Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Societas Via Romana - Knowledge

Source 📝

173:
measure of importance). Claimed membership numbers when you don't charge a membership fee aren't going to impress either. What this society would need to persuade me is a significant number of members, or a significant profile in the community (re-enactments, educational work, regular film extra work, etc). It might be my laziness or an unclear layout of their webpage, but on a quick look I didn't see anything that describes such real world activities. So, if it is in practice no more than an online talking shop,
187:
geography dump is superior to the largest website. Micronations, to me, have notability that is extremely difficult to establish, almost impossible to verify. I have no feelings whatsoever on the worthiness of this micronation vs. that, no judgment on whether they are as notable as they are loved. To the degree that a micronation establishes notability in an empirical way, I can vote to keep. In this case, I cannot get that notability and must vote delete.
425:. The one who put it up for deletion purely seems to have purely done so out of spite. Secondly, it is not the only article I have written or contributed to, so, I can't be accused of using it as self-promotion... Please don't be too dismissive in your scepticism, people. I wonder if some of you even bothered to read the page at all... 466:
stuff that is allowed to stay in Knowledge, SVR looks a bit more noteworthy. {eg. I like the Beatles...but Hey Jude is NOT and NEVER will be encyclopedia material. So, even though my vote change will not be enough to help keep this article from deletion, I will change since they ought to have someone on their side.
362:, indicates in no uncertain terms the nature of Societas Via Romana - ie that it is a web-based micronation. As it was therefore non-notable, I nominated it for deletion in exactly the same way that I have done for articles on numerous other unverifiable, non-notable web-based micronations. In a fit of pique, 330:
micronation article. Belgsoc is as strong in his or her opinion as you are in yours, and that is a terrible distraction for you. In the end, when you saw that Belgsoc did an edit on this article, you decided to have some personal revenge and put it up for deletion. But you did not count on Belgsoc
226:
Delete. I have visited the website of this group a few times. They are not a bad bunch, and they at least do not presume to be a micronation. {Poole's description of them as a "micronation club" is inaccurate in this respect. The article here flat out denies micronation status}. Still, I have to
186:
Delete: As said above, micronations survive VfD over and over. Well, the only thing that I think I can offer is consistency. I keep, as much as possible, criteria that do not change with my feelings. I feel that real life always takes precedence over fiction, that the smallest town in our infamous
172:
I don't believe that claiming 'micronation' status makes you notable (so don't think describing micronation aims are going to impress me), or that getting articles in newspapers written about you are (I've read enough newspaper articles about complete oddballs and silly stories to not rate this as a
135:
Oh, I agree. If I was Emperor of Knowledge, internet micronations would be one of several classes of articles we would manage without. But we are a cooperative community, and the community seems to want them to survive. That being the case, I don't see this one as any worse than the others. OTOH, if
321:
Let's see...on the micronation discussion page, you argue that Nova Roma is a micronation and will continue to refer to it as such because that is what the Nova Roma webpage says it is. Ok. But when SVR denies being a micronation, you ignore that and insist it must be. I see. The real criterion
465:
I previously voted for deletion, but I am changing my vote. I think Stormie is right and this whole affair is a personal quarrel between Cruickshank and Belgsoc. And it is not fair that the SVR gets its article deleted because of being in the crossfire. When I see some of the really insignicant
237:
They can deny being a micronation all they like - but the facts - and their own actions - speak for themselves. This internet-based entity was created by a group of disgruntled former members of the Nova Roma micronation, with the specific intention of setting themselves up in opposition to the
524:
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.
326:
And according to the edit page, Belgsoc did not even create the article! You know what I think Gene? I think you would have ignored this Societas Via Romana article were it not for Belgsoc tamp ering with your beloved
309:
I see this inaccuracy has been corrected now). Like some other users here say, the matter appears to be revolving around tricking people into believing your POV rather than the actual facts. I find this very
421:
Obviously you won't find me very objective because I created the article, but in my defence, I would like to point out the following facts: the Societas Via Romana is a serious organisation and is
227:
agree this club is not notable and it's small size and lack of achivements {beyond being a pleasant place for Roman buffs to associate} make it inappropriate for a reference encyclopedia.
