52:. I'm closing as non consensus because this is not an acceptable group nomination. The previous nomination referred to there is not a good precedent. It covered a much narrower range of topics, all of them specialized aspects of NLP that could probably fit well into a general article; this one also covers individuals and organizations, and the standards for notability & the possible manner or merging & the possible need for redirects are different. (And I'm not sure the previous one was a good close -- though a more justifiable group nomination than this, it still did not have discussion of the individual items, especially items which were added during the nomination.) I suspect we may well end up deleting most or possibly all of these, but they need to be discussed. (And when they are, I advise the nom. not make the argument that books are less reliable in general than other sources, for it is flatly contradictory to policy. Books from reliable publishers, especially academic or learned society publishers, are at least as reliable as journal articles--and often more so, in that they normally get much more stringent peer review because of the greater financial commitment. That they can be more easily cited here without actually being read is a problem; but this must be discussed in individual cases. The book published by the British computer society may or may not actually be a RS, but it would be treated as one unless there is evidence otherwise.)
1074:. Most of them (NLP University, State management) are simply unsourced stubs. Some other more lengthy articles (Sleight of mouth) are context- and discussion-free lists of examples ("...most of the understanding will follow from working through examples, and seeing how these are applied..."). They do not explain the very concepts they purport to be about and WP is
1230:
be treated with more scepticism than scientific articles, depending on who the author is and who the publisher is, although we should be much less sceptical about that than the validity of NLP! However... dragging this comment thread back to the subject at hand... Most of these topics/people are
1070:? These various articles do not seem to be about notable enough aspects NLP (already a niche topic) to deserve their own entries. There is also very little well-sourced and informative material to salvage. Some articles (Future pacing) have only single sources, usually a
890:- Because ... "If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Knowledge regardless of whether it is true or not and regardless of whether you can prove it or not, except perhaps in some ancillary article."
166:
1217:
Books are not peer-reviewed and are usually produced for the simple expedient of making some publisher some money, so although I see your point that I have interpreted WP:SPS too stringently in this case, the idea that
1103:
which is a respectable professional body. More generally, what you're effectively trying to do here is speedy delete this bundle of topics. Please deal with them separately using that process, which is described at
1239:
notable is currently a Stubby McStubstub composed of two sentences that don't really say anything and are dependent upon reading several other NLP articles (some of which have recently been deleted).
933:
160:
1243:
that one if you wish, but the vast majority of these articles have very little in the way of sourcing and very little to add to WP. The biog articles are simple self-promotion.
1151:(after edit conflict) Are you claiming that books cannot be reliable sources? And the ones listed by Colonel Warden are not self-published, including one published by the
121:
1123:
471:
466:
198:
971:
475:
214:
I am also nominating the following related pages for much the same reasons (poor sourcing, promotional or SP sources, fringe topic, notability concerns, etc):
458:
609:
604:
94:
89:
126:
613:
98:
839:
834:
596:
81:
843:
793:
788:
420:
415:
826:
797:
747:
742:
517:
512:
424:
282:
277:
1222:
books should be treated with scepticism is NOT "as ridiculous as the idea that NLP has any scientific basis." It is in fact significantly
181:
751:
655:
650:
521:
374:
369:
286:
148:
780:
659:
407:
378:
236:
231:
915:
734:
563:
558:
504:
328:
323:
269:
240:
701:
696:
642:
567:
361:
332:
1258:
1188:
1141:
705:
223:
17:
550:
315:
142:
688:
1280:
1038:
138:
1292:
1261:
1212:
1191:
1164:
1144:
1117:
1058:
1013:
947:
923:
600:
462:
85:
63:
1078:
a how-to manual. Finally, very few other articles link to these (or rather, they all link to each other, creating a
188:
1311:
454:
40:
1152:
1113:
1100:
1054:
830:
1173:
suggests that books should be treated with scepticism. Although I admit it is very much publisher-dependent.
1288:
411:
738:
1208:
1160:
1079:
1042:
784:
646:
592:
77:
69:
822:
1307:
1203:
books should be treated with scepticism is as ridiculous as the idea that NLP has any scientific basis.
1049:
has not been followed and we should not delete a large heterogeneous bundle without such due diligence.
908:
508:
273:
154:
36:
692:
403:
730:
638:
365:
1249:
1179:
1132:
1109:
1071:
1050:
227:
174:
684:
1284:
1037:; &c. There are obvious alternatives to deletion such as merger with the main article about
554:
319:
1283:: having all these separate articles seems excessive coverage especially when they're short. --
1204:
1156:
1009:
943:
776:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1306:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
954:
Added more not-particularly-notable NLPers, notable only for using WP to promote themselves.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1046:
994:
901:
500:
265:
883:
357:
1199:
only suggests that self-published books should be treated with scepticism. The idea that
1244:
1174:
1127:
887:
219:
1196:
1170:
1105:
1075:
1067:
546:
311:
59:
1025:
There seem to be numerous sources covering the concept of state management such as
1005:
939:
860:
814:
768:
722:
676:
630:
584:
538:
492:
441:
395:
349:
303:
257:
115:
997:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
54:
1082:) and I am positive that the readership of WP would not miss them.
