312:. The nomination does not state a valid basis for deletion; the number of articles in Scots Knowledge is not particularly relevant to whether it deserves an article on English Knowledge. On the other hand, its notability might reasonably be challenged, as it was in August 2007 when no sources were identified and the
338:, if barely. Additional references in reliable sources would obviously strengthen the case. Although Google shows a number of discussions on forums, I haven't found much else in RS sources, other than brief mentions in some Scotland guidebooks such as
466:. It has several mentions in online-discoverable UK media, specifically addressing its cultural significance. Proposer has given no valid justification, and I'm also not thrilled that I wasn't messaged regarding this proposal.
288:
This is a well-referenced article about a notable
Knowledge. The lack of a "large number of articles" is not a valid argument for deletion, and there is no basis for comparing it to the French or Spanish Wikipedias.
190:
313:
90:
85:
382:
As a Scot I am not entirely convinced of the value of the Scots
Knowledge (as opposed to our having an article about it), but it seems like it is here to stay and the nominator's rationale is absurd.
339:
342:
444:- while the nomination is indeed not based in policy, since the discussion is here, I do not belive this is a sufficiently notable Knowledge for a stand-alone article. -
184:
145:
244:
222:
79:
150:
276:
323:
118:
113:
122:
475:
455:
432:
415:
398:
374:
354:
304:
279:
258:
236:
61:
393:
105:
17:
205:
172:
345:, where an overwhelming consensus affirmed the legitimacy of the project and rejected an August 2011 closure proposal. --
272:
494:
166:
40:
471:
449:
267:
162:
490:
369:
255:
233:
57:
36:
212:
388:
363:
109:
467:
445:
350:
297:
198:
441:
428:
318:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
489:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
178:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
248:
226:
53:
383:
101:
67:
265:
This wiki does not have a large amount of articles, unlike the French or
Spanish wikis.
346:
290:
424:
411:
335:
327:
316:
reached a "delete" result. However, the article now contains a solid source from
139:
332:
407:
406:- The nomination does not propose a policy based rationale for deletion.
362:– This nomination does not contain a valid rationale for deletion, per
483:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
341:. Additional background about Scots Knowledge may be found at
343:
meta:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Scots
Knowledge
325:
and HighBeam produced a similar, shorter one from the
135:
131:
127:
423:, per all of the above. Nothing much to add really. --
197:
91:
Articles for deletion/Scots
Knowledge (3rd nomination)
86:
Articles for deletion/Scots
Knowledge (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
497:). No further edits should be made to this page.
334:, so I guess we can say that this now passes
245:list of Scotland-related deletion discussions
223:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
211:
8:
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
221:Note: This debate has been included in the
242:
220:
76:
80:Articles for deletion/Scots Knowledge
7:
74:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
464:originator of current version
514:
476:17:35, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
456:01:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
62:04:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
433:21:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
416:21:30, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
399:18:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
375:08:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
355:05:35, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
305:05:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
280:03:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
259:17:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
237:17:48, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
486:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
442:List of Wikipedias
319:Scotland on Sunday
48:The result was
465:
373:
261:
239:
505:
488:
463:
452:
396:
391:
386:
372:
370:Northamerica1000
367:
302:
300:Let's discuss it
294:
252:
230:
216:
215:
201:
153:
143:
125:
34:
513:
512:
508:
507:
506:
504:
503:
502:
501:
495:deletion review
484:
454:
450:
394:
389:
384:
368:
298:
292:
250:
228:
158:
149:
116:
102:Scots Knowledge
100:
97:
95:
82:
71:
68:Scots Knowledge
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
511:
509:
500:
499:
479:
478:
468:MatthewVanitas
458:
448:
446:The Bushranger
435:
418:
401:
377:
357:
307:
263:
262:
240:
218:
155:
96:
94:
93:
88:
83:
78:
75:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
510:
498:
496:
492:
487:
481:
480:
477:
473:
469:
462:
459:
457:
453:
451:One ping only
447:
443:
439:
436:
434:
430:
426:
422:
419:
417:
413:
409:
405:
402:
400:
397:
392:
387:
381:
378:
376:
371:
365:
364:WP:DEL-REASON
361:
358:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
333:
330:
329:
324:
321:
320:
315:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
296:
295:
287:
284:
283:
282:
281:
278:
275:
274:
270:
269:
260:
257:
254:
253:
246:
241:
238:
235:
232:
231:
224:
219:
214:
210:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
161:
160:Find sources:
156:
152:
147:
141:
137:
133:
129:
124:
120:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
98:
92:
89:
87:
84:
81:
77:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
485:
482:
460:
437:
420:
403:
379:
359:
328:Daily Mirror
326:
317:
309:
299:
291:
285:
271:
266:
264:
249:
227:
208:
202:
194:
187:
181:
175:
169:
159:
49:
47:
31:
28:
360:Speedy Keep
273:ChampionMan
185:free images
54:Mark Arsten
50:Speedy Keep
314:second AfD
491:talk page
347:Arxiloxos
310:Weak keep
37:talk page
493:or in a
438:Redirect
425:Deskford
146:View log
39:or in a
191:WP refs
179:scholar
119:protect
114:history
336:WP:GNG
293:Cullen
163:Google
123:delete
256:Smith
251:Cliff
234:Smith
229:Cliff
206:JSTOR
167:books
151:Stats
140:views
132:watch
128:links
16:<
472:talk
461:Keep
429:talk
421:Keep
412:talk
404:Keep
380:Keep
351:talk
286:Keep
277:1234
199:FENS
173:news
136:logs
110:talk
106:edit
58:talk
440:to
408:KTC
395:Dui
390:Mac
385:Ben
268:The
213:TWL
148:•
144:– (
474:)
431:)
414:)
366:.
353:)
247:.
225:.
193:)
138:|
134:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
60:)
52:.
470:(
427:(
410:(
349:(
331:,
322:,
217:)
209:·
203:·
195:·
188:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
165:(
157:(
154:)
142:)
104:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.