555:- She appears to be an up and coming actor, so no prejudice to recreation in the future as her career develops. However, at this point, she has basically got supporting parts in multiple TV series, but without any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The ones in the article are insufficient. Coverage is insubstantial, with the best of it being coverage of a the casting decision for Once Upon a Time. These are simply short annoucnements of the casting. My own search for significant coverage turned up nothing. I'm prepared to change my mind if those asserting obvious notability can provide sources to back up the claim. --
710:, etc.). (4) The reference are intellectually independent rather than just mirrors on different sites. (5) With the exception of the Twitter post, all the sources are apparently independent (not published by people other than Martin-Green or a concerning conflict of interest). And I know some might find page views entirely irrelevant, I think it's worth mentioning as just one element in a detailed analysis. The Sonequa Martin-Green article has over 41,000 page view over the last month. --
671:
most definitely does not exclude which other articles exist from the discussion. In fact, that essay (not a policy) explicitly states that the comparisons to other existing articles "may form part of a cogent argument". But it states that such comparisons should not alone be the basis for an AfD
685:
was cited in favor of deletion, but the text of the actual policy strongly favors keeping the article. Breaking down by elements. (1) There are multiple sources (12 including references and links). (2) All but one (the
Twitter post) are secondary. (3) They are reliable, with several coming from
574:- I'm on the fence, because I do think Ms. Martin-Green is noteworthy enough to merit an article (there are, arguably, several persons who have less credentials who have WP articles). However, there doesn't appear to be enough sources outside of blogs and IMDB to satisfy
663:. She's been in multiple films. She has been a recurring character on mutliple TV series. And now she's been promoted to the regular cast of the top-rated scripted show on television (The Walking Dead) for its upcoming season:
168:
676:
are subjective. Defining what is a "significant role" can be aided by looking at the roles of other actors who have articles. And I think recurring in a multiple episode arc of a TV series is significant. I watch
667:. If we examine the text of some of the rationales cited in support of deletion, I don't think the policies support deletion in this case. In fact, some of those policies actually support inclusion. For instance,
228:
211:
as to her roles' significance within their productions: she has had no roles that make her encyclopedically notable. Plus, there's nothing reliable (save
Twitter?) to lend actual biographical details.
248:
162:
292:
121:
128:
94:
89:
98:
275:"Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." These roles include roles on
81:
419:
She's actually had significant recurring roles on most of the television programs she's acted on. I wouldn't simply write them off as minor.
647:
537:
524:
664:
183:
644:
545:
150:
296:
17:
446:
441:
288:
284:
629:
These are not significant roles as per the criteria, I think, and I can't locate significant coverage of Martin-Green.
144:
378:. She's most definitely notable. Her list of accomplishments include roles in major internationally syndicated shows.
719:
699:
655:
638:
617:
587:
564:
532:
503:
481:
459:
411:
393:
364:
334:
308:
260:
240:
220:
63:
738:
140:
85:
40:
651:
541:
528:
681:. Sonequa Martin-Green was integral to many episodes and the main story arc of one of the lead characters.
455:
304:
190:
402:
Which of her roles are substantial or significant? Appearing in minor roles in major shows is not notable.
687:
734:
520:
477:
451:
300:
36:
473:
605:
77:
69:
691:
668:
665:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/walking-dead-season-4-spoilers-tyreese-beth-sasha-432869
604:
state until reliable sources show she's notable. Keep proponents are advised to do draft, but only
491:
390:
176:
472:
and most of the actors on that show have an article. I don't think this article should be deleted.
156:
57:
715:
634:
597:
256:
236:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
733:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
673:
516:
272:
208:
682:
613:
601:
583:
499:
407:
360:
344:
330:
318:
216:
204:
293:'Walking Dead' actress Sonequa Martin-Green joins 'Once Upon a Time' cast in mystery role
343:
Note: I've removed two sources this editor has offered on the article space for blatant
560:
383:
431:
322:
280:
200:
54:
711:
672:
discussion. Comparisons are definitely relevant in this case, but some elements of
630:
494:. This discussion is about the subject's notability, not what's in other articles.
348:
252:
232:
115:
703:
600:. I sincerely hope her career flourishes. This article would be acceptable in a
575:
609:
579:
495:
426:
403:
356:
326:
276:
212:
556:
297:'Walking Dead' Actress Sonequa Martin-Green Is Headed To 'Once Upon A Time'
695:
707:
643:
She was upgraded to a series regular for season 4 of The
Walking Dead
678:
436:
207:
for lack of substantial coverage by reliable sources. She also fails
727:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
229:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
249:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
111:
107:
103:
175:
686:
notable entertainment news or general news sources (
596:I sympathize. I think it's probably just a little
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
741:). No further edits should be made to this page.
