423:
is held in high esteem and admired and affirmed by his fellows in the trenches, as it were. Also, evidently, by the elite in the field (see below). (A3) I am suspicious of a merit/elite standard as determined exclusively by peer popularity, e.g., some people who are mediocre at their game in chief may be quite good in politicking a following, while others are the opposite. (A4) Very important: Stanford
University's King Inst. obviously thinks Prof. Kapoor worthy at his game in chief. Is Knowledge taking the position that here the Stanford folks don't know who's who or what's what? (B1) His book today is a sought-after item on Amazon. (B2) His book covers a subject well-chosen and, in my humble opinion, likely to grow in importance as the passing of time increases the quality of vantage point and perspective from which to judge past events. To it Prof. Kapoor brings insight and special skills. (C1) I do not know Prof. Kapoor personally, nor do I have special interests in his situation. (C2) I do have a strong interest in the article's content, which I think very significant. I conjecture that the readership of Knowledge would be enriched by it.
396:: Thank you for the source. I'm not fully convinced by it, though. I am unable to find any reputable journal ranking trackers that would indicate any significance for the Peace & Change journal. I'm not sure being mentioned in "The Encyclopedia of Christianity" (is this supposed to be an authoritative publication itself to the point of being used as a basis for establishing journal notability?) qualifies as a pass of
383:
entry in the "The
Encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 4" it is one of three notable journals in the field of peace research. This is not my field, so I may be mistaken but there are sources supporting that this is a notable journal in the field. I think the argument is weak based on #8 alone, but it
422:
Not knowing the technical aspects of the deletion criteria, I am unaware how a possible "contrarian view" may be received, that: (A1) it may not be appropriate to judge Prof. Kapoor exclusively on his career's 'esteem ranking' in a hierarchy of elite academia. (A2) It is significant that his career
218:
509:
380:
332:#8 even though he was only co-editor in chief, but its close enough for me. Taken with all the other work he did, I think he passes the bar. Obviously the "" part of the article needs to be fixed. --
280:
212:
356:
to determine its citation score. Could someone else take a look? This is important as #8 would not apply if this is not a major academic journal. All I found is this
179:
302:
126:
111:
152:
147:
156:
139:
233:
106:
99:
17:
200:
73:
120:
116:
249:
Notability unclear. Doesn't pass per h-index from Google
Scholar. Doesn't hold a distinguished professorship as per
531:
460:
69:
194:
566:
40:
549:
522:
500:
481:
451:
432:
411:
388:
371:
336:
313:
294:
272:
81:
190:
406:
366:
289:
267:
360:
which shows that the most cited article in the journal had 116 citations, which is not impressive at all.
562:
447:
240:
143:
36:
77:
385:
333:
254:
250:
226:
357:
545:
401:
400:. I'd love to hear what other users have to say, particularly those with experience in academia.
361:
284:
262:
65:
496:
428:
345:
325:
306:
206:
95:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
561:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
348:
is not necessarily a "major, well-established academic journal in their subject area" as per
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
443:
135:
87:
397:
349:
329:
513:
477:
54:
541:
258:
60:
517:
492:
424:
173:
471:
384:
is there and there is additional evidence to support NPROF notability. --
516:. I'm sure there'd be good coverage in Hindi language as well. ─
557:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
534:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
463:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
353:
281:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
324:
it seems there is an argument due to him being editor of
257:. No multiple secondary reliable sources for a pass of
169:
165:
161:
225:
540:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
469:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
491:By searching it for Sudarshan Kapur, 54 results.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
569:). No further edits should be made to this page.
301:Note: This discussion has been included in the
279:Note: This discussion has been included in the
239:
8:
127:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
354:Scimago Journal & Country Rank website
303:list of India-related deletion discussions
300:
278:
508:Appears subjective notable to me. See
7:
352:#8? I cannot seem to find it as the
253:. No clear indication of a pass of
24:
344:: Would it be fair to say that
112:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
442:Appears to be passing NPROF.
