274:
Please take a look at my
Knowledge page now as I added five references which did not include the Internations interview. If need be I'll add another 25. I understand your concern about COI, but If the page is neutral and a statement of verifiable fact, then there should be no COI. Nor am I attempting
219:
I have links to several hundred articles written by me for the publications I listed and while I admit I am certainly no "notable" superstar, in
Southeast Asia I am quite a well known journalist, photographer and YouTube personality who has helped countless viewers of my site. My point is just how
291:
to be editing a page which is about yourself. For one thing, it is quite hard to see objectively whether or not you have enough independent secondary mentions to be considered notable. And it is very hard to write neutrally about yourself. And it appears that this page has been almost entirely
255:
for your claim that you are well known for anything. YouTube views aren't sufficient, actual independent webpages or something where someone discusses you is what is required. I'll note the COI issues I didn't mention in the nomination. --
279:
The answer to your question, Scott, is that you need to be noted in independent secondary sources. If you are interested in the notability criteria of journalists (which seems to be the category this page would fit into), see here:
170:
220:
notable do I need to be to the people around the world? Please let me know anything you think I can or should do to add to the chance of the biography being included in
Knowledge. Thank you.
248:
123:
164:
201:
No indication that this is a notable individual. It doesn't seem like the YouTube account is notable, the book is notable or the acting is.
130:
238:
96:
91:
100:
17:
185:
83:
152:
374:
40:
344:
and to edit the page in accordance to that. If the user page is against that guideline, it may be deleted too.
146:
142:
370:
357:
351:
316:
265:
234:
210:
65:
59:
36:
87:
281:
261:
226:
206:
192:
178:
322:
271:
216:
79:
71:
307:. My advice to you is to stick to producing your own content and edit other areas of wikipedia.
325:
Is it possible to simply put the page as my
Userpage? Scott Mallon 06:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
222:
I will / can add links to at least some of the articles and photographs and other information.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
369:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
346:
337:
331:
230:
54:
341:
257:
247:
I've searched google news, books and the web and the most extensive mention I've found is
202:
158:
312:
296:
288:
117:
303:
significant about you which has not been written by you. So I'm going to say
308:
363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113:
109:
105:
177:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
377:). No further edits should be made to this page.
191:
8:
287:As a general rule, it is considered a
7:
24:
275:to use the page to self-promote.
292:written and edited by yourself.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
52:. per user's request below.
358:11:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
317:20:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
266:11:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
211:10:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
66:11:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
394:
336:Yes, I moved the page to
366:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
340:. But, be sure to read
299:aside, I'm not seeing
243:
229:comment added by
385:
368:
354:
349:
338:User:Scottmallon
335:
242:
223:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
62:
57:
34:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
381:
375:deletion review
364:
352:
347:
329:
224:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
60:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
391:
389:
380:
379:
360:
320:
319:
293:
285:
269:
268:
221:
213:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
390:
378:
376:
372:
367:
361:
359:
356:
355:
350:
343:
339:
333:
328:
327:
326:
324:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
282:WP:JOURNALIST
278:
277:
276:
273:
267:
263:
259:
254:
250:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
218:
214:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
63:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
365:
362:
345:
323:Scott Mallon
321:
304:
300:
295:Leaving the
272:Scott Mallon
270:
252:
225:— Preceding
217:Scott Mallon
215:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
80:Scott Mallon
72:Scott Mallon
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
348:Vanjagenije
332:Scottmallon
231:Scottmallon
165:free images
56:Vanjagenije
258:Ricky81682
251:. We need
203:Ricky81682
371:talk page
37:talk page
373:or in a
342:WP:UPYES
301:anything
253:evidence
249:this one
239:contribs
227:unsigned
124:View log
39:or in a
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
353:(talk)
305:delete
297:WP:COI
289:WP:COI
143:Google
101:delete
61:(talk)
50:userfy
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
313:talk
309:JMWt
262:talk
235:talk
207:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
193:TWL
122:– (
315:)
264:)
241:)
237:•
209:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
334::
330:@
311:(
284:.
260:(
233:(
205:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.