999:. The article is merely the biography of one man breaking away from religion to more fully engage with secularity, but the subject—Srully Abe Stein—is not particularly notable. Perhaps notes from his experience can be merged into general articles on related phenomenon—the relationship between secular courts and religious courts as pertains to divorce—for instance. This is a young man attending college, formerly Orthodox, with children, with interests, it seems to me, in both religious and secular matters. I don't think notability, for Knowledge purposes, is attained based on those fairly unremarkable specifics. I don't think the articles in the Wall Street Journal and Haaretz are establishing notability, for Knowledge purposes, for a biography of the individual. Those sources are discussing a phenomenon. That phenomenon is noteworthy. But we already have articles on that phenomenon. The individual serves to illustrate the phenomenon. But this should not be construed as conferring notability on the individual.
80:
830:. Paid editors, especially those who are paid by the hour, or who submit "billable hours" to justify their salaries, must respect the volunteer nature of the project and keep discussions concise. No editor should be subjected to long or repetitive discussions by someone who is being paid to argue with them. Any editor who refuses to accept a consensus against his or her position by arguing
961:) to push the ludicrous assertion that an unremarkable undergraduate student is the 21st Century's answer to Socrates. He has "hundreds of Facebook followers"...? Big fucking deal, so does my sister. A teenage cousin of mine has approximately 1500 and yet is not on Knowledge begging for attention. This article is taking the piss.
557:
community that are known for hating everyone that leaves them, trying to shut them up, and hate when people speak up. I feel that for the sake of the people who left this community, this has to stay. Especially considering that Srully is of great interest because of his family status.
681:
and not in
English, s well as being fourms and not normal sites. It is necessary to understand the nature of the subject and community, where this is as formal as it gets. At the same time, this shows an big interest in the subject and his works, and asks for the need of an article.
810:
You also claim that you "are part of a semi publishing company...This article was written combined by 3 of our staff, and edited by another" which, without more clarification from you, you, you, you, you, and you, then raises the question of violating
335:
they are links to Wall Street
Journal, Haaratz, and an outside You Tube clip, as well as Kava Shtiebal Fourm (there was other fourm as well that was deleted by someone, they will be entered soon) thy clearly shows independent interest in this person.
643:
covered by the media (not just as part of minor family scandals) or is cited in reliable sources, the subject can be revisited, but for now there is not much of anything here to justify it as encyclopedic or "noteworthy". Thank you,
552:
I agree with the writer, the subject is very interesting, at least to hundreds of people in my community. I don't know who those people that are requiring to delete it our, but it seems to me that they are people in the
285:
894:
that topic under the guise of "publishing" and "editorship" and whatnot. Hopefully an admin will look into this and give us some clear guidance before the matter gets out of hand. Thank you,
391:
I see that
Fultichan asked on your talk page why you deleted th "writings" section. I agree with him, and it seems to be really interesting. Fultichan, I think you should add it again.
677:
forums that do both, talk about him as for himself, and discuss his theology and philosophy. While we understand that these sources have two issues, one being that they are in
238:
87:
384:
I agree with
Fultichan. Both of the articles linked although they also talk about other people, they chose Srully's picture, and that is how it was published. That does show
279:
516:
501:
738:
this account is shared by a group of 6 people that are part of a semi publishing company, working on doing research and publications regarding several Jewish -
486:
388:
interest in him. Also from the forums that were linked it is evident that at least in specific communities that is a big interest in Srully and his thoughts.
870:
as such since it discusses how the subject rejected his former
Hasidic way of life and is now an atheist, so if anything what you are writing about is
245:
581:
211:
206:
620:
540:
418:
407:
215:
198:
96:
316:
The subject lacks sufficient depth of coverage in reliable, intellectually independent sources to meet the notability guideline at
355:
696:
Also, we are not in any way affiliate with the subject, although we do know him in person, and are exposed to him and his works.
585:
426:
126:
467:
300:
17:
816:
267:
879:
835:
931:
839:
788:
You claim that "this account is shared by a group of 6 people that are part of a semi publishing company" that violates
606:
112:
628:
261:
85:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
1053:
821:
Paid editors who insert material that is promotional in tone into an article may be presumed to be violating our
40:
623:). This article relies on personal blogs and self-promotion and no real RS at all. The article clearly violates
883:
789:
577:
563:
451:
the other part of the discussion. I believe that by now we have provided enough evidence to keep this article.