291:. Extra sources that can be included include
189:
8:
247:Note: This debate has been included in the
227:Note: This debate has been included in the
321:as to why neither of those "sources" meets
246:
226:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
434:- Courtney Wells (8 Episodes)
355:what that editor has written.
1:
439:- Michelle Terry (5 Episodes)
449:- Tamara (3 Episodes so far)
429:- Kanessa Jones (3 Episodes)
444:- Sasha (5 Episodes so far)
758:
700:Seattle Post-Intelligencer
606:within expected parameters
460:20:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
412:19:20, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
394:09:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
309:06:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
261:13:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
241:13:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
221:01:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
720:01:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
656:00:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
639:20:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
618:02:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
588:20:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
565:16:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
533:15:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
504:12:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
482:08:53, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
365:12:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
335:12:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
64:02:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
730:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
688:The Hollywood Reporter
271:. The actress has met
546:few or no other edits
519:. This AfD smacks of
548:outside this topic.
515:Obviously she meets
78:Sonequa Martin-Green
70:Sonequa Martin-Green
692:The Huffington Post
199:This subject fails
48:The result was
549:
263:
243:
749:
732:
535:
470:The Walking Dead
447:Once Upon a Time
442:The Walking Dead
388:
382:
289:Once Upon a Time
285:The Walking Dead
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
60:
34:
757:
756:
752:
751:
750:
748:
747:
746:
745:
739:deletion review
728:
384:
380:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
755:
753:
744:
743:
723:
722:
658:
641:
623:
622:
621:
620:
591:
590:
568:
567:
550:
521:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
509:
508:
507:
506:
485:
484:
450:
445:
440:
435:
430:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
414:
397:
396:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
353:do not support
351:: the sources
338:
337:
312:
311:
265:
264:
244:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
754:
742:
740:
736:
731:
725:
724:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
684:
680:
675:
670:
666:
662:
659:
657:
653:
649:
648:93.209.74.190
645:
642:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
624:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
594:
593:
592:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
570:
569:
566:
562:
558:
554:
551:
547:
543:
539:
538:93.209.88.115
534:
530:
526:
525:93.209.88.115
522:
518:
514:
511:
510:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:
487:
486:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:
463:
462:
461:
457:
453:
452:Silver Buizel
448:
443:
438:
433:
432:The Good Wife
428:
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
395:
392:
391:
389:
387:
377:
374:
373:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
315:
314:
313:
310:
306:
302:
301:Silver Buizel
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
281:The Good Wife
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
245:
242:
238:
234:
230:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
729:
726:
669:WP:OTHERCRAP
660:
626:
571:
552:
512:
492:WP:OTHERCRAP
469:
468:. She is in
465:
425:
416:
385:
379:
375:
352:
268:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
704:Digital Spy
578:standards.
544:) has made
474:Marty2Hotty
325:standards.
163:free images
598:WP:TOOSOON
427:Army Wives
277:Army Wives
735:talk page
674:WP:NACTOR
517:WP:NACTOR
273:WP:NACTOR
253:• Gene93k
233:• Gene93k
209:WP:NACTOR
37:talk page
737:or in a
698:via the
696:TV Guide
683:WP:BASIC
602:WP:DRAFT
417:Comment.
345:WP:SYNTH
319:WP:BLOGS
205:WP:BASIC
122:View log
39:or in a
712:JamesAM
708:TV Line
702:site),
631:Hekerui
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
59:Faraone
679:NYC 22
627:Delete
572:Delete
553:Delete
437:NYC 22
323:WP:BLP
201:WP:GNG
141:Google
99:delete
610:JFHJr
580:Kkbay
496:JFHJr
404:JFHJr
386:AMBER
357:JFHJr
349:WP:OR
327:JFHJr
213:JFHJr
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
716:talk
661:Keep
652:talk
635:talk
584:talk
576:WP:V
561:talk
557:Whpq
542:talk
529:talk
513:Keep
490:See
478:talk
466:Keep
456:talk
381:—♦♦
376:Keep
317:See
305:talk
287:and
269:Keep
257:talk
237:talk
203:and
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
50:keep
191:TWL
120:– (
718:)
706:,
694:,
690:,
654:)
646:--
637:)
616:)
608:.
586:)
563:)
536:—
531:)
523:--
502:)
480:)
458:)
410:)
363:)
333:)
307:)
299:.
295:,
283:,
279:,
259:)
251:.
239:)
231:.
219:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
52:.
714:(
650:(
633:(
614:㊟
612:(
582:(
559:(
540:(
527:(
500:㊟
498:(
476:(
454:(
408:㊟
406:(
361:㊟
359:(
347:/
331:㊟
329:(
303:(
255:(
235:(
217:㊟
215:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
55:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.