102:(AfD)? Read these primers!
586:
559:Please do not modify it.
550:03:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
523:02:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
501:22:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
482:07:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
82:12:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
452:15:39, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
433:01:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
412:19:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
389:19:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
372:17:38, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
337:17:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
314:17:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
295:06:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
273:06:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
100:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
346:Peace & Change
326:Peace & Change
552:
484:
316:
297:
117:Guide to deletion
107:How to contribute
57:
577:
539:
537:
535:
520:
468:
466:
464:
409:
404:
369:
364:
311:
292:
287:
270:
265:
244:
243:
229:
177:
159:
136:Sudarshan Kapoor
97:
88:Sudarshan Kapoor
63:
53:
34:
585:
584:
580:
579:
578:
576:
575:
574:
573:
567:deletion review
553:
530:
528:
518:
485:
459:
457:
407:
402:
367:
362:
307:
290:
285:
268:
263:
186:
150:
134:
131:
94:
91:
59:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
583:
581:
572:
571:
538:
527:
526:
525:
503:
467:
456:
455:
454:
436:
435:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
318:
317:
298:
255:WP:NACADEMIC#1
251:WP:NACADEMIC#5
247:
246:
183:
130:
129:
124:
114:
109:
92:
90:
85:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
582:
570:
568:
564:
560:
555:
554:
551:
547:
543:
536:
533:
524:
521:
515:
511:
507:
504:
502:
498:
494:
490:
487:
486:
483:
480:
479:
474:
473:
465:
462:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
421:
413:
410:
405:
399:
395:
392:
391:
390:
387:
382:
379:according to
378:
375:
374:
373:
370:
365:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
340:
339:
338:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
319:
315:
312:
310:
304:
299:
296:
293:
288:
282:
277:
276:
275:
274:
271:
266:
260:
256:
252:
242:
238:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
192:
189:
188:Find sources:
184:
181:
175:
171:
167:
163:
158:
154:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
132:
128:
125:
122:
118:
115:
113:
110:
108:
105:
104:
103:
101:
96:
89:
86:
84:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
62:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
558:
556:
529:
505:
488:
476:
470:
458:
439:
393:
376:
341:
321:
309:CAPTAIN RAJU
308:
248:
236:
230:
222:
215:
209:
203:
197:
187:
93:
49:
47:
31:
28:
444:Dhawangupta
213:free images
403:nearlyevil
363:nearlyevil
286:nearlyevil
264:nearlyevil
563:talk page
440:Weak keep
322:weak keep
37:talk page
565:or in a
542:Missvain
532:Relisted
519:The Aafī
461:Relisted
398:WP:NPROF
350:WP:NPROF
330:WP:NPROF
180:View log
121:glossary
61:Aseleste
39:or in a
493:Elfelix
425:Elfelix
394:Comment
377:comment
342:Comment
219:WP refs
207:scholar
153:protect
148:history
98:New to
386:hroest
334:hroest
259:WP:GNG
191:Google
157:delete
489:JSTOR
234:JSTOR
195:books
174:views
166:watch
162:links
16:<
546:talk
514:this
512:and
510:this
506:Keep
497:talk
448:talk
429:talk
381:this
358:link
328:per
227:FENS
201:news
170:logs
144:talk
140:edit
50:keep
408:665
368:665
291:665
269:665
241:TWL
178:– (
548:)
499:)
472:jp
450:)
431:)
305:.
283:.
261:.
221:)
172:|
168:|
164:|
160:|
155:|
151:|
146:|
142:|
80:)
76:,
72:|
68:,
58:~
52:.
544:(
495:(
478:g
475:×
446:(
427:(
245:)
237:·
231:·
223:·
216:·
210:·
204:·
198:·
193:(
185:(
182:)
176:)
138:(
123:)
119:(
78:l
74:c
70:e
66:t
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.