616:
586:
571:
555:
495:
489:
433:
430:
427:
409:
406:
403:
262:
255:
253:
163:
154:
119:
103:
100:
83:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
849:
847:
838:
837:
817:
816:
795:
773:
772:
771:
735:
734:
702:
701:
700:
699:
696:
693:
690:
687:
684:
681:
678:
675:
672:
666:
665:
654:
653:
652:
651:
637:Alaska Snowman
597:
596:
595:
580:
579:
568:
567:
566:
525:
503:
502:
481:As viewed here
469:
443:
442:
418:
393:
392:
351:MSNBC Dec 2005
340:
323:
298:
272:
271:
224:
223:
160:
99:
98:
97:
92:
84:
82:
77:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
848:
836:
834:
830:
825:
819:
818:
815:
811:
809:
804:
799:
796:
794:
791:
789:
785:
781:
777:
774:
770:
767:
761:
754:
753:
752:
748:
744:
740:
737:
736:
733:
729:
725:
720:
717:
716:
715:
714:
710:
706:
697:
694:
691:
688:
685:
682:
679:
676:
674:9,000,000 lbs
673:
670:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
656:
655:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
631:
630:
629:
625:
622:
619:
614:
610:
606:
602:
599:
598:
593:
590:
589:
581:
577:
575:
570:
569:
565:
562:
560:
558:
552:
548:
544:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
504:
501:
498:
492:
486:
482:
478:
473:
470:
468:
464:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:Strong delete
445:
444:
440:
436:
424:
419:
416:
412:
400:
395:
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
273:
270:
265:
260:
258:
250:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
235:Illia Connell
233:
229:
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
157:
153:
150:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
123:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:
96:
93:
91:
88:
81:
78:
76:
75:
72:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
823:
820:
805:
797:
775:
738:
718:
703:
657:
632:
600:
584:
572:
527:
506:
471:
457:
446:
434:PEANUTBUTTER
410:PEANUTBUTTER
342:
325:
300:
279:
275:
256:
248:
231:
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
151:
61:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
605:non-notable
330:FrigidNinja
190:free images
54:WP:NOT#NEWS
788:j⚛e decker
759:RadioKAOS
490:RadioKAOS
305:notability
263:.Wolfowitz
829:talk page
545:. Also,
382:Arxiloxos
347:first AfD
105:Snowzilla
80:Snowzilla
66:Sjakkalle
37:talk page
831:or in a
803:Kubigula
784:WP:EVENT
743:Jvanek01
574:Relisted
556:Gobōnobō
551:WP:EVENT
543:articles
530:. Meets
459:BWilkins
309:WP:EVENT
303:- Fails
149:View log
70:(Check!)
58:WP:EVENT
39:or in a
739:Neutral
633:Comment
587:MBisanz
472:Comment
313:Pmedema
228:WP:PROD
196:WP refs
184:scholar
122:protect
117:history
780:WP:GNG
705:Warden
601:Delete
532:WP:GNG
377:report
326:Delete
301:Delete
288:Mangoe
276:delete
257:Kiefer
249:Delete
168:Google
126:delete
660:into
658:Merge
536:books
425:. ★☆
401:. ★☆
280:Today
211:JSTOR
172:books
156:Stats
143:views
135:watch
131:links
16:<
808:talk
798:Keep
776:Keep
747:talk
728:talk
719:Keep
709:talk
645:talk
641:Whpq
611:for
540:news
538:and
528:Keep
519:talk
515:Whpq
507:Keep
428:DUCK
404:DUCK
386:talk
343:Keep
334:talk
317:talk
292:talk
239:talk
204:FENS
178:news
139:logs
113:talk
109:edit
624:ley
621:and
618:TBr
607:in
479:.
437:☆★
413:☆★
218:TWL
147:– (
762:–
749:)
730:)
711:)
647:)
521:)
493:–
465:)
463:←✎
455:✉→
431:IS
407:IS
388:)
369:,
365:,
361:,
357:,
353:,
336:)
319:)
294:)
241:)
198:)
141:|
137:|
133:|
129:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
810:)
806:(
745:(
726:(
707:(
643:(
517:(
384:(
332:(
315:(
290:(
237:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
152:·
145:)
107:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.