42:
Article created by editor who apparently has an axe to grind concerning another similar group and whose only other contributions involve vandalism of parts of the
279:
is a crank who has repeatedly posted irrelevent off-topic statements as a way of attempting to villify another editor. Admins please note this latest example. --
350:- an editor who has been around for 1 entire week, and contributed to 2 entire articles -(and who has been strangely inactive since then) had not attempted to 33:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was
322:
here is Gene Poole's POV! If Gene Poole says something is a micronation, then it is. And if he says something is not a micronation, then it is not.
64:, who is a self-declared disgruntled former member of Nova Roma - an older, larger group that Societas Via Romana competes with - and whose edits ( 56:
Non-notable micronation status of this group is strongly indicated by repeated attempts at interpolating references to Societas Via Romana into the
88:. Neither obviously better nor worse than the other micronation articles, which have repeatedly survived VfDing. The problem here seems to be that 449:
Gene Poole listed it on VFD, Belgsoc removed the VFD listing, I don't really care if they're officially associated with your society or not. —
17: 97: 114:
is not the only one with a dispute over Gene's actions; I also do not feel that Gene acts in a reasonable manner.
238:
former group. The editor who created this article has also attempted to delete references to Nova Roma in the
370:
for deletion. That attempt will fail this time, just like it failed the previous 2 times it was tried - and
195: 69: 26: 406: 374:, like all other Wiki self-promoters, will (indeed, already has) disappeared from whence he/she came. -- 178: 467: 332: 229: 298: 396: 96:
seem to have it in for each other and are VfDing each other's clubs. Maybe what is really needed is
403: 367: 371: 363: 347: 111: 93: 61: 29:
was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion.
155: 507: 302: 331:
putting your Atlantium article up for VfD, did you? Isn't this whole matter rather petty?
485: 375: 280: 251: 219: 209: 89: 77: 49: 496: 443: 418: 141: 101: 517: 474: 450: 432: 431:, not notable, let emperors Gene Poole and Belgsoc go and fight it out elsewhere. — 386: 66:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=Belgsoc
481: 353: 276: 260: 259:
As an aside, "Gene Poole" is really George Cruickshank, "Emperor" of Atlantium.
239: 188: 154:. Another small, completely non-notable hobby club/website/discussion group. -- 129: 115: 73: 57: 43: 385:
I don't care if it calls itself a "micronation" or a blog if it's nonnotable.
305:) did not attempt to replace references to Nova Roma with Societas Via Romana ( 164: 480:
Delete yet another vanity article on a micronation based on ancient Rome. --
202: 246:- which would appear to be rather odd behaviour for a group that claims to 65: 40:
Non-notable semi-fictitious internet-based micronation club.
218:
Non-notable. Non-encyclopedic. Seems like an advertisement.
140:
internet micronation articles I would vote for deletion.
163:
Delete. Not notable, even by micronation "standards". -
402:
Delete, for a multitude of reasons already presented.