1034:
1008:
989:
970:
943:
903:
780:
forums that do both, talk about him as for himself" yet you show no awareness of
Knowledge's requirements for
751:
726:
705:
691:
666:
653:
567:
544:
523:
508:
493:
471:
411:
379:
345:
329:
63:
422:
403:
257:
793:
614:
202:
843:
812:
158:
886:. Thus it is therefore intellectually dishonest and abuse of logic for you to claim that you are writing
1049:
915:
663:
610:
535:
520:
505:
490:
399:
307:
36:
862:
related subject " which is very strange because if this article of yours is anything to go by, it has
194:
69:
624:
455:
395:
142:
116:
767:
743:
712:
697:
683:
459:
337:
858:
You also claim that you are "working on doing research and publications regarding several Jewish -
747:
701:
687:
573:
559:
463:
341:
293:
101:
1029:
1004:
851:
632:
148:
79:
985:
803:
359:
273:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1048:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
742:
related subject. This article was written combined by 3 of our staff, and edited by another.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
925:
722:
600:
375:
325:
962:
867:
317:
939:
899:
822:
649:
1025:
1017:
1000:
958:
847:
827:
826:
Advertising, promotion, public relations, and marketing are prohibited by our policy
59:
981:
875:
781:
367:
176:
164:
132:
796:: "Because an account represents your edits as an individual, 'role accounts', or
232:
111:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
921:
733:
718:
596:
371:
321:
52:. Pure promotion. Had I seen this earlier, I would have speedy deleted as G11.
831:
935:
895:
645:
834:
will likely be violating several
Knowledge guidelines and policies, e.g.
54:
859:
799:
accounts shared by multiple people, are as a rule forbidden and blocked
739:
678:
554:
1020:
is the correct forum for blocking an account that is used by multiple
819:: "Paid editing is the practice of accepting money to edit Knowledge.
920:
Oversight on my part. I have now made the correction that it's User
448:
662:
N.b. I have not !voted herein; I only provided deletion sorting.
1042:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
957:- This is pure spam that uses social networking posts (and now
890:
a topic when it is obvious that you have a POV agenda to write
980:
Fails notability requirements, possible spam/self-promotional
639:
the subject picks up fame/notoriety/whathaveyou and then gets
74:
772:
and NOTE to closing admin/s: What you say is very troubling.
105:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
228:
224:
220:
292:
366:
coverage of the subject. Youtube and forums are not
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1056:). No further edits should be made to this page.
517:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
306:
125:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
95:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has
8:
515:Note: This debate has been included in the
502:list of Judaism-related deletion discussions
500:Note: This debate has been included in the
485:Note: This debate has been included in the
817:Knowledge:Conflict of interest#Paid editing
784:that is a key requirement for any article.
487:list of People-related deletion discussions
1016:elete. Fails general notability guidance.
514:
499:
484:
99:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
119:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
794:Knowledge:Sock puppetry#Role accounts
673:We provided a whole list of links to
7:
802:..." so by all rights you should be
24:
934:) I was referring to. Thank you,
362:. Neither one appears to provide
806:ASAP by an admin who sees this.
78:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
1035:15:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
1009:13:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
990:13:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
971:05:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
944:16:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
904:10:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
880:Category:Criticism of Judaism
752:23:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
727:19:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
706:04:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
692:04:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
667:14:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
654:13:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
635:. Maybe in a few years time,
568:20:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
545:18:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
524:08:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
509:08:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
494:08:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
472:08:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
412:07:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
380:07:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
346:07:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
330:07:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
115:on the part of others and to
64:18:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
1073:
1045:Please do not modify it.
884:Category:Hasidic Judaism
32:Please do not modify it.
882:and certainly NOT into
157:; accounts blocked for
127:single-purpose accounts
97:policies and guidelines
836:WP:Tendentious editing
840:WP:Disruptive editing
586:few or no other edits
427:few or no other edits
878:that would fit into
588:outside this topic.
429:outside this topic.
629:WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK
109:by counting votes.
88:not a majority vote
965:
48:The result was
1032:
963:
790:WP:Group accounts
589:
526:
511:
496:
475:
458:comment added by
430:
415:
398:comment added by
190:
189:
186:
113:assume good faith
1064:
1047:
1030:
968:
919:
916:Northamerica1000
825:
800:
771:
737:
716:
571:
474:
452:
416:
414:
392:
368:reliable sources
311:
310:
296:
248:
236:
218:
195:Srully Abe Stein
184:
172:
156:
140:
121:
91:, but instead a
82:
75:
70:Srully Abe Stein
34:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1054:deletion review
1043:
966:
913:
868:Hasidic Judaism
844:WP:WikiBullying
820:
813:WP:Paid editing
798:
765:
731:
710:
543:
453:
393:
253:
244:
209:
193:
174:
162:
146:
130:
117:sign your posts
73:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1070:
1068:
1059:
1058:
1038:
1037:
1011:
993:
992:
974:
973:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
670:
669:
657:
656:
590:
574:Chavie Feldman
560:Chavie Feldman
547:
539:
528:
527:
512:
497:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
354:That would be
349:
348:
314:
313:
250:
188:
187:
83:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1069:
1057:
1055:
1051:
1046:
1040:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
995:
994:
991:
987:
983:
979:
976:
975:
972:
969:
960:
956:
953:
952:
945:
941:
937:
933:
930:
927:
923:
917:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
874:-Hasidism or
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
824:
818:
814:
809:
805:
801:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
776:You mention "
775:
769:
753:
749:
745:
741:
735:
730:
729:
728:
724:
720:
717:who is "we"?
