Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Second Glance (film) - Knowledge

Source 📝

151: 145: 112: 328:
to me. There are just so many Afds by this nominator, it is hard to count them. Time to stop. May well require a chat/warning from an admin, but not necessarily a block.
230: 85: 80: 89: 72: 255:
Certainly long enough, descriptive enough, contains much more than just plot, its few references back up the plot summary and notablity. –
166: 133: 17: 127: 49: 123: 361: 337: 314: 262: 244: 221: 195: 54: 378: 311: 76: 36: 173: 377:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
355: 259: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
333: 347: 325: 329: 139: 304: 68: 60: 351: 256: 159: 240: 191: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
281: 217: 343: 209: 205: 183: 342:
Perhaps a {{trout}} or {{whale}}? Given that all of the nominations in question here are
277: 289: 285: 273: 300: 292: 236: 187: 106: 213: 296: 295:
guidelines. Also, nom's recent spat of deletion prods and noms being toward
371:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
208:
would you say it does not meet? What are some parts of
102: 98: 94: 158: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 381:). No further edits should be made to this page. 204:Because we are about consensus, which part of 172: 8: 229:Note: This debate has been included in the 288:nomination shows a misunderstanding of the 228: 231:list of Film-related deletion discussions 278:multiple reliable sources are available 7: 182:Film is not notable. Doesn't meet 24: 212:that you would say it does meet? 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 276:is a poor deletion rationale, 1: 362:19:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 338:16:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 315:22:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 263:17:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 245:00:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 222:23:42, 18 October 2011 (UTC) 196:21:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC) 55:01:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC) 398: 346:, it smells distinctly of 324:: It seems like a case of 374:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 69:Second Glance (film) 61:Second Glance (film) 302:is MOST worrisome. 284:, and nominator's 44:The result was 299:-related articles 247: 234: 389: 376: 358: 307: 235: 177: 176: 162: 110: 92: 52: 34: 397: 396: 392: 391: 390: 388: 387: 386: 385: 379:deletion review 372: 360: 356: 344:Christian films 305: 119: 83: 67: 64: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 395: 393: 384: 383: 367: 366: 365: 364: 354: 352:The Bushranger 348:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 326:WP:Tag bombing 318: 317: 266: 265: 257:Phoenix B 1of3 249: 248: 225: 224: 180: 179: 116: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 394: 382: 380: 375: 369: 368: 363: 359: 357:One ping only 353: 349: 345: 341: 340: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 320: 319: 316: 313: 312: 309: 308: 301: 298: 294: 291: 287: 283: 282:due diligence 279: 275: 271: 268: 267: 264: 261: 258: 254: 251: 250: 246: 242: 238: 232: 227: 226: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200: 199: 198: 197: 193: 189: 185: 175: 171: 168: 165: 161: 157: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 129: 125: 122: 121:Find sources: 117: 114: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 373: 370: 321: 310: 303: 269: 252: 201: 181: 169: 163: 155: 148: 142: 136: 130: 120: 45: 43: 31: 28: 330:History2007 322:Speedy keep 270:Speedy keep 253:Speedy Keep 146:free images 293:notability 290:applicable 286:well-meant 297:Christian 237:• Gene93k 306:Schmidt, 210:WP:MOVIE 206:WP:MOVIE 184:WP:MOVIE 113:View log 188:Dkchana 152:WP refs 140:scholar 86:protect 81:history 274:WP:JNN 260:(talk) 214:Invmog 124:Google 90:delete 280:with 167:JSTOR 128:books 107:views 99:watch 95:links 51:m.o.p 16:< 350:. - 334:talk 241:talk 218:talk 202:Keep 192:talk 160:FENS 134:news 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 46:keep 272:as 174:TWL 111:– ( 336:) 243:) 233:. 220:) 194:) 186:. 154:) 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 48:. 332:( 239:( 216:( 190:( 178:) 170:· 164:· 156:· 149:· 143:· 137:· 131:· 126:( 118:( 115:) 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
m.o.p
01:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Second Glance (film)
Second Glance (film)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:MOVIE
Dkchana
talk
21:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
WP:MOVIE

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.