1066:
Are any of these "numerous sources" you mention RS or are they all
449:... and these articles about non- or barely-notable NLP authors:
1300:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1231:
simply not notable enough to warrant their own articles and the
916:
934:
list of
Behavioural science-related deletion discussions
1027:
Gower
Handbook of Leadership and Management Development
856:
852:
848:
810:
806:
802:
764:
760:
756:
718:
714:
710:
672:
668:
664:
626:
622:
618:
580:
576:
572:
534:
530:
526:
488:
484:
480:
437:
433:
429:
391:
387:
383:
345:
341:
337:
299:
295:
291:
253:
249:
245:
111:
107:
103:
173:
1004:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1314:). No further edits should be made to this page.
199:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Anchoring (NLP)
1122:Nobody suggested that during the other recent
909:
902:
922:
187:
8:
972:list of Science-related deletion discussions
970:Note: This debate has been included in the
932:Note: This debate has been included in the
969:
931:
7:
1235:article that Warden seems to think
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
924:11:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
1041:or a similar article such as
1281:Neuro-linguistic programming
197:Same reasons as recent Afd:
1126:. Please explain yourself.
1045:. It therefore seems that
455:David Gordon (psychologist)
1331:
1279:articles on NLP topics to
1169:Most fringe books aren't!
1093:11:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
965:11:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
878:12:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
211:12:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1293:14:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
1262:08:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
1213:20:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
1192:20:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
1165:11:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
1145:20:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
1118:11:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
1059:09:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
1014:15:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
985:07:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
948:15:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
64:04:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
1303:Please do not modify it.
1153:British Computer Society
1101:British Computer Society
1097:NLP for Project Managers
1035:NLP for Project Managers
32:Please do not modify it.
1043:mood management theory
593:Leslie Cameron-Bandler
78:State management (NLP)
70:State management (NLP)
1099:is published by the
823:Shelle Rose Charvet
1241:Merge and redirect
1226:ridiculous. Books
48:The result was
1031:Ahead of the Game
1016:
986:
950:
937:
927:
896:
892:
777:Fazal Inayat-Khan
404:Real People Press
1322:
1305:
1256:
1247:
1186:
1177:
1139:
1130:
1092:
1085:
1072:business website
1003:
999:
984:
977:
964:
957:
938:
926:
921:
920:
918:
913:
911:
906:
904:
898:
895:
891:
877:
870:
864:
846:
818:
800:
772:
754:
731:Stephen Gilligan
726:
708:
680:
662:
634:
616:
588:
570:
542:
524:
501:Connirae Andreas
496:
478:
445:
427:
399:
381:
353:
335:
307:
289:
266:Sleight of mouth
261:
243:
210:
203:
192:
191:
177:
129:
119:
101:
34:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1312:deletion review
1301:
1254:
1250:
1245:
1184:
1180:
1175:
1137:
1133:
1128:
1090:
1086:
1083:
1080:WP:WALLEDGARDEN
992:
982:
978:
975:
962:
958:
955:
914:
907:
900:
899:
875:
871:
868:
837:
821:
791:
775:
745:
729:
699:
683:
653:
639:Judith DeLozier
637:
607:
591:
561:
545:
515:
499:
469:
453:
418:
402:
372:
358:Covert hypnosis
356:
326:
310:
280:
264:
234:
218:
208:
204:
201:
134:
125:
92:
76:
73:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1328:
1326:
1317:
1316:
1296:
1295:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1252:
1182:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1135:
1088:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1001:
1000:
989:
988:
987:
980:
960:
952:
951:
894:
893:
873:
866:
865:
819:
773:
727:
681:
635:
589:
543:
497:
447:
446:
400:
354:
308:
262:
220:NLP University
206:
195:
194:
131:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1327:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1304:
1298:
1297:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1285:Colapeninsula
1282:
1278:
1275:
1263:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1248:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1178:
1172:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1131:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1091:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1002:
998:
996:
991:
990:
983:
973:
968:
967:
966:
963:
949:
945:
941:
935:
930:
929:
928:
925:
919:
912:
905:
889:
885:
881:
880:
879:
876:
862:
858:
854:
850:
845:
841:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
799:
795:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
753:
749:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
707:
703:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
661:
657:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
615:
611:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
569:
565:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:Steve Andreas
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
523:
519:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
477:
473:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
443:
439:
435:
431:
426:
422:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
380:
376:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
330:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:Future Pacing
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
284:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
238:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
212:
209:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1302:
1299:
1276:
1251:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1205:Phil Bridger
1200:
1181:
1157:Phil Bridger
1134:
1096:
1087:
1063:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
993:
979:
959:
953:
897:
872:
867:
685:Robert Dilts
448:
213:
205:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
53:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
882:Delete per
161:free images
1308:talk page
1047:WP:BEFORE
940:• Gene93k
37:talk page
1310:or in a
1023:Keep all
995:Relisted
884:WP:UNDUE
122:View log
39:or in a
1064:Comment
1006:BusterD
888:WP:PSCI
840:protect
835:history
794:protect
789:history
748:protect
743:history
702:protect
697:history
656:protect
651:history
610:protect
605:history
564:protect
559:history
518:protect
513:history
472:protect
467:history
421:protect
416:history
375:protect
370:history
329:protect
324:history
283:protect
278:history
237:protect
232:history
167:WP refs
155:scholar
95:protect
90:history
1246:Famous
1228:should
1197:WP:SPS
1176:Famous
1171:WP:SPS
1129:Famous
1110:Warden
1106:WP:CSD
1084:Famous
1076:WP:NOT
1051:Warden
976:Famous
956:Famous
869:Famous
844:delete
798:delete
752:delete
706:delete
660:delete
614:delete
568:delete
522:delete
476:delete
425:delete
379:delete
333:delete
287:delete
241:delete
202:Famous
139:Google
99:delete
1277:Merge
1068:books
861:views
853:watch
849:links
815:views
807:watch
803:links
769:views
761:watch
757:links
723:views
715:watch
711:links
677:views
669:watch
665:links
631:views
623:watch
619:links
585:views
577:watch
573:links
539:views
531:watch
527:links
493:views
485:watch
481:links
442:views
434:watch
430:links
396:views
388:watch
384:links
350:views
342:watch
338:links
304:views
296:watch
292:links
258:views
250:watch
246:links
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
60:talk
16:<
1289:talk
1224:less
1209:talk
1161:talk
1114:talk
1055:talk
1010:talk
944:talk
886:and
857:logs
831:talk
827:edit
811:logs
785:talk
781:edit
765:logs
739:talk
735:edit
719:logs
693:talk
689:edit
673:logs
647:talk
643:edit
627:logs
601:talk
597:edit
581:logs
555:talk
551:edit
535:logs
509:talk
505:edit
489:logs
463:talk
459:edit
438:logs
412:talk
408:edit
392:logs
366:talk
362:edit
346:logs
320:talk
316:edit
300:logs
274:talk
270:edit
254:logs
228:talk
224:edit
175:FENS
149:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
1259:(c)
1253:dog
1233:one
1220:all
1201:all
1189:(c)
1183:dog
1142:(c)
1136:dog
1124:AFD
1089:dog
1039:NLP
981:dog
961:dog
903:OBO
874:dog
207:dog
189:TWL
124:•
120:– (
55:DGG
1291:)
1237:is
1211:)
1163:)
1155:.
1116:)
1108:.
1057:)
1033:;
1029:;
1012:)
974:.
946:)
936:.
859:|
855:|
851:|
847:|
842:|
838:|
833:|
829:|
813:|
809:|
805:|
801:|
796:|
792:|
787:|
783:|
767:|
763:|
759:|
755:|
750:|
746:|
741:|
737:|
721:|
717:|
713:|
709:|
704:|
700:|
695:|
691:|
675:|
671:|
667:|
663:|
658:|
654:|
649:|
645:|
629:|
625:|
621:|
617:|
612:|
608:|
603:|
599:|
583:|
579:|
575:|
571:|
566:|
562:|
557:|
553:|
537:|
533:|
529:|
525:|
520:|
516:|
511:|
507:|
491:|
487:|
483:|
479:|
474:|
470:|
465:|
461:|
440:|
436:|
432:|
428:|
423:|
419:|
414:|
410:|
394:|
390:|
386:|
382:|
377:|
373:|
368:|
364:|
348:|
344:|
340:|
336:|
331:|
327:|
322:|
318:|
302:|
298:|
294:|
290:|
285:|
281:|
276:|
272:|
256:|
252:|
248:|
244:|
239:|
235:|
230:|
226:|
169:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
62:)
1287:(
1207:(
1159:(
1112:(
1053:(
1008:(
942:(
917:ω
910:α
863:)
825:(
817:)
779:(
771:)
733:(
725:)
687:(
679:)
641:(
633:)
595:(
587:)
549:(
541:)
503:(
495:)
457:(
444:)
406:(
398:)
360:(
352:)
314:(
306:)
268:(
260:)
222:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
118:)
80:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.