714:
709:
708:
707:
703:
699:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
680:
676:
672:
671:
668:
665:
661:
660:
659:
658:
655:
651:
647:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
625:WP:NOTSOAPBOX
622:
619:
616:
612:
611:Malik Shabazz
608:
605:
602:
598:
594:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
569:
565:
561:
556:
551:
548:
546:
542:
537:
536:Malik Shabazz
533:
530:
529:
525:
522:
518:
513:
510:
507:
503:
498:
495:
492:
488:
483:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
450:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
428:
424:
420:
419:160.39.50.157
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:160.39.50.157
397:
390:
389:
387:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:
351:
350:
347:
343:
339:
334:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
309:
305:
302:
299:
295:
291:
287:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
259:
256:
255:Find sources:
251:
247:
243:
240:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
213:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
191:
182:
178:
170:
166:
160:
154:
150:
144:
138:
134:
128:
124:
120:
118:
114:
108:
104:
103:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
77:
76:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1044:
1041:
1022:Homo sapiens
1021:
1013:
996:
977:
954:
928:
891:
887:
876:Anti-Judaism
871:
863:
855:
807:
797:
785:
777:
773:
764:
674:
664:NorthAmerica
640:
636:
617:
603:
592:
549:
531:
521:NorthAmerica
506:NorthAmerica
491:NorthAmerica
454:— Preceding
394:— Preceding
385:
363:
315:
303:
297:
289:
282:
276:
270:
264:
254:
241:
180:
168:
159:sockpuppetry
152:
141:; suspected
136:
122:
110:
106:
100:
92:
86:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
866:to do with
852:WP:Civility
633:WP:NOTFORUM
609:) and User
584:) has made
534:per nom. —
425:) has made
386:significant
364:significant
280:free images
832:ad nauseam
804:WP:BLOCKED
93:discussion
1050:talk page
768:Fultichan
744:Fultichan
713:Fultichan
698:Fultichan
684:Fultichan
641:seriously
595:per User
460:Fultichan
338:Fultichan
149:canvassed
143:canvassed
102:consensus
37:talk page
1052:or in a
1001:Bus stop
932:contribs
621:contribs
607:contribs
582:contribs
468:contribs
456:unsigned
408:contribs
396:unsigned
318:WP:BASIC
239:View log
181:username
175:{{subst:
169:username
163:{{subst:
153:username
147:{{subst:
137:username
131:{{subst:
39:or in a
892:against
864:nothing
860:Hasidic
823:WP:NPOV
778:outside
740:Hasidic
679:Yiddish
675:outside
555:Hasidic
286:WP refs
274:scholar
212:protect
207:history
145:users:
1018:WP:ANI
997:Delete
978:Delete
964:ŞůṜīΣĻ
955:Delete
922:VQuakr
848:WP:Own
828:WP:NOT
734:VQuakr
719:VQuakr
631:&
627:&
597:VQuakr
593:Delete
532:Delete
372:VQuakr
322:VQuakr
258:Google
216:delete
50:delete
888:about
854:..."
782:WP:RS
541:Stalk
447:Read
301:JSTOR
262:books
246:Stats
233:views
225:watch
221:links
123:Note:
60:talk
16:<
1031:T@lk
1005:talk
986:talk
967:¹98¹
959:SPAs
940:talk
936:IZAK
926:talk
900:talk
896:IZAK
872:anti
815:aka
792:aka
748:talk
723:talk
702:talk
688:talk
650:talk
646:IZAK
615:talk
601:talk
578:talk
564:talk
550:Keep
464:talk
449:here
423:talk
404:talk
376:talk
360:here
358:and
356:here
342:talk
326:talk
294:FENS
268:news
229:logs
203:talk
199:edit
1026:JFW
982:Avi
850:or
308:TWL
237:– (
177:csp
173:or
165:csm
133:spa
107:not
55:DGG
1028:|
1024:.
1007:)
988:)
942:)
902:)
856:d.
846:,
842:,
838:,
808:c.
786:b.
774:a.
750:)
725:)
704:)
690:)
652:)
637:if
580:•
572:—
566:)
519:.
504:.
489:.
470:)
466:•
417:—
410:)
406:•
378:)
370:.
344:)
328:)
320:.
288:)
231:|
227:|
223:|
219:|
214:|
210:|
205:|
201:|
183:}}
171:}}
161::
155:}}
139:}}
129::
62:)
1014:D
1003:(
984:(
938:(
929:·
924:(
918::
914:@
898:(
770::
766:@
746:(
736::
732:@
721:(
715::
711:@
700:(
686:(
648:(
618:·
613:(
604:·
599:(
576:(
570:)
562:(
558:(
538:/
462:(
421:(
402:(
374:(
340:(
324:(
312:)
304:·
298:·
290:·
283:·
277:·
271:·
265:·
260:(
252:(
249:)
242:·
235:)
197:(
185:.
179:|
167:|
151:|
135:|
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