244:
and replace it with references to Societas Via Romana
442:But neither user is associated with that org! 8: 46:article that relate to the competing group. 346:about the Societas Via Romana article if 7: 128:. Looks like self-promotion to me. 352:repeatedly interpolate it into the 24: 506:How did I miss this one? Delete. 68:) are limited almost entirely to 208:Wholly agree w/ Geogre. Delete. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 495:It is not a micronation. Uh. 342:think? I would not have even 527:Please do not edit this page 98:Knowledge:Dispute resolution 31:This page is no longer live. 543: 446:11:37, Aug 14, 2004 (CET) 52:02:18, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 499:11:57, Aug 16, 2004 (CET) 453:06:46, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC) 435:02:14, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC) 378:02:22, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) 335:01:26, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) 254:00:09, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) 222:03:42, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC) 132:07:02, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 520:20:32, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC) 510:10:06, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC) 488:03:28, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC) 477:20:39, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC) 470:16:51, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC) 411:01:53, 2004 Aug 13 (UTC) 399:16:09, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) 389:05:09, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) 283:00:55, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) 263:00:32, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) 232:12:53, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC) 212:02:34, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC) 205:17:19, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 198:14:27, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 191:13:04, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 181:12:33, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 167:07:33, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 158:07:23, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 144:07:41, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 118:06:59, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 104:06:54, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC) 80:12:28, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC) 136:the vote was to delete 250:be a micronation. -- 194:Delete. Nonnotable. 368:Empire of Atlantium 70:Societas Via Romana 27:Societas Via Romana 301:flat out lies. I ( 228: 196:Wile E. Heresiarch 47: 423:not a micronation 225: 41: 534: 409: 179:Average Earthman 542: 541: 537: 536: 535: 533: 532: 531: 407: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 540: 538: 522: 521: 511: 503: 502: 501: 500: 490: 489: 478: 471: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 437: 436: 426: 412: 400: 390: 338:You know what 324: 323: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 234: 233: 223: 213: 206: 199: 192: 183: 182: 169: 168: 160: 159: 148: 147: 146: 145: 122: 121: 120: 119: 106: 105: 82: 81: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 539: 530: 528: 519: 515: 512: 509: 505: 504: 498: 494: 493: 492: 491: 487: 483: 479: 476: 472: 469: 464: 461: 460: 452: 448: 447: 445: 441: 440: 439: 438: 434: 430: 427: 424: 420: 416: 413: 410: 405: 401: 398: 394: 391: 388: 384: 381: 380: 379: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 355: 349: 345: 341: 336: 334: 328: 320: 319: 308: 304: 300: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 282: 278: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 270: 262: 258: 257: 256: 255: 253: 249: 245: 241: 236: 235: 231: 224: 221: 217: 214: 211: 207: 204: 200: 197: 193: 190: 185: 184: 180: 176: 171: 170: 166: 162: 161: 157: 156:Robert Merkel 153: 150: 149: 143: 139: 134: 133: 131: 127: 124: 123: 117: 113: 110: 109: 108: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 84: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 54: 53: 51: 45: 38: 36: 32: 28: 19: 526: 523: 513: 468:Stuart Smith 462: 428: 422: 414: 392: 382: 366:then listed 359: 351: 343: 339: 337: 333:Stuart Smith 329: 325: 306: 247: 243: 230:Stuart Smith 215: 174: 151: 137: 125: 85: 60:article, by 39: 34: 30: 25: 354:Micronation 240:Micronation 165:Sean Curtin 74:Micronation 58:Micronation 44:Micronation 376:Gene_poole 299:Gene_poole 281:Gene_poole 252:Gene_poole 210:Lacrimosus 201:Delete. -- 90:Gene_poole 78:Gene_poole 50:Gene_poole 497:Captain_Q 444:Captain_Q 419:Captain_Q 397:Fire Star 358:- which, 303:Captain_Q 242:article, 142:Securiger 102:Securiger 35:to delete 518:UtherSRG 475:Dittaeva 473:Keep. -- 360:I repeat 310:petty... 451:Stormie 433:Stormie 387:Postdlf 383:Delete. 372:Belgsoc 364:Belgsoc 356:article 348:Belgsoc 216:Delete. 112:Belgsoc 94:Belgsoc 62:Belgsoc 514:Delete 482:Cyrius 429:Delete 393:Delete 277:Samboy 261:Samboy 220:Skyler 189:Geogre 175:delete 152:Delete 130:Samboy 126:Delete 116:Samboy 404:Denni 344:known 307:edit: 16:< 516:. - 508:Ambi 463:Keep 415:Keep 203:Ianb 92:and 86:Keep 72:and 248:not 138:all 529:. 417:. 395:. 177:. 100:? 76:-- 48:-- 37:. 486:✎ 484:| 408:☯ 340:I

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
Societas Via Romana
Micronation
Gene_poole
Micronation
Belgsoc
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=Belgsoc
Societas Via Romana
Micronation
Gene_poole
Gene_poole
Belgsoc
Knowledge:Dispute resolution
Securiger
Belgsoc
Samboy
Samboy
Securiger
Robert Merkel
Sean Curtin
Average Earthman
Geogre
Wile E. Heresiarch
Ianb
Lacrimosus
Skyler
Stuart Smith
Micronation
Gene_poole
Samboy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.