Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Scoop (TV series) - Knowledge

Source 📝

311:-- I agree that it's borderline and especially difficult to search for -- "scoop" is not a useful search term for news articles about much of anything, unfortunately, and given that it is associated with the BBC we're losing a whole range of potential independent sources. Google searches make it pretty clear that it's well known enough a quantity, though I fully acknowledge this isn't necessarily helpful in determining notability. However, it's a nationally broadcast show that lasted several years on the largest national broadcast network. This seems like the type of thing that 212: 288: 206: 268: 385:
It's a kid's show so formulaic they have to keep it locked behind the service desk to prevent other bad writers from stealing their tired plots, but it just passes
165: 368:. I agree with Matt91486 that a BBC series that ran for three seasons is likely to be notable, even if currently searchable sources seem to be hard to find. — 112: 97: 172: 138: 133: 142: 125: 227: 194: 92: 85: 17: 188: 106: 102: 247:
for over 11 years because it's tricky. TV series on BBC, with notable actors and writers. I don't think it does pass
336: 184: 436: 40: 417: 377: 354: 327: 300: 280: 260: 67: 234: 129: 432: 36: 350: 248: 408: 373: 323: 296: 276: 220: 200: 121: 81: 73: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
431:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
386: 256: 62: 346: 396: 369: 319: 292: 272: 390: 365: 312: 159: 252: 53: 318:, and has passing mentions in various articles about the participants. 316: 244: 425:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
339:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
315:
is made for. It can at least be verified independently by
155: 151: 147: 219: 345:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 289:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 439:). No further edits should be made to this page. 287:Note: This discussion has been included in the 267:Note: This discussion has been included in the 269:list of Television-related deletion discussions 233: 8: 251:though, based on coverage and significance. 113:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 286: 266: 7: 24: 98:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 243:Borderline and has been in 88:(AfD)? Read these primers! 456: 328:06:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC) 301:13:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 281:13:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 261:13:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 68:00:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 428:Please do not modify it. 418:01:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 378:01:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 355:01:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 86:Articles for deletion 415: 357: 303: 283: 122:Scoop (TV series) 103:Guide to deletion 93:How to contribute 74:Scoop (TV series) 447: 430: 416: 411: 405: 404: 399: 344: 342: 340: 238: 237: 223: 175: 163: 145: 83: 60: 34: 455: 454: 450: 449: 448: 446: 445: 444: 443: 437:deletion review 426: 409: 402: 397: 394: 358: 335: 333: 180: 171: 136: 120: 117: 80: 77: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 453: 451: 442: 441: 421: 420: 380: 343: 332: 331: 330: 305: 304: 284: 241: 240: 177: 116: 115: 110: 100: 95: 78: 76: 71: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 452: 440: 438: 434: 429: 423: 422: 419: 414: 412: 401: 400: 392: 388: 384: 381: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 360: 359: 356: 352: 348: 341: 338: 329: 325: 321: 317: 314: 310: 307: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 285: 282: 278: 274: 270: 265: 264: 263: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249:WP:NOTABILITY 246: 236: 232: 229: 226: 222: 218: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 186: 183: 182:Find sources: 178: 174: 170: 167: 161: 157: 153: 149: 144: 140: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 118: 114: 111: 108: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 90: 89: 87: 82: 75: 72: 70: 69: 66: 65: 61: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 427: 424: 406: 395: 382: 361: 334: 308: 242: 230: 224: 216: 209: 203: 197: 191: 181: 168: 79: 63: 56: 55: 49: 47: 31: 28: 207:free images 347:Jack Frost 433:talk page 387:WP:TVSHOW 370:Toughpigs 320:matt91486 293:Shellwood 273:Shellwood 37:talk page 435:or in a 337:Relisted 166:View log 107:glossary 39:or in a 410:chatter 213:WP refs 201:scholar 139:protect 134:history 84:New to 391:WP:NTV 366:WP:NTV 313:WP:NTV 253:Boleyn 245:CAT:NN 185:Google 143:delete 57:BD2412 228:JSTOR 189:books 173:Stats 160:views 152:watch 148:links 16:< 398:Nate 389:and 383:Keep 374:talk 364:per 362:Keep 351:talk 324:talk 309:Keep 297:talk 277:talk 257:talk 221:FENS 195:news 156:logs 130:talk 126:edit 50:keep 235:TWL 164:– ( 393:. 376:) 353:) 326:) 299:) 291:. 279:) 271:. 259:) 215:) 158:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 52:. 413:) 407:( 403:• 372:( 349:( 322:( 295:( 275:( 255:( 239:) 231:· 225:· 217:· 210:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 187:( 179:( 176:) 169:· 162:) 124:( 109:) 105:( 64:T

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
BD2412
T
00:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Scoop (TV series)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Scoop (TV series)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.